7 a. La partie externe (ou processeur externe) ,
14 a. Les réglages, p.14 ,
17 a. La lecture labiale ,
21 a. Les conditions habituelles, p.22 ,
33 I. La perception acoustique avec un implant cochléaire, PARTIE, vol.3, p.33 ,
34 a, La modulation temporelle, vol.35, p.35 ,
36 b, ., p.38 ,
40 a, p.42 ,
47 a. La perception dégradée du timbre 48 b. La perte des basses fréquences, ., p.50 ,
56 III. Population d'étude, 62 a. Choix des questionnaires, p.62 ,
ERP evidence for the recognition of emotional prosody through simulated cochlear implant strategies, BMC Neuroscience, vol.13, issue.1, p.113, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.015
Validation du questionnaire de qualit?? de vie ERSA (??valuation du retentissement de la surdit?? chez l???adulte), Annales fran??aises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, vol.129, issue.4, pp.13-14, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.aforl.2012.07.128
Telephone use: What benefit do cochlear implant users receive?, International Journal of Audiology, vol.5, issue.1, pp.45-446, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1288/00005537-199103000-00011
La surdité de la prothèse à l'implant, 2002. ,
Cochlear implant in adults. La Revue de médecine interne, pp.143-149, 2012. ,
Implant cochléaire et musique: étude de l'impact d'un entraînement musical sur l'appréciation de la musique chez l'adulte devenu sourd implanté: études de cas, 2006. ,
Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency., Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, vol.44, issue.3, pp.400-413, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1037/h0084255
Effects of long-term training on aided speechrecognition performance in noise in older adults, Journal of speech, issue.3, pp.51-759, 2008. ,
Evaluer et améliorer la perception musicale chez l'adulte implanté cochléaire: observations et pistes rééducatives, Mémoire pour le Certificat de Capacité d'Orthophonie, 2004. ,
La communication téléphonique chez les adultes devenus sourds et implantés cochléaires, Mémoire pour le Certificat de Capacité d'Orthophonie, 2009. ,
Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40 + users, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol.19, issue.7, pp.714-717, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1017/S0022215100096614
Unintelligible Low-Frequency Sound Enhances Simulated Cochlear-Implant Speech Recognition in Noise, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.53, issue.12, pp.2598-2601, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2006.883793
Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition, Hearing Research, vol.235, issue.1-2, pp.143-156, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2237883
A novel temporal fine structure-based speech synthesis model for cochlear implant, Signal Processing, vol.88, issue.11, pp.2693-2699, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.05.011
Production of Weak Elements in Speech ??? Evidence from F<sub>0</sub> Patterns of Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese, Phonetica, vol.63, issue.1, pp.47-75, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000091406
Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review, Trends in Amplification, vol.11, issue.3, pp.161-192, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1084713807304357
Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears, Ear and Hearing, vol.25, issue.1, pp.9-21, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111261.84611.C8
Histoire de l'implant cochléaire. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, pp.288-296, 2010. ,
Tests phonétiques pouvant être instrumentalisés dans le processus global de l'auditibilité dans le bruit. Mémoire de l'université Henri Point Carré pour le dîplome d'état d'Audioprothésiste, 2010. ,
The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, Ear and Hearing, vol.16, issue.2, pp.176-186, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005
An Investigation of Telephone Use Among Cochlear Implant Recipients, American Journal of Audiology, vol.13, issue.2, pp.200-212, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/025)
Bimodal Hearing Benefit for Speech Recognition with Competing Voice in Cochlear Implant Subject with Normal Hearing in Contralateral Ear, Ear and Hearing, vol.31, issue.1, pp.31-70, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bc7722
Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, pp.290-293, 2005. ,
Implants cochléaires chez l'adulte et l'enfant. Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale, p.12, 1998. ,
Cochlear Implant Characteristics and Speech Perception Skills of Adolescents With Long-Term Device Use, Otology & Neurotology, vol.31, issue.8, pp.31-1310, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181eb320c
Facial Identity and Facial Emotions: Speed, Accuracy, and Processing Strategies in Children and Adults, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), vol.24, issue.2, pp.200-213, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1076/jcen.24.2.200.989
The Benefits of Combining Acoustic and Electric Stimulation for the Recognition of Speech, Voice and Melodies, Audiology and Neurotology, vol.13, issue.2, pp.105-112, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000111782
Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol.45, issue.5, pp.779-789, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1682/JRRD.2007.08.0118
Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.97, issue.1, p.585, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.413112
Implantations cochléaires: guide pratique d'évaluation et de rééducation, Paris: Ortho. Edition, vol.138, 1997. ,
Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.132, issue.4, pp.336-342, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.4754432
Frequency Mapping in Cochlear Implants, Ear and Hearing, vol.23, issue.4, pp.339-348, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00009
Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.112, issue.4, p.1664, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.1502901
Melodic Contour Identification by Cochlear Implant Listeners, Ear and Hearing, vol.28, issue.3, pp.302-319, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627492
Melodic Contour Identification and Music Perception by Cochlear Implant Users, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.8, issue.Suppl, pp.518-533, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627487
Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.109, issue.2, pp.713-726, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.1340650
The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects, Neuropsychologia, vol.40, issue.9, pp.1562-1569, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00023-4
La recontruction cognitive de la parole dégradée: étude de l'intelligibilité comme indice d'une capacité cognitive humaine, Thèse de l'université Lumière Lyon 2 & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 2007. ,
Attribution of Emotions to Story Characters by Severely and Profoundly Deaf Children, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, vol.134, issue.3, pp.145-159, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10882-006-9029-1
Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.116, issue.4, p.2298, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.1785611
Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.121, issue.6, pp.223-229, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.2720938
Telephone use in a group of nucleus cochlear implant recipients, Clinical articles CochlearTM, vol.2, pp.52-54, 2008. ,
Recognition of affective speech prosody and facial affect in deaf children with unilateral right cochlear implants. Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence, pp.136-146, 2009. ,
A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.124, issue.1, pp.498-509, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.2924131
Localisation spatiale et perception dans le bruit : effet d'un entraînement sur des adultes implantés cochléaires, Mémoire pour le Certificat de Capacité d'Orthophonie, 2009. ,
The Effects of Short-Term Computerized Speech-in-Noise Training on Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, vol.56, issue.1, pp.81-88, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0291)
Telephone Usage in the Hearing-Impaired Population, Ear and Hearing, vol.13, issue.5, pp.311-319, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00009
Sound Localization in Noise by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users, Ear and Hearing, vol.33, issue.4, pp.445-457, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318257607b
Surdité et langage Prothèses, LPC et implants cochléaires, 2007. ,
Validation du questionnaire: évaluation du retentissement de la surdité chez l'adulte. Mémoire pour le Certificat de Capacité d'Orthophonie, 2010. ,
Current Research on Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Users, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, vol.45, issue.1, pp.129-140, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.021
Music perception of cochlear implant users: A questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program, International Journal of Audiology, vol.8, issue.2, pp.116-128, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00644-5
A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation, International Journal of Audiology, vol.26, issue.5, pp.50-503, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.1874632
Fine Structure Processing improves speech perception as well as objective and subjective benefits in pediatric MED-EL COMBI 40+ users, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol.74, issue.12, pp.74-1372, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.09.005
Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.103, issue.49, pp.18866-18869, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0607364103
Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.131, issue.2, pp.1325-1336, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.3672708
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3292606
Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: Speech intelligibility and music sound quality, International Journal of Audiology, vol.1, issue.4, pp.279-287, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1038/352236a0
Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus?? cochlear implant, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol.69, issue.12, pp.69-1667, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.049
Perception de la musique par le patient implanté cochléaire . Intérêts de l 'audition résiduelle. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, pp.81-82, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.aforl.2012.07.215
Music Perception with Cochlear Implants: A Review, Trends in Amplification, vol.8, issue.2, pp.49-82, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1177/108471380400800203
The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients, International Journal of Audiology, vol.11, issue.1, pp.38-48, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00129492-200303000-00019
Speech perception in cochlear implant users with the HiRes 120 strategy: a systematic review, pp.129-133, 2012. ,
Self-Reported Listening Habits and Enjoyment of Music among Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients, Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, vol.1, issue.5, pp.350-355, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00009
Performances et complications de l???implant cochl??aire chez 134 patients adultes implant??s depuis 1990, Annales d'Otolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale, pp.71-78, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0003-438X(06)76645-2
Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 TM sound processor for Nucleus® 24 cochlear implant recipients, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, p.405, 2013. ,
Auditory, Visual, and Auditory-Visual Perception of Emotions by Individuals With Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids, and Normal Hearing, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, vol.14, issue.4, pp.449-464, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1093/deafed/enp007
Perception of Suprasegmental Features of Speech by Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Hearing Aids, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, vol.12, issue.3, pp.350-361, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/deafed/enm012
Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users. ORL: Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, pp.185-198, 2012. ,
Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor, HNO, vol.24, issue.6, pp.567-574, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00106-008-1781-3
Effect of cochlear implants on children???s perception and production of speech prosody, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.131, issue.2, pp.1307-1314, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.3672697
Les évaluations des adultes devenus sourds porteurs d'un implant cochléaire. Mémoire pour le Certificat de Capacité d'Orthophonie de l, 2010. ,
Acoustic Cue Integration in Speech Intonation Recognition With Cochlear Implants, Trends in Amplification, vol.16, issue.2, pp.67-82, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1084713812451159
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3560417
Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.123, issue.2, pp.1054-1062, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.2828051
Studies of Prosody Perception by Cochlear Implant Patients, International Journal of Audiology, vol.11, issue.4, pp.231-245, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.3109/00206099809072977
1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol.242, issue.6, pp.988-991, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817fe00f
Synthèse et réalisation d'études cliniques sur l'implant cochléaire, 2001. ,
How cochlear implants encode speech. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, pp.444-448, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.moo.0000134452.24819.c0
A metaanalysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation, International journal of audiology, issue.12, pp.50-871, 2011. ,
C106 Pitch perception in cochlear implanted and classical hearing aid users, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol.75, pp.75-52, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-5876(11)70274-9
Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor. ORL: Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, pp.6-11, 2012. ,
The Influence of Environmental Sound Training on the Perception of Spectrally Degraded Speech and Environmental Sounds, Trends in Amplification, vol.16, issue.2, pp.83-101, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1084713812454225
Cochlear Implant Melody Recognition as a Function of Melody Frequency Range, Harmonicity, and Number of Electrodes, Ear and Hearing, vol.30, issue.2, pp.160-168, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342b9
Réhabilitation de la surdité profonde par l ' implant cochléaire uni-ou bilatéral chez l'adulte sourd post-lingual Profound deafness rehabilitation by uni-or bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingual deaf adults, pp.36-39, 2010. ,
Réhabilitation prothétique de l'audition chez l'adulte. De la prothèse conventionnelle aux implants. Traité d'ORL, 2008. ,
Clinical Assessment of Pitch Perception, Otology & Neurotology, vol.32, issue.5, pp.736-741, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821f1584
Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO + and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO + cochlear implant systems in Finnishspeaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners? Acta oto-laryngologica, pp.984-991, 2008. ,
Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.82, issue.4, pp.1152-1161, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.395251
Psychologie de la surdité. Bruxelles: De boeck, p.524, 2006. ,
Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.131, issue.5, pp.4042-4050, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1121/1.3699191
Le guide de l'audition, 2009. ,
Predicting Hearing Aid Microphone Preference in Everyday Listening, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol.15, issue.5, pp.365-396, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.3766/jaaa.15.5.4
Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future, Hearing Research, vol.242, issue.1-2, pp.3-21, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.005
Vocal emotion recognition by normalhearing listeners and cochlear implant users, Trends in amplification, vol.11, issue.4, pp.301-315, 2007. ,
Fait le : A : Signature : Annexe 2 : Le cahier d'observation Histoire de la surdité ,
? Lafon liste 1 : mots : ???% Phonèmes : ????% -? Lafon liste 2 : mots : ???% Phonèmes : ????% ? MBBA dans le bruit : phrases à 60dB : -? Rapport S, B=10dB : Mots :????% Phrases : ????..% -? Rapport S/B=5dB : Mots : ????.% Phrases : ????.% Résultats 2 : Post renouvellement 1) Questionnaires : ? APHAB : score global ,
est ce que votre nouveau processeur vous apporte ? En êtes-vous satisfait ,