The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: A large population-based study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.166, issue.3 ,
DOI : 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91347-D
The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.77, issue.4, pp.410-415, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.770409.x
Accouchement en présentation du siège, EMC Obstétrique ,
Précis d'obstétrique 1974 4 e édition Paris ,
Mode d'accouchement en cas de pr??sentation du si??ge ?? terme??: la tentative de voie basse est-elle une option raisonnable???, EMC - Obst??trique, vol.3, issue.2, pp.1-9, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0246-0335(08)49485-1
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial, Lancet, vol.356, p.1375, 2000. ,
Mode d???accouchement des femmes avec une pr??sentation du si??ge ?? terme dans l?????tude PREMODA (PREsentation et MODe d???accouchement), Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.33, issue.1, pp.37-44, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96663-X
Is cesarean section indicated for breach presentation?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.29, pp.30-39, 2000. ,
The Risks of Planned Vaginal Breech Delivery Versus Planned Caesarean Section for Term Breech Birth, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, vol.36, issue.4, pp.49-54, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.aoa.0000504747.17851.8d
La version par man??uvre externe??: audit sur un an dans une maternit?? de niveau??3, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.39, issue.6, pp.346-350, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.02.001
La version par man??uvres externes a-t-elle vraiment un int??r??t???, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.36, issue.4, pp.472-476, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.02.003
Présentation par le siège à terme. Version par manoeuvres externes : quand et comment ?, EMC Obstétrique, vol.5, issue.2, pp.49-91, 2002. ,
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.14, p.83, 2015. ,
Mode of Delivery Following Successful External Cephalic Version: Comparison With Spontaneous Cephalic Presentations at Delivery, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol.35, issue.10, pp.883-891, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30809-4
Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery After Successful External Cephalic Version, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.104, issue.1, pp.155-60, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129240.54949.d2
Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.198, issue.(4), pp.221-225, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00274-6
Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis, Journal of Perinatology, vol.56, issue.2, pp.96-100, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00149-3
LABOR AND DELIVERY FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION, American Journal of Perinatology, vol.17, issue.Number 04, pp.183-189, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1055/s-2000-9421
Mode of Delivery After Successful External Cephalic Version, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.123, issue.6, pp.1327-1361, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000295
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med, vol.16351, pp.2581-2590, 2004. ,
Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: A prospective study, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.66, issue.1, pp.13-19, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.3109/01443610903383341
Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.176, issue.1, pp.218-241, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80040-3
Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.190, issue.3, pp.763-771, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.056
Risk factors for cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.10, issue.12, pp.1-3, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.02.005
Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery ,
Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.118, issue.2, pp.313-322, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-015-3643-z
Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version, Journal of Perinatology, vol.108, issue.6, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00313.x
Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version, Obstet Gynecol, vol.83, pp.771-774, 1994. ,
Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.18, issue.(1), pp.272-276, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.03.029
Successful External Cephalic Version: Factors Predicting Vaginal Birth, The Scientific World Journal, vol.860107, 2014. ,
Complications f??tales et n??onatales des grossesses prolong??es, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.40, issue.8, pp.717-742, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.09.007
Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol.34, issue.3, pp.212-217, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1515/JPM.2006.037
Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: is X-ray pelvimetry necessary?, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.76, issue.5, pp.421-425, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15265.x
Standards for midwife practitioners of external cephalic version: A Delphi study, Midwifery, vol.31, issue.5, pp.79-86, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.004
Les m??thodes alternatives ?? la version par man??uvre externe en cas de pr??sentation du si??ge, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.33, issue.2, pp.94-98, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96407-1
Facteurs de r??ussite d???une version par man??uvre externe??: ??tude r??trospective de 439 cas, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.5, pp.493-498, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.11.032
Predictors of success of external cephalic version: Bi-center study, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.1248, p.7, 2015. ,
Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: The predictive factors affecting outcome, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.174, issue.3, pp.224-232, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.3109/01443615.2010.544426
Prognostic index for vaginal delivery in breech presentation at term, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.98, issue.6, pp.854-861, 1967. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90204-9
A six-year prospective study of term breech deliveries utilizing the Zatuchni-Andros Prognostic Scoring Index, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.121, issue.4, pp.551-559, 1975. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90091-5
Le pronostic foetal en présentation du siège ,
Traité du palper abdominal au point de vue obstétrical et de la version par manoeuvres externes. Deuxième édition, p.1889 ,