T. V. Baldev, India in the World Order, Searching for Major-Power Status, 2003.

A. Shirley and P. T. Baldev, China and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and missiles: policy issues, CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL31555 in the World Order, pp.1-32, 2003.

. Jean-françois, « Le rapport de clientèle : du phénomène social à l'analyse politique », Revue française de science politique, 26e année, n°1, pp.103-131, 1976.

A. Graham and . Philip, Essence of decision, explaining the cuban missile crisis, p.417, 1999.

B. Michael, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, p.226, 2004.

B. Peter and . Thomas, La construction sociale de la réalité, p.340, 1986.

B. E. Kenneth, The image, p.175, 1956.

B. Pierre and L. Distinction, Critique sociale du jugement, 1979.

B. Pierre, Le sens pratique, p.474, 1980.

B. Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 1977.

B. Hedley, the Control of the arms race: disarmament and arms control in the missile age, p.232, 1961.

B. Barry, From international to world society? : English school theory and the social structure of globalization, p.320, 2004.

B. Barry, J. Charles, and . Richard, The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism, p.267, 1993.

D. Michel, Sociologie des crises politiques. La dynamique des mobilisations multisectorielles, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, p.371, 1986.

D. Emile, De la division du travail social, p.416, 2007.

G. Anthony, La constitution de la société, Eléments de la théorie de la structuration, 1984.

J. Robert, The illogic of American nuclear strategy, 1984.

J. Robert, The meaning of the nuclear revolution, p.272, 1989.

L. Jacques, Sociologie de l'institution, p.400, 2011.

M. James, A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge, pp.1-37, 2010.

M. David, The weapons state, Proliferation and the framing of security, p.221, 2000.

P. Jeffrey and R. Gerald, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, p.300, 1978.

S. C. Thomas, Arms and influence, p.293, 1966.

W. N. Kenneth and S. D. Scott, The Spread of nuclear weapons, A debate renewed, 2003.

W. N. Kenneth, Theory of International Politics, Long Rove, p.251, 2010.

W. Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics, p.429, 1999.

B. Jeffrey, The Indian foreign policy bureaucracy, p.305, 1985.

C. Raj, Weapons of Peace: the secret story of India's quest to be a nuclear power, p.489, 2000.

C. Stephen, The Indian Army, p.276, 1971.

C. M. Jerome, Indo-Russian Military and Nuclear Cooperation: Lessons and Options for US, p.169, 2001.

G. Bertrand, Le complexe atomique, histoire politique de l'énergie nucléaire, p.493, 1980.

J. Christophe, Inde contemporaine: De 1950 à nos jours, p.969, 2006.

J. Rebecca, Unfinished Business: The Negotiation of the CTBT and the End of Nuclear Testing, 2009.

K. Ashok, India's Nuclear Option, Atomic Diplomacy and Decision making, p.295, 1976.

K. Ashok, Pokhran and beyond: India's nuclear behaviour Delhi, p.264, 2001.

K. Harish, Diplomacy of India, then and now, p.399, 2002.

K. Bharat, N. Weapons, and I. Security, The realist foundation of strategy, p.757, 2005.

L. Adrian and S. Cathy, Deception: Pakistan, the United States and the secret trade in nuclear weapons, p.586, 2007.

M. Amitabh, India's Nuclear Deterrent: Pokhran II and Beyond, p.400, 1999.

M. J. Robert, The Cold War on the periphery : the United States, p.431, 1994.

M. M. Stephen, The Dynamics of Nuclear Proliferation, p.229, 1984.

M. C. Raja, Impossible Allies, Nuclear India, United States and the global order, p.311, 2006.

M. Raja and . Crossing-de-rubicon, The Shaping of India's new foreign policy, p.320, 2004.

P. T. Baldev, India in the World Order, Searching for Major-Power Status, p.304, 2003.

P. George, India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation, p.641, 2002.

. Rajan-mannaraswamighala and . Sreeranga, India in world affairs, pp.1954-56, 1964.

M. G. Stoessinger-john-george-de and . Robert, The United Nations and the superpowers: United States-Soviet interaction at the United Nations, p.210, 1970.

T. , K. S. Shirin, and I. , Pakistan and the United State: breaking with the past, p.156, 1997.

T. G. Raju and G. Amit, India's Nuclear Security, p.325, 2000.

A. Emmanuel, The emergence of cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control », International Organization, pp.101-145, 1992.

A. David and «. , Contre l'opposition « intérêts versus normes »Rivalités interétatiques et relations de clientèle sous un prisme », Études internationales, pp.525-546, 2006.

A. David and «. L. , humanitaire comme norme du discours au conseil de sécurité : une pratique légitimatrice socialement sanctionnée », Cultures et conflits n°60, pp.39-62, 2005.

B. Barry and M. Albert, Differentiation, European Journal of International Relations, vol.16, issue.3, pp.315-337, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-11717-8_7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00669816

D. Michel and «. Légitimité, Remarques sur quelques « complications » de la sociologie de Max Weber, Etre Gouverné. Hommages à Jean Leca, 2003.

F. Benjamin, The Brooding Shadow: Systemic Incentives and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation, Security Studies, vol.2, issue.¾, pp.37-78, 1993.

H. Peter, Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization, vol.46, pp.1-35

J. Robert, The political effects of nuclear weapons: A comment, International Security, vol.13, issue.2, pp.80-90, 1988.

J. Robert, Rational deterrence: theory and evidence, World Politics, vol.42, issue.2, pp.183-207

M. James and . Olsen-johan, « The Institutional dynamics of international Political Orders, International Organisation, pp.903-916, 1998.

M. Jean-françois, « Le rapport de clientèle : du phénomène social à l'analyse politique », Revue française de science politique, 26e année, n°1, pp.103-131, 1976.

R. Frédéric and «. , Les relations internationales selon Durkheim : un objet sociologique comme les autres, Études internationales, pp.495-514, 2004.

R. Frédéric, «. Marcelpdf, and T. Nina, Mauss et l'étude des relations internationales : un héritage oublié Stigmatizing the Bomb, Origins of the Nuclear Taboo, Sociologie et sociétés, pp.227-245, 2004.

W. Kenneth and «. , Nuclear myths and political realities, American Political Science Review, vol.84, pp.731-745, 1990.

C. Bhumitra, Toward Pokhran II: Explaining India's Nuclearisation Process, Modern Asian Studies, vol.39, issue.1, pp.189-236, 2005.

D. A. Lewis, Nuclear Proliferation and World Politics, Nuclear Proliferation: Prospects, Problems, and Proposals, pp.96-109, 1977.

E. William, Why States Go--And Don't Go-Nuclear The Annals of The American Academy of, Political and Social Science, vol.430, pp.16-28, 1977.

G. Sumit, India's Pathway To Pokhran II, International Security, vol.23, issue.4, pp.148-177, 1999.

G. Frédéric, Les ambitions internationales de l'Inde à l'épreuve de la relation indopakistanaise , Les études du CERI, N° 83 -février, 2002.

M. Amitabh, India's Nuclear Policy in an Anarchic World India's Nuclear Deterrent: Pakhran II and Beyond, pp.9-33, 1999.

M. Amitabh, India's Nuclear Status Quo, Survival, pp.41-57, 1996.

M. Dinshaw, The Unrealized Promise of International Institutions: The Test Ban Treaty and India's Nuclear Breakout, Security Studies, vol.12, issue.4, pp.116-151, 2003.

O. Tanya, Is There a Nuclear Proliferation Debate? An Analysis of the Contemporary Debate, The Nonproliferation Review, vol.4, issue.1, pp.43-60, 1996.

O. Deepa, Mixed motives in India's search for nuclear status, Asian Survey, vol.41, issue.6, pp.925-967, 2001.

R. Jean-luc, Les relations indo-pakistanaises entre Realpolitik et nouvel ordre mondial », Politique étrangère, pp.297-307, 2006.

R. Baskar and . Le-deuxième-age-nucléaire-indien, Portée et Limites de la Diplomatie Nucléaire d'une Puissance Pivotale », AFRI, p.278, 2006.

S. Jaswant and «. États, Inde : le poids du passé, les promesses de l'avenir », Politique américaine, pp.13-24, 2006.

T. Ashley and J. , India's Emerging Nuclear Posture. Between Recessed Deterrent and Ready Arsenal, 2001.

W. William, International Nuclear Relations after the Indian and Pakistani Test Explosions, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs, vol.74, issue.3, pp.505-52, 1944.

A. Cmde, S. Jasjit, L. Gen, K. Bm, and . India, The relevance of nuclear deterrence, étude publiée par le Delhi Policy Group, IPCS Special Report, vol.13, 2006.

G. Rajiv, A World Free of Nuclear Weapons: An action Plan, " proposal presented at the United Nations General Assembly Third Special Session on Disarmament, p.9, 1988.

G. Arundhati, Discours prononcé devant la Conférence du Désarment réunie en session plénière à Genève le 20 juin 1996, Document CD/PV The CTBT and Nuclear Disarmament: The Indian View, Journal of International Affairs, vol.740, issue.51, pp.239-261, 1996.

G. Arundhati, Negotiating the CTBT: India's Security Concerns and Nuclear Disarmament, Journal of International Affairs, vol.51, issue.1, 1997.

P. S. India, . The-nuclear-test, and . Ban, Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis, pp.65-70, 1996.

G. Camille and . Nucléaire, Le grand pari sur l'Inde », Alternatives économiques, 17 octobre, 2008.

N. Jawal, India to deploy Prithvi missile, plan new test, Executive News Service, pp.16-1996

M. Brajesh, India's National Security Advisor to the Prime, Minister, The Outlook, 2001.

A. Charles, U.S. urges india not to deploy new missile, Reuters, pp.16-1996
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00422502

B. Farhan and R. Vivek, Pakistan vows response to new India missile threat, Defense News Service, pp.16-1996

B. John, India denies Atom-test Plan But Then Turns Ambiguous, pp.16-1996

«. La and .. Diplomatie-nucléaire-»-en-tant-que-organisation, 62 2.1 L'organisation officielle de l'appareil diplomatique indien, p.63

C. De-la, Autonomie de la « voûte de légitimation, p.78

L. Effets-de-la-mobilisation-de-la, C. Sur-les-transactions-intersectorielles......., and T. , 80 2.1 L'opposition ferme, p.81

L. Entretien and .. , avec Z, ancien sous-directeur des questions multilatérales et du désarmement au sein de la direction des affaires stratégiques, p.102, 2012.