N. Item, Les méthodes de mesure sont-elles explicitement et précisément nommées (pas seulement en abréviation) et décrites? 72 articles sur 80

. Contre-exemple, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR renography for Renal Function evaluation in Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Feasibility Study, AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol.27

N. Item, 6 : L'affection est-elle bien définie? 73 articles sur 80 (soit 92%) respectent ce point

N. Item, Pour la population étudiée: les méthodes d'inclusion sont-elles bien décrites? 73 articles sur 80 (soit 89%) respectent ce point

. Contre-exemple, « Ultrasound evaluation of gallbladder dyskinesia: comparison of scintigraphy and dynamic 3D and 4D ultrasound techniques, p.31

N. Item, Pour l'échantillon de la population étudiée : le nombre de sujets dans l'échantillon étudié est-il défini ? 80 articles sur 80

N. Item, Pour l'échantillon de la population étudiée: avons-nous l'information précise sur la distribution de l'âge (moyenne et médiane) dans la population étudiée ? 76 articles sur 80 (soit 95%

. Contre-exemple, Utility of salivagram in pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients: comparison of salivagram and chest radiography, AJR Am J Roentgenol», vol.35

N. Item, Avons-nous l'information précise sur le sexe ratio? 77 articles sur 80 (soit 96%) respectent ce point

. Contre-exemple, Utility of salivagram in pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients: comparison of salivagram and chest radiography, AJR Am J Roentgenol», vol.35

. Contre-exemple, «A prospective study comparing whole-body FDG PET/CT to combined planar bone scan with 67Ga SPECT/CT in the Diagnosis of Spondylodiskitis»

. Contre-exemple, «Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG- PET/CT»

N. Item, 25 Est-ce que le nombre de sujets analysés est identique à celui du nombre de sujets inclus dans l'étude? 75 articles sur 80

N. Item, 26 Existe-t-il un tableau récapitulant les motifs de sortie de l'essai ?

. En and . Dans, un patient a été exclu de l'analyse car un clip chirurgical intracérébral avait été posé entrainant une extinction de signal en Angio-IRM avec TOF, ce qui n

N. Item, 28 Existe-t-il une ou des déviation(s) au protocole?

N. Item, 29 Existe-t-il une pertinence clinique de l'interprétation ?

P. A. John and . Ioannidis, Why Most Published Research Findings Are False? PLoS Medicine, 2005.

C. M. George and . Ioannidis, External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination, J Clin Epidemiol. 2015, vol.68, issue.1, pp.25-34

F. Prinz, T. Schlange, and K. Asadullah, Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol.28, issue.9
DOI : 10.1038/nrd3439-c1

C. Begley and L. Ellis, Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research, Nature, vol.483, issue.7391, pp.531-533, 2012.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271

I. Peers, P. Ceuppens, and C. Harbron, In search of preclinical robustness, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol.82, issue.10, pp.733-734, 2012.
DOI : 10.1038/nrd3849

I. Chalmers and P. Glasziou, Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence, The Lancet, vol.374, issue.9683, pp.86-89, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9

R. Tibshirani, Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis, Lancet, vol.383, pp.166-175, 2014.

K. Tsilidis, O. Panagiotou, E. Sena, E. Aretouli, E. Evangelou et al., Evaluation of Excess Significance Bias in Animal Studies of Neurological Diseases, PLoS Biology, vol.327, issue.7, p.1001609, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001609.s001

S. Perrin, Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work, Nature, vol.507, issue.7493, pp.423-425, 2014.
DOI : 10.1038/507423a

J. Ioannidis, D. Allison, and C. Ball, Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses, Nature Genetics, vol.4, issue.2, pp.149-155, 2009.
DOI : 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7

J. Sterne, D. Smith, and G. , Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods, BMJ, vol.322, issue.7280, pp.226-231, 2001.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226

S. Wacholder, S. Chanock, M. Garcia-closas, L. El-ghormli, and N. Rothman, Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.96, issue.6, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djh075

P. Bossuyt, Toward Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol.119, issue.1, pp.575-80, 2003.
DOI : 10.1309/8EXCCM6YR1THUBAF

J. Fermanian, Mesure de l'agrément entre deux observateurs, cas qualitatif, Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique, vol.32, pp.140-147, 1984.

D. Journois, Concordance de deux variables : l???approche graphique, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires, vol.21, issue.1, pp.127-157, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0761-8425(04)71243-7

C. Fuhrman and C. Chouaïd, Concordance de deux variables : les approches num??riques, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires, vol.21, issue.1
DOI : 10.1016/S0761-8425(04)71242-5

N. Rognant, J. Bacchetta, and L. Juillard, Comparaison des m??thodes d???estimation d???un param??tre quantitatif??: ??valuation de la concordance, N??phrologie & Th??rapeutique, vol.9, issue.2
DOI : 10.1016/j.nephro.2012.09.007

J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol.47, issue.8, pp.307-310, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001

D. Cicchetti and A. Feinstein, High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.43, issue.6, pp.551-559, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M

A. Feinstein and D. Cicchetti, High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.43, issue.6, pp.543-552, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L

G. G. Koch, Intraclass correlation coefficient, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol.4, pp.213-217, 1982.
DOI : 10.1002/0471667196.ess1275

P. E. Shrout, &. Joseph, and L. Fleiss, Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability., Psychological Bulletin, vol.86, issue.2, pp.420-428, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

J. Kottner, Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.64, issue.1, pp.96-106, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002

F. Minutoli, D. Bella, G. Mazzeo, A. Donato, R. Russo et al., Comparison between (99m)Tc-diphosphonate imaging and MRI with late gadolinium enhancement in evaluating cardiac involvement in patients with transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy, AJR Am J Roentgenol, issue.3, pp.256-65, 0200.

K. Krepkin, E. Won, K. Ramaswamy, M. Triolo, M. Stiffelma et al., Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Renography for Renal Function Evaluation in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Feasibility Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.202, issue.4, pp.778-83
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.13.11321

P. Kundu, S. Lata, P. Sharma, H. Singh, A. Malhotra et al., Prospective evaluation of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with raised thyroglobulin and negative 131I-whole body scan: comparison with 18F-FDG PET-CT, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.32, issue.7, pp.1354-62, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-014-2723-9

F. Buchegger, First imaging results of an intra-individual comparison of 11C- acetate and 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer at early biochemical first or second relapse after prostatectomy or radiotherapy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013.

K. Kubiessa, Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.33, issue.Suppl 1, pp.639-687
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-013-2633-2

K. Nielsen, A. Chakera, B. Hesse, R. Scolyer, J. Stretch et al., The diagnostic value of adding dynamic scintigraphy to standard delayed planar imaging for sentinel node identification in melanoma patients, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.39, issue.11, pp.1999-2004, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-011-1880-3

M. Jardin and R. J. , Patent foramen ovale: detection with nongated multidetector CT, Radiology, vol.249, issue.1, pp.338-383, 2008.

L. Drubach, D. Zurakowski, E. Palmer, D. Tracy, and E. Lee, Utility of Salivagram in Pulmonary Aspiration in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Salivagram and Chest Radiography, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.200, issue.2
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.12.8792

J. Chung, B. Little, A. Forssen, J. Yong, A. Nambu et al., Proton MRI in the evaluation of pulmonary sarcoidosis: Comparison to chest CT, European Journal of Radiology, vol.82, issue.12, pp.2378-85, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.019

L. Wang, C. Yan, S. Zhao, and W. Fang, Comparison of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/18F-FDG PET Imaging and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol.37, issue.12, pp.1163-1169, 2012.
DOI : 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182708794

V. Ambrosini, 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in comparison with CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with neuroendocrine tumours, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.12, issue.8, pp.722-727, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-009-1349-9

S. Zink, S. Ohki, B. Stein, D. Zambuto, R. Rosenberg et al., Tc-Labeled RBC Scintigraphy, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.191, issue.4, pp.1107-1121, 2008.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.07.3642

S. Acid, L. Corroller, T. Aswad, R. Pauly, V. Champsaur et al., Preoperative Imaging of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Diagnostic Effectiveness of MDCT Arthrography and Comparison With MR Arthrography and Arthroscopy, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.198, issue.3, pp.661-668, 2012.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.11.7251

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01453427

Y. Duan, X. Wang, X. Yang, D. Wu, Z. Cheng et al., Diagnostic Efficiency of Low-Dose CT Angiography Compared With Conventional Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Occlusions, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.201, issue.6
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.12.10209

R. Wanga, Low dose prospective ECG-gated delayed enhanced dual-source computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance, European Journal of Radiology, vol.80, issue.2, pp.326-330, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.007

P. Vivier, A. Sallem, M. Beurdeley, R. Lim, J. Leroux et al., MRI and suspected acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, European Radiology, vol.259, issue.1, pp.19-25, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-013-2971-2

J. L. Fleiss, Inference About Weighted Kappa in the Non-Null Case, Applied Psychological Measurement, vol.2, issue.1, pp.113-117, 1978.
DOI : 10.1177/014662167800200111

T. Femoral, Torsion measurements With 3D Models based on Low-Dose Biplanar radiographs in Comparison With standard CT Measurements, AJR, vol.199, pp.607-612, 2012.

E. Mohamed, A. Abou-el-ghar, H. El-assmy, and . Refaie, Tarek El-Diasty. Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Gross Hematuria, Radiology, vol.251, 2009.

L. Saba and G. Mallarini, A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids, European Journal of Radiology, vol.76, issue.1, pp.42-47, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.064

D. Fuster, O. Solà, A. Soriano, A. Monegal, X. Setoain et al., A Prospective Study Comparing Whole-Body FDG PET/CT to Combined Planar Bone Scan With 67Ga SPECT/CT in the Diagnosis of Spondylodiskitis, Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol.37, issue.9, pp.827-859, 2012.
DOI : 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318262ae6c

K. Michielsen, Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT, European Radiology, vol.126, issue.Suppl 1, pp.889-901
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-013-3083-8

J. Buhk, K. Kallenberg, A. Mohr, P. Dechent, and M. Knauth, Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms???a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA, European Radiology, vol.50, issue.2, pp.430-436, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-008-1171-y

B. Rodríguez and . Vigil, Prospective Study of Enhanced Full-Dose PET/CT Versus Unenhanced Low-Dose PET/CT», J Nucl Med, vol.47, pp.1643-1648, 2006.

S. Balogova, Whole-Body 18F-Fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT and MRI of the Spine for Monitoring Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Metastatic to Bone, Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol.39, issue.11, pp.951-959, 2014.
DOI : 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000562