S. Ziebe, K. Petersen, S. Lindenberg, A. Andersen, A. Gabrielsen et al., Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization, Human Reproduction, vol.12, issue.7, pp.12-1545, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1545

D. K. Gardner, M. Lane, J. Stevens, T. Schlenker, and W. B. Schoolcraft, Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer, Fertility and Sterility, vol.73, issue.6, pp.73-1155, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5

P. Braude, V. Bolton, and S. Moore, Human gene expressionfirst occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development, Nature, issue.6163, pp.332-459, 1988.

Y. Maruyama and . Yoshimura, Global gene expression profiling of preimplantation embryos, Hum Cell, vol.19, issue.3, pp.98-117, 2006.

P. Rinaudo and R. M. Schultz, Effects of embryo culture on global pattern of gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos, Reproduction, vol.128, issue.3, pp.301-312, 2004.
DOI : 10.1530/rep.1.00297

Y. Menezo, M. Hazout, N. Dumont, B. Herbaut, and . Nicollet, Coculture of embryos on Vero cells and transfer of blastocysts in humans, Human Reproduction, vol.7, issue.suppl 1, pp.101-107, 1992.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/7.suppl_1.101

D. K. Gardner, M. Lane, I. Calderon, and J. Leeton, Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells**Supported by IVF America Inc., Greenwich, Connecticut and Monash IVF Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Fertility and Sterility, vol.65, issue.2, pp.349-53, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58097-2

D. K. Gardner, P. Vella, M. Lane, L. Wagley, T. Schlenker et al., Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers, Fertility and Sterility, vol.69, issue.1, pp.84-92, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00438-X

T. Utsunomiya, T. Naitou, and M. Nagaki, A prospective trial of blastocyst culture and transfer, Human Reproduction, vol.17, issue.7, pp.1846-51, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1846

J. D. Biggers and M. C. Summers, Choosing a culture medium: making informed choices, Fertility and Sterility, vol.90, issue.3, pp.473-83, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.010

F. Dominguez, B. Gadea, P. J. Mercader, . Esteban, C. Pellicer et al., Embryologie outcome and secretome profile of implanted blastocysts obtained after coculture in human endometrial epithelial cells versus the sequential system, Fertil Steril, issue.3, pp.93-774, 2010.

C. Bergh, C. Werner, L. Nilsson, and L. Hamberger, Cumulative birth rates following cryopreservation of all embryos in stimulatedin vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.100, issue.3, pp.191-195, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02211797

J. T. Queenan, L. L. Jr, J. P. Veeck, S. Toner, S. J. Oehninger et al., Cryopreservation of ail prezygotes in patients at risk of severe hyperstimulation does not eliminate the syndrome, but the chances of pregnancy are excellent with subsequent frozen-thaw transfers, Hum Reprod, issue.7, pp.12-1573, 1997.

A. Trounson, Preservation of human eggs and embryos, Fertil Steril, vol.46, issue.1, pp.1-12, 1986.

A. Trounson and L. Mohr, Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo, Nature, vol.38, issue.5936, pp.707-716, 1983.
DOI : 10.1038/305707a0

J. Cohen, R. F. Simons, R. G. Edwards, C. B. Fehilly, and S. B. , Pregnanciesfollowing the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts, J In Vitro Pert Embryo Transf, issue.22, pp.59-64, 1985.

Y. Menezo, B. Nicollet, N. Herbaut, and D. Andre, Freezing cocultured human blastocysts, Fertility and Sterility, vol.58, issue.5, pp.977-80, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55445-4

E. Van-den-abbeel, M. Camus, G. Verheyen, L. Van-waesberghe, P. Devroey et al., Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies, Human Reproduction, vol.20, issue.10, pp.20-2939, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dei134

M. Youssry, B. Ozmen, K. Zohni, K. Diedrich, and S. , Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.16, issue.2, pp.311-331, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60591-3

K. Pantos, E. Makrakis, D. Stavrou, P. Karantzis, T. Vaxevanoglou et al., Comparison of embryo transfer on day 2, day 3, and day 6: a prospective randomized study, Fertility and Sterility, vol.81, issue.2, pp.81-454, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.016

Y. A. Wang, M. Chapman, M. Costello, and B. A. Sullivan, Better perinatal outcomes following transfer of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos: a population-based study, Human Reproduction, vol.25, issue.6, pp.25-1536, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deq067

F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M. H. Saussereau et al., Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers, Human Reproduction, vol.24, issue.5, pp.24-1051, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dep018

E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, E. M. Kolibianakis, L. Van-landuyt, P. Van-steirteghem et al., In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos, N Engl J Med, issue.11, pp.354-1139, 2006.

N. H. Zech, B. Lejeune, F. Puissant, S. Vanderzwalmen, H. Zech et al., Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5, Fertility and Sterility, vol.88, issue.1, pp.244-250, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.070

E. Stehlik, J. Stehlik, K. P. Katayama, M. Kuwayama, V. Jambor et al., Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezing of human blastocysts, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.11, issue.1, pp.53-60, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61298-9

K. Takahashi, T. Mukaida, T. Goto, and C. Oka, Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: A 4-year follow-up study, Fertility and Sterility, vol.84, issue.1, pp.88-92, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.051

Y. Menezo, J. Chouteau, and A. Veiga, In vitro fertilization and blastocyst transfer for carriers of chromosomal translocation, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.96, issue.2, pp.193-198, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00465-6

M. C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, A. P. Ferraretti, M. Lappi, A. Ruberti et al., Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement, Fertility and Sterility, vol.87, issue.3, pp.534-575, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1512

F. Guerif, B. Le-gouge, J. Giraudeau, R. Poindron, O. Bidault et al., Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 ta predict blastocyst development potential: a prospective study based on 4042 embryos, Hum Reprod, issue.7, pp.22-1973, 2007.

M. C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, S. Munne, and A. P. Ferraretti, Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.15, issue.5, pp.297-301, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1022596528036

M. C. Magli, G. M. Jones, L. Gras, and L. Gianaroli, Karman and A.O. Trounson, Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro, HumReprod, vol.1, issue.8, pp.15-1781, 2000.

J. Graham, T. Han, R. Porter, M. Levy, R. Stillman et al., Day 3 morphology is a poor predictor of blastocyst quality in extended culture, Fertility and Sterility, vol.74, issue.3, pp.74-495, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00689-0

P. M. Rijnders and C. A. Jansen, The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Human Reproduction, vol.13, issue.10, pp.13-2869, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2869

E. R. Norwitz, D. J. Schust, and S. J. Fisher, Implantation and the Survival of Early Pregnancy, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.345, issue.19, pp.345-1400, 2001.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMra000763

J. Pereda and H. B. Croxatto, Human preimplantation development in vivo: ultrastructural observations, pp.480-488, 1992.

D. Valbuena, J. Marti, J. L. De-pablo, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer et al., L-vzcreasing levels of estradiot are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they direct/y affect the embryo, Fertil Steril, vol.111, issue.5, pp.76-962, 2001.

D. De-ziegler, C. Bulletti, R. Fanchin, M. Epiney, and P. A. Brioschi, Contractility of the Nonpregnant Uterus, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.47, issue.1, pp.172-84, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03801.x

R. Fanchin, J. M. Ayoubi, C. Righini, F. Olivennes, L. M. Schonauer et al., Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers, Human Reproduction, vol.16, issue.6, pp.16-1115, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1115

J. A. Land and J. L. Evers, Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of anESHRE consensus meeting. HumReprod, pp.455-462, 2003.

D. Marek, M. Langley, D. K. Gardner, N. Confer, K. M. Doody et al., Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for al! patients in an in vitro fertilization program, Fertil Steril, issue.6, pp.72-1035, 1999.

M. Tsirigotis, Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice?, Human Reproduction, vol.13, issue.12, pp.3285-3294, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285

URL : http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/13/12/3285

E. M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, W. Verpoest, M. Camus, H. Joris et al., Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer? Hum Reprod, pp.19-2550, 2004.

M. Alikani, G. Calderon, G. Tomkin, J. Garrisi, M. Kokot et al., Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro, Human Reproduction, vol.15, issue.12, pp.15-2634, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2634

C. Racowsky, K. V. Jackson, N. A. Cekleniak, J. H. Fox, M. D. Hornstein et al., The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer, Fertility and Sterility, vol.73, issue.3, pp.73-558, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00565-8

S. Vitthala, T. A. Gelbaya, D. R. Brison, C. T. Fitzgerald, and L. G. Nardo, The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Human Reproduction Update, vol.15, issue.1, pp.45-55, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmn045

Y. J. Menezo, J. Chouteau, J. Torello, A. Girard, and A. Veiga, Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans, Fertility and Sterility, vol.72, issue.2, pp.221-225, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00256-3

E. S. Sills, M. J. Tucker, and G. D. Palermo, Assisted reproductive technologies and monozygous twins: implications for future study and clinical practice, Twin Research, vol.13, issue.04, pp.217-240, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/mrd.1080300110

M. Meintjes, S. S. Crider-pirkle, D. C. Ward, J. A. Rodriguez, S. J. Chantilis et al., Sex ratio and birthweight outcome when considering blastocyst expansion, multiple gestation, andfacility. Fertility and sterility, pp.76-123, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02430-x

H. F. Rodriguez, M. Bustillo, J. Lapalme, E. Riley, J. Eisermann et al., Clinical outcomes with transfer of blastocyst or cleavage stage embryos: high order pregnancies, newborn weights and sex ratios., Fertility and Sterility, vol.76, issue.3, p.76, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02502-X

M. Anderson, J. Graham, M. Tucker, T. Krecko, M. J. Levy et al., Comparison of gender and birth weight following day-three and blastocyst transfers., Fertility and Sterility, vol.76, issue.3, pp.76-179, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02526-2

A. Mercader, P. Gamiz, M. D. Santos, J. Remohii, A. Pellicer et al., Sex ratio after day 2, day 3 or blastocyst transfer., Fertility and Sterility, vol.76, issue.3, pp.76-261, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02784-4

M. Wilson, K. Hartke, M. Kjelij, J. Rodgers, C. Brabec et al., Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients, Fertility and Sterility, vol.77, issue.4, pp.693-699, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03235-6

A. Kausche, G. M. Jones, A. O. Trounson, F. Figueiredo, V. Maclachlan et al., Sex ratio and birth weights of infants barn as a result of blastocyst transfers compared with early cleavage stage embryo transfers, Fertil Steril, issue.4, pp.76-688, 2001.

A. A. Milki, S. H. Jun, M. D. Hinckley, L. W. Westphal, L. C. Giudice et al., Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer, J Assist Reprod Genet, issue.8, pp.20-323, 2003.

P. Y. Lin, F. J. Huang, F. T. Kung, L. J. Wang, S. Y. Chang et al., Comparison of the Offspring Sex Ratio Between Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer and Blastocyst Transfer, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.49, issue.1, pp.49-84, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60006-X

D. A. Blake, C. M. Farquhar, N. Johnson, and M. Proctor, Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, issue.4, p.2118, 2007.

E. G. Papanikolaou, E. D. Haeseleer, G. Verheyen, H. Van-de-velde, M. Camus et al., Live birth rate is signi.ficantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study, Hum Reprod, issue.11, pp.20-3198, 2005.

J. L. Frattarelli, M. P. Leondires, J. L. Mckeeby, B. T. Miller, and J. H. Segars, Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial, Fertility and Sterility, vol.79, issue.1, pp.79-228, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04558-2

J. Levron, A. Shulman, D. Eider, D. Seidman, T. Levin et al., A prospective randomized study comparing day 3 with blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, Fertility and Sterility, vol.77, issue.6, pp.77-1300, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03090-X

R. Z. Karaki, S. S. Samarraie, N. A. Younis, T. M. Lahloub, and M. H. Ibrahim, Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome, Fertility and Sterility, vol.77, issue.1, pp.114-122, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02939-9

D. K. Gardner, W. B. Schoolcraft, L. Wagley, T. Schlenker, J. Stevens et al., A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization, Human Reproduction, vol.13, issue.12, pp.13-3434, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434

L. Rienzi, F. Ubaldi, M. Iacobelli, S. Ferrero, M. G. Minasi et al., Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer, Human Reproduction, vol.17, issue.7, pp.17-1852, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1852

J. Hreinsson, B. Rosenlund, M. Fridstrom, I. Ek, L. Levkov et al., Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.117, issue.2, pp.117-194, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.011

M. Bungum, L. Bungum, P. Humaidan, and C. Andersen, Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.7, issue.1, pp.98-104, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61736-1

S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, J. Vannin, M. Biramane, Y. Verdoodt et al., Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos bath cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study, Hum Reprod, issue.10, pp.18-2145, 2003.

I. Van-der-auwera, S. Debrock, C. Spiessens, H. Afschrift, E. Bakelants et al., A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo 1-vr<~ pf'nv Unn-1, '){\{\') 1 '7 f hÎ ? n 1 t::..f\'7 _ 1 ')

S. Coskun, J. Hollanders, S. Al-hassan, H. Al-sufyan, H. Al-mayman et al., Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial, Human Reproduction, vol.15, issue.9, pp.15-1947, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/15.9.1947

E. Levitas, E. Lunenfeld, I. Har-vardi, S. Albotiano, Y. Sonin et al., Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2???3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study, Fertility and Sterility, vol.81, issue.3, pp.81-567, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.031

F. Guerif, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M. L. Couet, O. Gervereau et al., Efficacy of blastocyst transfer after implantationfailure, Reprod Biomed Online, issue.96, pp.630-636, 2004.

G. M. Jones, . Ao, N. Trounson, C. Lolatgis, and . Wood, Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer 11Portions of these data were previously published in Jones et al. (7)., Fertility and Sterility, vol.70, issue.6, pp.1022-1031, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00342-2

L. L. Veeck, R. Bodine, R. N. Clarke, R. Berrias, J. Libraro et al., High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts, Fertil Steril, issue.5, pp.82-1418, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.068

V. A. Moragianni, J. D. Cohen, S. E. Smith, J. S. Schinfeld, S. G. Somkuti et al., Outcomes of day-1, day-3, and blastocyst cryopreserved embryo transfers, Fertil Steril, issue.4, pp.93-1353, 2010.

Y. A. Wang, G. Kovacs, and E. Sullivan, Transfer of a selected single blastocyst optimizes the chance of a healthy term baby: a retrospective population based study in Australia, 2004.

E. D. Levens, B. W. Whitcomb, S. Hennessy, A. James, B. J. Yauger et al., Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles, Fertility and Sterility, vol.90, issue.6, pp.90-2138, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.029

B. Behr, J. Gebhardt, J. Lyon, and A. A. Milki, Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program, Fertility and Sterility, vol.77, issue.4, pp.697-706, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03267-8

K. S. Richter, S. K. Shipley, I. Mcvearry, M. J. Tucker, and B. A. Widra, Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos, Fertility and Sterility, vol.86, issue.4, pp.862-868, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.114