V. Bibliographiques, CNGOF, Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. La prise en charge du couple infertile, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.1, pp.39-40, 2010.

P. Merviel, Qu???est-ce que la mild stimulation???, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.40, issue.9, pp.467-71, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.07.022

N. P. Polyzos, Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with 9. Christin-Maitre, S. and R. Braham, [General mechanisms of premature ovarian failure and clinical check-up], Gynecol Obstet Fertil, issue.9, pp.36-857, 2008.

S. Christin-maitre, L???insuffisance ovarienne pr??matur??e, Annales d'Endocrinologie, vol.67, issue.6, pp.557-66, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0003-4266(06)73007-4

K. Munster, L. Schmidt, and P. Helm, Length and variation in the menstrual cycle-a cross-sectional study from a Danish county, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.40, issue.5, pp.99-422, 1992.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.203.6.377

B. M. Sherman, J. H. West, and S. G. Korenman, The Menopausal Transition: Analysis of LH, FSH, Estradiol, and Progesterone Concentrations During Menstrual Cycles of Older Women, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol.42, issue.4, pp.629-665, 1976.
DOI : 10.1210/jcem-42-4-629

K. R. Hansen, Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number, Fertility and Sterility, vol.95, issue.1, pp.170-175, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006

S. Tsepelidis, Stable serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone during the menstrual cycle: a prospective study in normo-ovulatory women, Human Reproduction, vol.22, issue.7, pp.22-1837, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dem101

N. A. Dennis, The Level of Serum Anti-M??llerian Hormone Correlates with Vitamin D Status in Men and Women But Not in Boys, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol.97, issue.7, pp.97-2450, 2012.
DOI : 10.1210/jc.2012-1213

V. Masse, Normal serum concentrations of anti-Mullerian hormone in a population of fertile women in their first trimester of pregnancy, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.12, pp.26-3431, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der320

J. P. Toner and D. B. Seifer, Why we may abandon basal follicle-stimulating hormone testing: a sea change in determining ovarian reserve using antim??llerian hormone, Fertility and Sterility, vol.99, issue.7, pp.99-1825, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.001

V. Grzegorczyk-martin, [Low circulating anti-Mullerian hormone and normal follicle stimulating hormone levels: which prognosis in an IVF program?], Gynecol Obstet Fertil, pp.40-47, 2012.

F. J. Broekmans, The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization, Fertility and Sterility, vol.94, issue.3, pp.1044-51, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.040

S. L. Broer, The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count, Fertility and Sterility, vol.91, issue.3, pp.91-705, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013

M. F. Mutlu, Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-m??llerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.18, issue.1, pp.657-65, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-013-9975-3

A. Gibreel, Ultrasound tests of ovarian reserve; A systematic review of accuracy in predicting fertility outcomes, Human Fertility, vol.6, issue.2, pp.95-106, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01068.x

L. F. Bancsi, Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis, Fertility and Sterility, vol.79, issue.5, pp.79-1091, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00078-5

K. Jayaprakasan, A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-M??llerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of??ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation, Fertility and Sterility, vol.93, issue.3
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.042

F. Lamazou, [Intra-uterine insemination outcomes according to the serum AMH level on day 3], J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, issue.2, pp.2012-2053

Z. Pandian, Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Cancellation of IVF-ET cycles: poor prognosis, poor responder, or variability of the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation? An analysis of 142 cancellations], J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.2010, issue.11, pp.2012-2053

J. L. Pouly, Interpr??tation et finalit?? des r??sultats en Assistance m??dicale ?? la procr??ation, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.38, issue.9, pp.521-528, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.07.010

P. Arvis, Les mod??les pr??dictifs de grossesse en AMP, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.42, issue.1, pp.12-20
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.003

S. K. Sunkara, Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.7, pp.26-1768, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der106

T. Freour, IVF conversion to IUI in poor responders: an observational study, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.13, issue.1, pp.445-454, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-010-1515-0

J. D. Nicopoullos and H. Abdalla, Poor response cycles: when should we cancel? Comparison of outcome between egg collection, intrauterine insemination conversion, and follow-up cycles after abandonment, Fertility and Sterility, vol.95, issue.1, pp.68-71, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.030

J. M. Norian, Conversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: Is it advantageous?, Fertility and Sterility, vol.94, issue.6, pp.2073-2080, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.056

D. E. Reichman, In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in the setting of three or fewer follicles: how should patients proceed when follicular response falls short of expectation?, Fertility and Sterility, vol.100, issue.1, pp.94-103, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.049

S. K. Sunkara, Should androgen supplementation be used for poor ovarian response in IVF? Hum Reprod, pp.637-677, 2012.

M. Gonzalez-comadran, Effects of transdermal testosterone in poor responders undergoing IVF: systematic review and meta-analysis, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.25, issue.5, pp.450-459, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.011

I. J. Kadoch, S. J. Phillips, and F. Bissonnette, Modified natural-cycle in??vitro fertilization should be??considered as the first approach in young poor responders, Fertility and Sterility, vol.96, issue.5, pp.96-1066, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.052