C. Basset-mens and H. M. Van-der-werf, Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, pp.127-144, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460814

I. S. Eriksson, H. Elmquist, S. Stern, and T. Nybrant, Environmental systems analysis of pig production ? The impact of feed choice. Environmental systems analysis, pp.143-154, 2005.

S. Espagnol, S. Lagadec, and Y. Salaün, Première estimation de l'empreinte carbone de la production porcine au portail de la ferme, pp.25-34, 2009.

S. Espagnol, A. Rugani, C. Baratte, C. Roguet, M. Marcon et al., Référentiel environnemental et socio-économique des systèmes d'élevage porcin conventionnels français, pp.109-114, 2012.

P. J. Lammers, M. D. Kenealy, J. B. Kliebenstien, J. D. Harmon, M. J. Helmers et al., Nonsolar energy use and one-hundred-year global warming potential of Iowa swine feedstuffs and feeding strategies, Journal of Animal Science, vol.88, issue.3, pp.1204-1212, 2010.
DOI : 10.2527/jas.2009-2371

E. Mosnier, H. M. Van-der-werf, J. Boissy, and J. Dourmad, Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment, animal, vol.5, issue.12, pp.12-1972, 2011.
DOI : 10.2527/jas.2009-2371

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01461056

T. T. Nguyen, I. Bouvarel, P. Ponchant, and H. M. Van-der-werf, Using environmental constraints to formulate low-impact poultry feeds, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.28, pp.215-224, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.029

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01209097

N. Pelletier, Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions, Agricultural Systems, vol.98, issue.2, pp.98-67, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007

C. Rigolot, B. Meda, S. Espagnol, T. Trochet, and J. Dourmad, Analyses de cycle de vie (ACV) de 5 systèmes porcins avec différentes hypothèses de comptabilisation des impacts, pp.1-2, 2009.