Venous thromboemeolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database, BJOG, vol.108, pp.56-60, 2001. ,
Evolution du taux de césarienne ,
Enqu??te nationale sur la prise en charge et l???accouchement des ut??rus unicicatriciels en France en 2009, Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction, pp.41-445, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.03.008
Peut-on refuser une césarienne de convenance? Réalité en Gynecologie-Obstétrique, 2008. ,
Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Accouchement en cas d'utérus cicatriciel, Décembre 2012 [Consulté le 9 mai 2014] www.cngof.asso.fr/D_TELE/RPC_uterus_cicatriciel_2012.pdf 8 Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retroprospective study of itra-operative and post-opérative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10year period, Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français, pp.74-75, 1997. ,
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, SOGC février, vol.155, pp.1-14, 2005. ,
Conséquences respiratoires néonatales de la césarienne. Réalités en gynécologie-obstétrique, Juin, vol.163, pp.28-30, 2012. ,
Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.345, issue.1, pp.3-8, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM200107053450101
Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Les grossesses prolongées élaborées par le (CNGOF) [Consulté le : 21/07 Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after prior ceasarean delivery, Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français, pp.2581-2590, 2004. ,
The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery Rate, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.340, issue.1, pp.54-61, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199901073400112
Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery, J. Perinat. Med. Boston, pp.1515-0103, 2012. ,
A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening : dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter Mechanical methods for induction of labour, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews, vol.125, issue.3, 2012. ,
Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.26, issue.1, pp.29-32, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0028-2243(89)90210-4
Diagnostic et traitement curatif de l'infection bactérienne précoce du nouveau-né. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique, 2002. ,
Babies born by C-section at risk of developing allergies, 2013. ,
Déclenchement artificiel du travail sur utérus cicatriciel par ballon extra-amniotique versus Syntocinon® Etude de 114 cas à la maternité régionale universitaire de Nancy, 2013. ,
Cervical Assessment, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.38, issue.2, pp.224-255, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00003081-199506000-00005
Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery Mode de déclenchement du travail et conduite de travail en cas d'utérus cicatriciel. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology La Revue Sage-Femme Février, vol.191, issue.12, pp.1-40, 2004. ,
Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment, e6 27. Schmitz.T. Peut-on déclencher les utérus cicatriciels ? Réalités en gynécologieobstétrique février, pp.1-320, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.014
??pid??miologie de l'infection bact??rienne maternof??tale: Exp??rience d'un centre p??rinatal, Journal de P??diatrie et de Pu??riculture, vol.13, pp.4-9, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0987-7983(00)80112-7
Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.378, issue.9809, pp.2095-2103, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0
Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increaseinfectious morbidity? A systematic review, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, pp.177-188, 2008. ,
Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.203, issue.5, pp.418-429 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038
Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop's score: a comparison of three methods, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.58, issue.2, pp.119-144, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0028-2243(95)80009-H
Transcervical Foley catheter should be used in preference to intravaginal prostaglandins for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.205, issue.1, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.010
Clinical risk factors for placenta previa???placenta accreta, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.177, issue.1, pp.210-214, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70463-0
Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.175, issue.6 ,
DOI : 10.1080/01443610500231450
Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.46, issue.1 ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00392-2