Recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques 2013 du CCAFU: Diagnostic, traitement et suivi des cancers urologiques chez l???homme et la femme, Progr??s en Urologie, vol.23, issue.2, pp.51-54, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1166-7087(13)70046-0
Prostate-specific antigen measured 3??months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence, International Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.59, issue.1, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10147-014-0681-7
Salvage Radiotherapy for Isolated Prostate Specific Antigen Increase After Radical Prostatectomy: Evaluation of Prognostic Factors and Creation of a Prognostic Scoring System, The Journal of Urology, vol.176, issue.3, pp.985-90, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.083
Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.25, issue.15, pp.2035-2076, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9607
Radiation therapy for T1 and T2 prostate cancer: Prostate-specific antigen and disease outcome, Urology, vol.45, issue.3, pp.476-83, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80019-3
Salvage radiation in men after prostate?specific antigen failure and the risk of death. Cancer, pp.3925-3957, 2011. ,
Salvage or adjuvant radiation therapy: counseling patients on the benefits, J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN Feb, vol.8, issue.2, pp.228-265, 2010. ,
IMPACT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS ON PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AND THE USE OF SECONDARY CANCER TREATMENT: DATA FROM THE CAPSURE DATABASE, The Journal of Urology, vol.163, issue.4, pp.1171-1177, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67716-6
Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organconfined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy, Urology, vol.50, issue.5, pp.733-742, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00450-0
Prognostic Significance of Location of Positive Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens, Urology, vol.70, issue.5, pp.965-974, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.040
Prediction of Progression Following Radical Prostatectomy, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.20, issue.3, pp.286-92, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-199603000-00004
Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease, J Urol, vol.152, issue.5, pp.1826-1856, 1994. ,
CANCER RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL RATES AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER, The Journal of Urology, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-199812020-00012
LONG-TERM BIOCHEMICAL DISEASE-FREE AND CANCER-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL FOLLOWING ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY, Urologic Clinics of North America, vol.28, issue.3, pp.555-65, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70163-4
Long?term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer, J Urol, vol.152, issue.5 2, pp.1850-1857, 1994. ,
Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality, World Journal of Urology, vol.68, issue.4, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-013-1230-0
Natural History of Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy Based on Length of a Positive Margin, Urology, vol.71, issue.2, pp.308-320, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.042
Ability of Linear Length of Positive Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens to Predict Biochemical Recurrence, Urology, vol.77, issue.6, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.059
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robotic?assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow?up time of five years, BJU Int, 2013. ,
Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer, pp.1215-1224, 2002. ,
Location, Extent and Number of Positive Surgical Margins Do Not Improve Accuracy of Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy, The Journal of Urology, vol.182, issue.4, pp.1357-63, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.046
The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.34, issue.7, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e103bf
Tumor Grade at Margins of Resection in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis, Urology, vol.76, issue.5, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.090
High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy, BJU International, vol.25, issue.12, pp.1794-800 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x
Prognostic Impact of Subclassification of Radical Prostatectomy Positive Margins by Linear Extent and Gleason Grade, The Journal of Urology, vol.189, issue.4, pp.1302-1309 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.004
Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer, BJU International, vol.5, issue.6 Pt 1, pp.921-928 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11665.x
Purification of a human prostate specific antigen, The Journal of Urology, vol.167, issue.2, pp.960-964, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(02)80311-1
Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.324, issue.17, pp.1156-61, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199104253241702
A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, J Urol, 1995. ,
State T1???2 prostate cancer: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol.37, issue.5, pp.1043-52, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00590-1
Ability of preoperative serum prostatespecific antigen value to predict pathologic stage and DNA ploidy Influence of clinical stage and tumor grade, Urology, vol.41, issue.3, pp.207-223, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90558-R
Prostate specific antigen in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of localized prostatic cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, J Urol, vol.139, issue.4, pp.766-72, 1988. ,
Prostate-Specific Antigen, JAMA, vol.267, issue.16, pp.907-930, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1992.03480160094042
Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy, J Urol, vol.149, issue.3, pp.516-524, 1993. ,
Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: Relationship to local and distant spread, Human Pathology, vol.23, issue.3, pp.258-66, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90106-D
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012, European Radiology, vol.19, issue.3 Pt 1, pp.746-57 ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3297750
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM, Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol.17, issue.6, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4
CANCER CONTROL WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ALONE IN 1,000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS, The Journal of Urology, vol.167, issue.2, pp.528-562, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69079-7
Analysis of Risk Factors for Progression in Patients with Pathologically Confined Prostate Cancers After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy, The Journal of Urology, vol.156, issue.1, pp.137-180, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65967-6
Subclassification of Clinical Stage T1 Prostate Cancer: Impact on Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy, The Journal of Urology, vol.178, issue.4, pp.1277-1280, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.153
Minimal Impact of Clinical Stage on Prostate Cancer Prognosis Among Contemporary Patients With Clinically Localized Disease, The Journal of Urology, vol.184, issue.1, pp.114-123, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.025
Classification of prostatic carcinomas, Cancer Chemother Rep, vol.50, issue.3, pp.125-133, 1966. ,
Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading System, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol.136, issue.4, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.5858/arpa.2011-0495-RA
Gleason grading: past, present and future, Histopathology, vol.54, issue.Suppl., pp.75-86, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04003.x
Secondary biological recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multivariate analysis of prognostic clinical, biological, and histologic factors], Prog En Urol J Assoc Fr Urol Société Fr Urol, vol.11, issue.2, pp.277-82, 2001. ,
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system, BJU International, vol.186, issue.5, pp.753-60, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x
Natural History of Pathologically Organ-Confined (pT2), Gleason Score 6 or Less, Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, Urology, vol.72, issue.1, pp.172-178, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.055
Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy???long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer, World Journal of Urology, vol.165, issue.4, pp.273-80, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-006-0058-2
Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Biochemical Progression after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Pathologically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer, Urologia Internationalis, vol.76, issue.3, pp.202-210, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000091619
Should Gleason score 7 prostate cancer be considered a unique grade category? Urology, 1999. ,
Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy, Urology, vol.56, issue.5, pp.823-830, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00753-6
Early prostate cancer detection and potential for surgical cure in men with poorly differentiated tumors, Urology, vol.52, issue.1, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00154-X
Can radical prostatectomy alter the progression of poorly differentiated prostate cancer? J Urol, pp.1843-1852, 1994. ,
Heterogeneity of prostate cancer inradical prostatectomy specimens, Urology, vol.43, issue.1, pp.60-66, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80264-5
A Tertiary Gleason Pattern in the Prostatectomy Specimen and its Association with Adverse Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy, The Journal of Urology, vol.192, issue.1, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.029
Significance of Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Gleason Score 7 Radical Prostatectomy Specimens, The Journal of Urology, vol.179, issue.2, pp.516-522, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.085
The Prognostic Significance of Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.28, issue.3, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00014
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume, Modern Pathology, vol.125, issue.1, pp.16-25, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04555.x
Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup, J Urol, 1993. ,
Biological Determinants of Cancer Progression in Men With Prostate Cancer, JAMA, vol.281, issue.15, pp.1395-400, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.281.15.1395
PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE APICAL SECTION DETERMINED BY WHOLE MOUNT HISTOLOGY, The Journal of Urology, vol.161, issue.2, pp.500-504, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61935-9
Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score, BJU International, vol.105, issue.Suppl., 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1111/bju.12424
PATHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF THE SURGICAL SPECIMEN, Urologic Clinics of North America, vol.28, issue.3, pp.567-94, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70164-6
Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer, pp.3582-93, 1993. ,
Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression, Urology, vol.62, issue.2, pp.304-313, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00373-X
The Mechanisms and Prognostic Significance of Seminal Vesicle Involvement by Prostate Cancer, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.17, issue.12, pp.1252-61, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-199312000-00006
Re-evaluating the biological significance of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in locally advanced prostate cancer, BJU International, vol.56, issue.4, pp.58-63, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11477.x
The Prostatic Capsule, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.21-28, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-198901000-00003
CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTS, The Journal of Urology, vol.172, issue.3, pp.910-914, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb
Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1???2 prostate cancer, Human Pathology, vol.29, issue.8, pp.856-62, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90457-9
Working group 5: surgical margins, ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens, pp.48-57, 2011. ,
USE OF GLEASON SCORE, PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, SEMINAL VESICLE AND MARGIN STATUS TO PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, The Journal of Urology, vol.165, issue.1, pp.119-144, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00030
The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era, The Journal of Urology, vol.183, issue.3, pp.1003-1012, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.039
DO MARGINS MATTER? THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS, The Journal of Urology, vol.174, issue.3, pp.903-910, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.ju.0000169475.00949.78
Influence of dna ploidy and adjuvant treatment on progression and survival in patients with pathologic stage T3 (PT3) prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy, Urology, vol.46, issue.3, pp.356-64, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80220-9
Stage C Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Flow Cytometric Nuclear DNA Ploidy Analysis, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol.64, issue.8, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61218-X
Stage B Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Archives of Surgery, vol.125, issue.3, pp.327-358, 1960. ,
DOI : 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410150049010
Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: Deoxyribonucleic Acid Ploidy Analysis as a Predictor of Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Stage T2 Disease, The Journal of Urology, vol.153, issue.3, pp.1015-1024, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67625-0
Histologic Grade, DNA Ploidy, and Intraglandular Tumor Extent as Indicators of Tumor Progression of Clinical Stage B Prostatic Carcinoma, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.15, issue.12, pp.1165-70, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-199112000-00007
DNA content in prostatic adenocarcinoma. A flow cytometry study of the predictive value of aneuploidy for tumor volume, percentage Gleason grade 4 and 5, and lymph node metastases. Cancer, pp.752-759, 1990. ,
Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies, J Urol, vol.139, issue.6, pp.1235-1276, 1988. ,
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.37, issue.282, p.457, 1958. ,
DOI : 10.1214/aoms/1177731566
Partial likelihood, Biometrika, vol.62, issue.2, pp.269-76, 1975. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/62.2.269
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, 2004. ,
Postoperative Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy A Review, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol.37, issue.1, pp.10-15, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1080/00365590310008613
Phase III Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Radical Prostatectomy Alone in pT3 Prostate Cancer With Postoperative Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.27, issue.18, pp.2924-2954, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9563
Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet, pp.572-580, 2005. ,
Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Pathologically Advanced Prostate Cancer, JAMA, vol.296, issue.19 ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.296.19.2329