!. H. Hedden, !. Controlled, . Vocabularies, !. Thesauri, and !. Taxonomies, ! The! Indexer.! 1! mars, p.334, 2008.

L. 'homme, !. M. La, and !. Terminologie, !principes!et!techniques, !PUM, 2004.

!. Shortliffe, !. Eh, !. Cimino, . Jj, !. Biomedical et al., !computer!applications!in!health!care! and!biomedicine, 2006.

!. Jj, !Review!paper:!coding!systems!in!health!care, !Methods!Inf!Med.!déc!, vol.35, p.27384, 1996.

!. Levy, !Evolving!to!clinical!terminology, !J!Healthc!Inf!Manag.!, vol.18, issue.3, p.3743, 2004.

!. D. Kalra, !. B. Fernando, !. Morrison, !. Z. , !. Sheikh et al., A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care, Informatics in Primary Care, vol.20, issue.3, pp.171-80
DOI : 10.14236/jhi.v20i3.22

!. Rose, !. Js, !. Fisch, . Bj, !. Hogan et al., Common!medical! terminology!comes!of!age,!Part!One:!Standard!language!improves!healthcare!quality, ! J!Healthc!Inf!Manag.!, vol.15, issue.3, p.30718, 2001.

!. J. Dudeck, ! Changes! in! Medical! Documentation! over! the! Last! Five! Decades, ! Stud! Health!Technol!Inform.!, vol.134, p.25563, 2008.

!. F. Rodeghiero, !. Stasi, !. R. , !. Gernsheimer, !. T. Michel et al., Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group, Blood, vol.113, issue.11, p.238693, 2009.
DOI : 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503

!. Blair, . Dr, !. K. Wang, !. Nestorov, !. S. et al., Quantifying the Impact and Extent of Undocumented Biomedical Synonymy, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.39, issue.1, p.1003799, 2014.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003799.s014

!. Cimino and . Jj, ! Desiderata! for! Controlled! Medical! Vocabularies! in! the! Twenty1First! Century, !Methods!Inf!Med.!nov!, vol.37, issue.415, p.394403, 1998.

!. J. Ingenerf, !. Reiner, !. J. , !. Seik, and !. , Standardized terminological services enabling semantic interoperability between distributed and heterogeneous systems, International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol.64, issue.2-3, p.22340, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00211-8

!. O. Bodenreider, The! Unified! Medical! Language! System! (UMLS):! integrating! biomedical!terminology.!Nucl!Acids!Res.!1!janv, p.26770, 2004.

!. S. Zhang and !. Bodenreider, !Experience!in!Aligning!Anatomical!Ontologies, !Int!J!Semant! Web!Inf!Syst.!, vol.3, issue.2, p.126, 2007.

!. Association, !. , !. Développement, !. Informatique, !. et al., !Édition!19991Version°!41 99/1.pdf.! Dernière! mise! à! jour! :! février! 1999! (disponible! sur! http://www.adicap.asso.fr/).! 16. International! Classification! of! Diseases! (ICD), 2014.

!. J. Golbeck, !. Fragoso, !. G. , !. Hartel, !. F. et al., !The!National!Cancer! Institute's!Thesaurus!and!Ontology.!Web!Semantics:!Science, 2015.

!. Fritz and . Ag, ! International! Classification! of! Diseases! for! Oncology:! ICD1O.! World! Health! Organization, 2000.

!. Côté, !. Ra, and !. S. Robboy, Progress in medical information management. Systematized nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED), JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.243, issue.8, p.7561762, 1980.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.243.8.756

!. Hole, !. Wt, and !. Srinivasan, ! Discovering! missed! synonymy! in! a! large! concept1oriented! Metathesaurus, !Proc!AMIA!Symp.!, vol.3548, 2000.

!. U. Miller, !. Teitelbaum, and !. , ! Pre1coordination! and! post1coordination:! Past! and! future.! Knowledge!organization, !, vol.29, issue.2, p.8793, 2002.

!. W. Ceusters, !. B. Smith, !. Goldberg, and !. L. , A!terminological!and!ontological!analysis!of!the!NCI! Thesaurus, !Methods!Inf!Med.!déc!, vol.44, issue.4, p.498507, 2004.

!. Jensen, !. Om, !. Parkin, !. Dm, !. R. Maclennan et al., ! Cancer! registration:! principles!and!methods, 1991.

!. Fung, !. Kw, and !. Bodenreider, ! Utilizing! the! UMLS! for! semantic! mapping! between! terminologies, !AMIA!AnnuSymp!Proc.!, vol.266170, 2005.

!. A. Burgun and !. Bodenreider, ! Issues! in! integrating! epidemiology! and! research! information! in! oncology:! experience! with! ICD1O3! and! the! NCI! Thesaurus, AMIA! AnnuSymp!Proc.!, 2007.

!. Aronson and . Ar, !Effective!mapping!of!biomedical!text!to!the!UMLS!Metathesaurus:!the! MetaMap!program, !Proc!AMIA!Symp.!, vol.1721, 2001.

!. Wang, !. Yefeng, . !. Snomed-!-ct-!-snomed-!-ct, !. S. Coronado, !. Wright et al., Linguistic!mapping!of!Terminologies!to The! NCI! Thesaurus! quality! assurance! life! cycle, Semantic! Mining!Conference!on, pp.530-539, 2006.

!. Patton, . Mq, !. Qualitative, and !. Research, Evaluation! Methods:! Integrating! Theory! and! Practice

T. B. Murdoch and A. S. Detsky, The Inevitable Application of Big Data to Health Care, JAMA, vol.309, issue.13, pp.1351-1352, 2013.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2013.393

H. U. Prokosch and T. Ganslandt, « Perspectives for medical informatics Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research, Methods Inf. Med, vol.48, issue.1, pp.38-44, 2009.

C. Safran, M. Bloomrosen, W. E. Hammond, S. Labkoff, S. Markel-fox et al., Toward a National Framework for the Secondary Use of Health Data: An American Medical Informatics Association White Paper, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol.14, issue.1, pp.1-9, 2007.
DOI : 10.1197/jamia.M2273

T. Botsis, G. Hartvigsen, and F. Chen, Weng, « Secondary Use of EHR: Data Quality Issues and Informatics Opportunities, AMIA Summits Transl. Sci. Proc, vol.2010, pp.1-5, 2010.

C. Barton, C. Kallem, P. Van-dyke, D. Mon, E. R. Richesson et al., Collect once, Use Many " ? Assimilating Public Health Secondary Data Use Requirements into an Existing Domain Analysis Model, AMIA. Annu. Symp. Proc, vol.2011, pp.98-107, 2011.

A. Fadly, B. Rance, N. Lucas, C. Mead, G. Chatellier et al., Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: From the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol.44, pp.94-102, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.007

R. Black, L. Simonato, H. Storm, and E. Démaret, International Agency for Research on Cancer Automated data collection in cancer registration, 1998.

V. Jouhet, G. Defossez, and P. Ingrand, Automated Selection of Relevant Information for Notification of Incident Cancer Cases within a Multisource Cancer Registry, Methods of Information in Medicine, vol.52, issue.5, 2013.
DOI : 10.3414/ME12-01-0101

S. Tognazzo, B. Emanuela, F. A. Rita, G. Stefano, M. Daniele et al., Probabilistic classifiers and automated cancer registration: An exploratory application, Probabilistic classifiers and automated cancer registration: An exploratory application, pp.1-10, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.06.002

S. Tognazzo, A. Andolfo, E. Bovo, A. R. Fiore, A. Greco et al., Quality control of automatically defined cancer cases by the automated registration system of the Venetian Tumour Registry: Quality control of cancer cases automatically registered, The European Journal of Public Health, vol.15, issue.6, pp.657-664, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/eurpub/cki035

P. Contiero, A. Tittarelli, A. Maghini, S. Fabiano, E. Frassoldi et al., Comparison with manual registration reveals satisfactory completeness and efficiency of a computerized cancer registration system, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.24-32, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.03.003

G. Tagliabue, A. Maghini, S. Fabiano, A. Tittarelli, E. Frassoldi et al., Consistency and accuracy of diagnostic cancer codes generated by automated registration: comparison with manual registration, Population Health Metrics, vol.68, issue.5, pp.10-10, 2006.
DOI : 10.1038/bjc.1993.464

W. Organization, International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, World Health, vol.1, 2004.

A. Fritz, . World-health, and . Organization, International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O, 2013.

W. Ceusters, B. Smith, and L. Goldberg, A terminological and ontological analysis of the NCI Thesaurus, Methods Inf Med, vol.44, p.498, 2005.

A. Kumar and B. Smith, Oncology Ontology in the NCI Thesaurus, Artif. Intell. Med, pp.213-233, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11527770_30

S. Schulz, D. Schober, and I. Tudose, Stenzhorn, « The Pitfalls of Thesaurus Ontologization ? the Case of the NCI Thesaurus, AMIA. Annu. Symp. Proc, vol.2010, pp.727-731, 2010.

N. Thesaurus, EVS -National Cancer Institute -Confluence Wiki n.d. https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display, EVSNCI+Thesaurus+(NCIt), 2015.

G. Héja, G. Surján, and P. Varga, Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol.8, issue.Suppl 1, pp.10-1186, 2008.
DOI : 10.1186/1472-6947-8-S1-S8

O. Bodenreider, B. Smith, A. Kumar, and A. Burgun, Investigating subsumption in SNOMED CT: An exploration into large description logic-based biomedical terminologies, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol.39, issue.3, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.12.003

!. Je, !. , !. , !. , and !. Volonté, ! sans! aucune!discrimination!selon!leur!état!ou!leurs!convictions.!J'interviendrai!pour! les!protéger!si!elles!sont!affaiblies

!. Contexte, il faut être en mesure de mettre en correspondance les diagnostics semblables entre eux, codées à l'aide de ces différentes terminologies, c'est à dire de rattacher sous un même concept des codes différents, et ce sans modification ou perte d'information. Le NCI thesaurus (NCIt) a semblé être une terminologie de choix pour l'élaboration d'une terminologie pivot afin de représenter de manière consensuelle et centralisée les concepts des différentes terminologies diagnostiques en cancérologie. La CIM-O3 a été choisie pour débuter le travail de mapping vers cette terminologie cible. OBJECTIF : L'objectif était d'évaluer la possibilité de représenter les données diagnostiques d'un registre général des cancers de l'adulte grâce à des concepts du NCIt, par l'intermédiaire d'un mapping validé établi préalablement entre la CIM-O3 et le NCIt et des relations existant entre les concepts du NCIt. METHODE : Une première phase a consisté en l'élaboration d'un mapping de la CIM-O3 vers le NCIt. La seconde phase s'est attachée à évaluer la possibilité de représenter les diagnostics réels du Registre Général des Cancers de la Gironde (RGCG), codés en CIM-O3, avec des concepts du NCIt. Pour chaque phase, une validation manuelle par une équipe de médecins a été réalisée, Plusieurs terminologies sont utilisées en routine pour coder les diagnostics de cancer. Pour pouvoir utiliser conjointement des informations issues de différentes sources RESULTATS : Au 31 janvier 2015, la validation par l'équipe de médecins avait permis d'obtenir 605 mappings valides d'un code CIM-O3 vers un code NCIt (40,3 % des 1500 codes CIM-O3). Il existait, pp.694-52