<. >iflgj and F. , F= ?PGFKFEP N8J ;@8>EFJ<;8=K<IJLI><IP-E<G8K@<EKFG<I8K<;FELJ@E>> %%214?8, p.8

<. @==<i<e, <JJGI<:CL;<:FDG8I@JFEN@K?K?@JJJKL;PN?@:?I<GFIK<;8JC@>?KCP?@>?

D. >iflg, N@K? 8 =@E8C I<8KK8:?<; I<K@E8 I8K< F= 8E, p.8

G. Flkj, 8;M8EK8><JJ F= % 214JJI<GFIK<;<8IC@<I@ED8:LC8IM@KI<FLJ 8E;0"JLI><IP K?<JLI>@:8CFG<I8K@E> K@D<N8JJJ@D@C8I@E9FK?>IFLGJ2?<DFJK@DGFIK8EK=8:KFI@JJK?<K@D<F=M@KI<:KFDPG<IJ< 8JJJK8K<;89FM<1@E:<FLIJKL;PN8JJEFKI8E;FD@Q<;8E;EFK;<J@>E<;KF:?<:BK?@JJGF@EK N<:8EEFK:FDG8I<K?<;LI8K@FEF=<8:?JK<GF=0"JLI><IP+FJKJKL;@<JJI<GFIK@E>>J?FIK<I JLI><IP, 4<JG<:@8CCP@ED8:LC8IJLI><IP ,F JN@K:? KF K?< %% JPJK<D N8JJ E<:<JJ8IP @E K?@JJ :FEJ<:LK@M< J<I@<J 2

K. @e, I<:<EK G8G<I !?FIF@;8C ;<K8:?D<EK 8E; ?<DFII?8>< N<I<EFK<;@EFE<I8E;FD@Q<;JKL, p.8

G. @e, 8I:<I8K@FE 8E; GFJKFG<I8K@M< <E;FG?K?8CD@K@J'E:FEKI8JKKFN?8K?8JJ9<<E;<J:I@9<;@EK?<C@K<I8KLI< N<;@;EFK F9J<IM<=I<HL<EK?PGFKFEPFIGFJKFG<I8K@M<:?FIF@;8C

<. I<dfm@e>>m@ki<fljjn@, @J@FEJJN@K?8;<HL8K<NFLE, @E8GGFJ@K@FE

J. Lj<, :?FI@FI<K@E8C8;?<J@FE 2?< FECP@EKI8FG<I8K@M<, @==<I<E:<

C. G8k@<ek, FD=FIK N?@:? I<HL@I<JJ 8 I8E;FD@Q<; ;<J@>E I<:<EK EFE:FDG8I8K@M<JKL;PI<GFIK<;8C<JJJK?8E I8K<F=G8K@<EKJJN@K?DF, pp.8-8

M. I<k@e8c, <K8:?D<EK 8 GIFJG<:K@M< I8E;FD@Q<; DLCK@:<EK<I :C@E@:8CJKL;P-G?, p.8

+. Li><e<i and <. 1k8e>fjj, C<I8C 9L:BC@E>> =FI GJ<L;FG?8B@: I?<>D8KF><EFLJJ I<K@E8C, p.8

9. Gj<l, FG?8B@: 8E; 8G?8B@: I<K@E8C ;<K8:?D<EK J@O DFEK?

K. Fe, EFL<6)8;FEFJFEF)68D8B8N82<K8C 1LI>@:8CCP @E;L:<;@E=C8DD8K@FEN@K?

8. Ki8ej, KFDP=FII?<>D8KF><EFLJJI<K@E8C;<K8:?D<EK0<K@E8 -C@M<@I8* 0<@J1@C@:FE<F@CK8DGFE8;<@E >8L><KI8EJ:FEALE:K@M8CJLKLI<C<JJ M@KI<:KFDP0<K@E8 &FCC8, L9<IK &" .FJKJLI>@:8C ?PGFKFEP I<C8K@FEJ?@G KF =@JKLC@Q8K@FE @E=C8DD8K@FE :?FI@FI<K@E8CC<J@FEJJJ8E;K?<M@KI<FLJ1LIM-G?K?8CDFC #IEJK<I4*,<JK<;:8J< :FEKIFCJKL;@<J.I<M+<

C. Gauge-dans-la-chirurgie-du-décollement-de-rétine, This prospective comparative study of Retinal Detachment surgery using the 20-or 23- Gauge technique showed that, especially in pseudophakic eyes, the results of both techniques are not significantly different in terms of the single reattachment rate (77%) and the visual outcome (0.4±0.4 logMAR at the 6-month visit}, and did not confirm the superiority of one technique over the other for the repair of nonsevere rhegmatogenous RD . The 23-Gauge Transconjunctival Sutureless Vitrectomy technique allows the surgeon to reach the same objectives as the 20-Gauge technique, but with its own limitations and potential complications

B. Sele-professeur-~c-'.-p-·-fov, JJ:..r ~ di:tsmemoremfaudcs, rcpcdmqucfidclcs Inge ni j do tc;s , Hipp ocrndsque decus

. Democriti-oud, itorPha:beo, 6, Goë propogo, Ccrtius :ui q u.is te trod.idit "rris opes?