Les cancers en France en 2014. Institut national du Cancer, 2014. ,
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.353, issue.17, pp.1773-1783, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa052911
A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis, Clinical Radiology, vol.67, issue.10, pp.976-981, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009
Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations, Radiology, vol.225, issue.1, pp.165-175, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2251011667
Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging., Radiology, vol.205, issue.2, pp.399-406, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620
Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography, Academic Radiology, vol.7, issue.12, pp.1085-1097, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80061-6
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings, European Radiology, vol.130, issue.12, pp.2817-2825, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Environment: A Subjective Side-by-Side Review, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.195, issue.2, pp.172-176, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.09.3244
In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.32, issue.12, p.5618, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.3488899
Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography, Acta Radiologica, vol.51, issue.3, pp.240-247, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.3109/02841850903524447
Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography, Acta Radiologica, vol.52, issue.2, pp.134-142, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1258/ar.2010.100262
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting, Acta Radiologica, vol.53, issue.5, pp.524-529, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1258/ar.2012.120062
Assessment of extent of breast cancer: Comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography, Clinical Radiology, vol.68, issue.12, pp.1254-1259, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.006
Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Compared with Digital Mammography Alone: Results of a Multicenter, Multireader Trial, Radiology, vol.266, issue.1, pp.104-113, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12120674
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens, Acta Radiologica, vol.55, issue.6, pp.661-667, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0284185113503636
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Supplemental Diagnostic Mammographic Views for Evaluation of Noncalcified Breast Lesions, Radiology, vol.266, issue.1, pp.89-95, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12120552
One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis, European Radiology, vol.20, issue.3, pp.539-544, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-011-2305-1
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Comparable to Mammographic Spot Views for Mass Characterization, Radiology, vol.262, issue.1, pp.61-68, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11101763
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Initial Experience in 98 Women with Abnormal Digital Screening Mammography, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.189, issue.3, pp.616-623, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.07.2231
Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: A preliminary study, Medical Physics, vol.5745, issue.4, p.1486, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.601622
Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results, European Radiology, vol.14, issue.12, pp.16-24, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-009-1523-2
Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.196, issue.2, pp.320-324, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.10.4656
Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, The Breast Journal, vol.35, issue.6, pp.638-644, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01152.x
Two-View and Single-View Tomosynthesis versus Full-Field Digital Mammography: High-Resolution X-Ray Imaging Observer Study, Radiology, vol.262, issue.3, pp.788-796, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11103514
Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study, European Radiology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.9-14, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-014-3402-8
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.193, issue.2, pp.586-591, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.08.2031
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study, European Radiology, vol.36, issue.7, pp.1545-1553, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.85, issue.1019, pp.1074-1082, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1259/bjr/53282892
Implementation of Breast Tomosynthesis in a Routine Screening Practice: An Observational Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.200, issue.6, pp.1401-1408, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.12.9672
Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening, Radiology, vol.269, issue.3, pp.694-700, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130307
Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program, Radiology, vol.267, issue.1, pp.47-56, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12121373
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study, The Lancet Oncology, vol.14, issue.7, pp.583-589, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7
Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malm?? Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study, European Radiology, vol.98, issue.1, pp.330-345, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3
Funding, Health Technology Assessment, vol.19, issue.4, pp.1-136, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.3310/hta19040
Time to Diagnosis and Performance Levels during Repeat Interpretations of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Academic Radiology, vol.17, issue.4, pp.450-455, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.011
Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.85, issue.1020, pp.1174-1178, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1259/bjr/19385909
Addition of Tomosynthesis to Conventional Digital Mammography: Effect on Image Interpretation Time of Screening Examinations, Radiology, vol.270, issue.1, pp.49-56, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130765
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical Practice, Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol.10, issue.12, pp.913-917, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.010
Comparison of Two-dimensional Synthesized Mammograms versus Original Digital Mammograms Alone and in Combination with Tomosynthesis Images, Radiology, vol.271, issue.3, pp.664-671, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13131530
BI-RADS Update, Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol.52, issue.3, pp.481-487, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.02.008
Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach, Biometrics, vol.44, issue.3, p.837, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2531595
Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography, JAMA, vol.311, issue.24, p.2499, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2014.6095
Diagnostic Accuracy and Recall Rates for Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Combined With One-View and Two-View Tomosynthesis: Results of an Enriched Reader Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.202, issue.2, pp.273-281, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.13.11240
Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Screening using Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images, Academic Radiology, vol.19, issue.2, pp.166-171, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.003
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial), Radiology, vol.277, issue.3, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2015142566
Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis. RöFo -Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Bildgeb Verfahr, pp.911-918, 2012. ,
A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process, Medical Physics, vol.139, issue.1, p.14301, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncq103
Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection, The Breast, vol.22, issue.2, pp.101-108, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017
Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Conventional Diagnostic Mammography Views for Screening Recalls Without Calcifications? A Comparison Study in a Simulated Clinical Setting, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.200, issue.2, pp.291-298, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.12.8881