H. Kaplan, J. Malmgren, M. Atwood, and G. Calip, Effect of treatment and mammography detection on breast cancer survival over time: 1990-2007, Cancer, vol.48, issue.7 suppl, pp.2553-61, 2015.
DOI : 10.1002/cncr.29371

L. Dossus, M. Boutron-ruault, R. Kaaks, I. Gram, A. Vilier et al., Active and passive cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort, International Journal of Cancer, vol.174, issue.10 Part 1, pp.1871-88, 2014.
DOI : 10.1002/ijc.28508

I. Romieu, C. Scoccianti, V. Chajès, J. De-batlle, C. Biessy et al., Alcohol intake and breast cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition, International Journal of Cancer, vol.26, issue.36 Suppl 1
DOI : 10.1002/ijc.29469

. Overweight and . Obesity, Invasive Breast Cancer Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials, JAMA Oncol, p.2015

J. Collins, J. Blake, and P. Crosignani, Breast cancer risk with postmenopausal hormonal treatment, Human Reproduction Update, vol.11, issue.6, pp.545-60, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmi028

M. Barton, R. Harris, and S. Fletcher, The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA, pp.1270-80, 1999.

N. Oestreicher, C. Lehman, D. Seger, D. Buist, and E. White, The Incremental Contribution of Clinical Breast Examination to Invasive Cancer Detection in a Mammography Screening Program, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.184, issue.2, pp.428-460, 2005.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840428

L. Provencher, J. Hogue, C. Desbiens, B. Poirier, E. Poirier et al., Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection? Curr Oncol, 2016.
DOI : 10.3747/co.23.2881

P. Gøtzsche and K. Jørgensen, Screening for breast cancer with mammography

S. Duffy, R. Gabe, L. Tabar, A. Yen, and T. Chen, The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am, CD001877. 16. Smith RA, 2004.

L. Tabár, B. Vitak, T. Chen, A. Yen, A. Cohen et al., Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 Decades, Radiology, vol.260, issue.3, pp.658-63, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11110469

L. Humphrey, M. Helfand, B. Chan, and S. Woolf, Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.137, issue.5_Part_1, 2002.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012

. Inca, G. Reeves, V. Beral, D. Bull, B. Crossley et al., Available from: http://www.e ? cancer.fr/rss ?depistage/8921 ?depistage? organise? du ?cancer ?du ? sein? publication? dun ? rapport ?de ?synthese? denquete? sur ?la?performance ?de ?la? mammographie 20. INCa Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study, BMJ, vol.329, issue.7464, p.477, 2004.

W. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. Nessaiver, W. Carter, M. Bhargavan et al., Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer, Radiology, vol.233, issue.3, pp.830-879, 2004.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2333031484

M. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. Porter, D. White, C. Finder et al., Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.92, issue.13, pp.1081-1088, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081

W. Berg, J. Blume, J. Cormack, E. Mendelson, D. Lehrer et al., Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer, JAMA, vol.299, issue.18, pp.2151-63, 2008.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151

T. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J. Newhouse, Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations, Radiology, vol.225, issue.1, pp.165-75, 2002.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2251011667

N. Ohuchi, A. Suzuki, T. Sobue, M. Kawai, S. Yamamoto et al., Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.387, issue.10016, pp.341-349, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6

P. Crystal, S. Strano, S. Shcharynski, and M. Koretz, Using Sonography to Screen Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.181, issue.1, pp.177-82, 2003.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810177

E. Chae, H. Kim, J. Cha, H. Shin, and H. Kim, Evaluation of Screening Whole-Breast Sonography as a Supplemental Tool in Conjunction With Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol.45, issue.9, pp.1573-1581, 2013.
DOI : 10.7863/ultra.32.9.1573

J. Scheel, J. Lee, B. Sprague, C. Lee, and C. Lehman, Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.212, issue.1, pp.9-17
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.048

M. Kriege, C. Brekelmans, C. Boetes, P. Besnard, H. Zonderland et al., Efficacy of MRI and Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.351, issue.5, pp.427-464, 2004.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa031759

. Available, e-cancer.fr/Expertises-et-publications/Catalogue-des- publications/Indication-de-la-tomosynthese-dans-une-strategie-de-detection-precoce-des- cancers-du-sein 35

D. Bernardi, P. Macaskill, M. Pellegrini, M. Valentini, C. Fantò et al., Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study, The Lancet Oncology, vol.17, issue.8, pp.1105-1118, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2

A. Lourenco, M. Barry-brooks, G. Baird, A. Tuttle, and M. Mainiero, Changes in Recall Type and Patient Treatment Following Implementation of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Radiology, vol.274, issue.2, pp.337-379, 2015.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.14140317

J. Greenberg, M. Javitt, J. Katzen, S. Michael, and A. Holland, Clinical Performance Metrics of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With 2D Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Community Practice, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.203, issue.3, pp.687-93, 2014.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.14.12642

S. Zuckerman, E. Conant, B. Keller, A. Maidment, B. Barufaldi et al., Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program. Radiology, 2016.

P. Skaane, A. Bandos, R. Gullien, E. Eben, U. Ekseth et al., Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program, Radiology, vol.267, issue.1, pp.47-56
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12121373

P. Skaane, A. Bandos, R. Gullien, E. Eben, U. Ekseth et al., Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration, European Radiology, vol.17, issue.Suppl 1, pp.2061-71, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3

J. Lei, P. Yang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, and K. Yang, Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis, European Radiology, vol.196, issue.3, pp.595-602, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x

S. Destounis, R. Morgan, and A. Arieno, Screening for Dense Breasts: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, NHS. Technical evaluation of Hologic Selenia Dimensions digital breast tomosynthesis system -NHCBSP Equipment Report 1307 version 2, pp.261-265, 2014.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.14.13554

P. Skaane, A. Bandos, E. Eben, I. Jebsen, M. Krager et al., Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images, Radiology, vol.271, issue.3, pp.655-63, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13131391

P. Skaane, A. Bandos, R. Gullien, E. Eben, U. Ekseth et al., Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration, European Radiology, vol.17, issue.Suppl 1, pp.2061-71, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3

P. Dang, P. Freer, K. Humphrey, E. Halpern, and E. Rafferty, Addition of Tomosynthesis to Conventional Digital Mammography: Effect on Image Interpretation Time of Screening Examinations, Radiology, vol.270, issue.1, pp.49-56, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130765

W. Bruening, J. Fontanarosa, K. Tipton, J. Treadwell, J. Launders et al., Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy to Diagnose Breast Lesions, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.152, issue.4, pp.238-284, 2010.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00190

B. Fornage, Percutaneous biopsies of the breast: State of the art, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, vol.170, issue.1, pp.29-39, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02635528

E. De-paredes, T. Langer, and J. Cousins, Interventional breast procedures, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, vol.27, issue.5, pp.133-84, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0363-0188(98)90010-X

J. Klijanienko and P. Vielh, [Fine-needle biopsy under echographic control in nonpalpable breast lesions. Technical aspects], Arch Anat Cytol Pathol, vol.46, issue.4, pp.233-238, 1998.

B. Fornage, M. Faroux, and A. Simatos, Breast masses: US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy., Radiology, vol.162, issue.2, pp.409-423, 1987.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3541029

D. Lieu, Value of cytopathologist-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration as a screening test for ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in nonpalpable breast masses, Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol.35, issue.4
DOI : 10.1002/dc.20984

T. Oyama, Y. Koibuchi, and G. Mckee, Core needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic method for breast lesions: Comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA), Breast Cancer, vol.54, issue.4, pp.339-381, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02968040

E. Pisano, L. Fajardo, J. Tsimikas, N. Sneige, W. Frable et al., Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer Cancers du sein -Recommandations et outils d'aide à la pratique Available from: http://www.ecancer.fr/Professionnels-de-sante/Recommandations-et-outils-d-aide-a-la-pratique/Cancers- du-sein 58 Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles, Feb Institut National Du Cancer [Internet]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol.1582171, issue.41, pp.679-88, 1998.

M. Mainiero, I. Gareen, C. Bird, W. Smith, C. Cobb et al., Preferential Use of Sonographically Guided Biopsy to Minimize Patient Discomfort and Procedure Time in a Percutaneous Image-Guided Breast Biopsy Program, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol.21, issue.11, 2002.
DOI : 10.7863/jum.2002.21.11.1221

S. Parker, W. Jobe, M. Dennis, A. Stavros, K. Johnson et al., US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy., Radiology, vol.187, issue.2, pp.507-518, 1993.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475299

M. Newell and M. Mahoney, Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Breast Biopsy, Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol.17, issue.1, pp.23-31, 2014.
DOI : 10.1053/j.tvir.2013.12.005

. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up, Radiology, 1999.

A. Koskela, M. Sudah, M. Berg, V. Kärjä, P. Mustonen et al., Add-on Device for Stereotactic Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: How Many Biopsy Specimens Are Needed for a Reliable Diagnosis?, Radiology, vol.236, issue.3, pp.801-810, 2005.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2363040782

C. Perlet, S. Heywang-kobrunner, A. Heinig, H. Sittek, J. Casselman et al., Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, Cancer, vol.178, issue.5, pp.982-90, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/cncr.21720

C. Spick, M. Schernthaner, K. Pinker, P. Kapetas, M. Bernathova et al., MRguided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience MRIguided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques, Eur Radiol Eur Radiol, vol.6724, issue.1, pp.128-163, 2014.

C. Verheyden, E. Pages-bouic, C. Balleyguier, P. Cherel, D. Lepori et al., Underestimation Rate at MR Imaging-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: A Multi- Institutional Retrospective Study of 1509 Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy, Breast Biopsies. Radiology. Radiology, 2015.

J. Viala, P. Gignier, B. Perret, C. Hovasse, D. Hovasse et al., Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3D-tomosynthesis system CNRS Innovation -Liste d'actualités [Internet] Available from: http://www.cnrs.fr/lettre-innovation/actus.php?numero=123 73 Available from: https, CSET 2112 [Internet]. Gustave Roussy | 1er centre de lutte contre le cancer en Europe, pp.4-9, 2016.
DOI : 10.1111/tbj.12044

S. Lakhani, I. Ellis, and S. Schnitt, WHO Classification of tumours of the breast, 2012.

S. Wellings, H. Jensen, and R. Marcum, e-cancer.fr/Patients-et-proches/Les-cancers/Cancer-du- sein/Anatomie-du-sein 76 An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions, J Natl Cancer Inst, 1975.

F. Squartinl and R. Sarnell, Structure, functional changes, and proliferative pathology of the human mammary lobule in cancerous breasts, J Natl Cancer Inst, vol.67, issue.1, pp.33-46, 1981.

K. Siziopikou, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Current Concepts and Future Directions, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol.137, issue.4, pp.462-468
DOI : 10.5858/arpa.2012-0078-RA

G. Sakorafas and D. Farley, Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, Surgical Oncology, vol.12, issue.4, pp.221-261, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0960-7404(03)00031-8

B. Virnig, T. Tuttle, T. Shamliyan, and R. Kane, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.102, issue.3, pp.170-178, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djp482

D. Page, T. Kidd, W. Dupont, J. Simpson, and L. Rogers, Lobular neoplasia of the breast: Higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease, Human Pathology, vol.22, issue.12, pp.1232-1241, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90105-X

L. Sen, W. Berg, R. Hooley, G. Carter, M. Desouki et al., Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.207, issue.5, pp.1-14, 2016.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.15.15425

F. Nakhlis, L. Gilmore, R. Gelman, I. Bedrosian, K. Ludwig et al., Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Invasive Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In-situ in Patients with Lobular Neoplasia on Core Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry (TBCRC 020), Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol.269, issue.491???6, pp.722-730, 2016.
DOI : 10.1245/s10434-015-4922-4

A. Maxwell, K. Clements, D. Dodwell, A. Evans, A. Francis et al., The radiological features, diagnosis and management of screen-detected lobular neoplasia of the breast: Findings from the Sloane Project, The Breast, vol.27, pp.2016109-2016124
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2016.03.004

C. Forgeard, M. Benchaib, N. Guerin, P. Thiesse, H. Mignotte et al., Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? a retrospective study of 300 patients, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.196, issue.3, pp.339-384, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.038

B. Mesurolle, J. Perez, F. Azzumea, E. Lemercier, X. Xie et al., Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed at Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Frequency, Final Surgical Outcome, and Factors Associated With Underestimation, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.202, issue.6, 2014.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.13.10864

I. Youn, M. Kim, H. Moon, and E. Kim, Absence of Residual Microcalcifications in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed via Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Obviated?, Journal of Breast Cancer, vol.17, issue.3, pp.265-274, 2014.
DOI : 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.3.265

V. Londero, C. Zuiani, A. Linda, L. Battigelli, G. Brondani et al., Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device, European Radiology, vol.6, issue.6, pp.1200-1206, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-010-2053-7

T. Menes, K. Kerlikowske, J. Lange, S. Jaffer, R. Rosenberg et al., Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk Following Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia on Needle Biopsy Analysis of Clinical and Pathologic Factors of Pure, Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Needle Biopsy to Aid in the Decision of Excision or Observation, JAMA Oncol J Cancer, vol.907, issue.1, pp.1-6, 2016.

V. Prowler, J. Joh, G. Acs, J. Kiluk, C. Laronga et al., Surgical excision of pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle breast biopsy, The Breast, vol.23, issue.4, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.013

L. Kunju and C. Kleer, Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: should it be excised?, Human Pathology, vol.38, issue.1, pp.35-41, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.008

M. Sudarshan, A. Meguerditchian, B. Mesurolle, and S. Meterissian, Flat epithelial atypia of the breast: characteristics and behaviors, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.201, issue.2, pp.245-50, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.009

J. Berry, A. Trappey, T. Vreeland, A. Pattyn, G. Clifton et al., Analysis of Clinical and Pathologic Factors of Pure, Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Needle Biopsy to Aid in the Decision of Excision or Observation, Journal of Cancer, vol.7, issue.1, pp.1-6, 2016.
DOI : 10.7150/jca.12781

E. Kim, A. Hankins, J. Cassity, D. Mcdonald, B. White et al., Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary? Springerplus Radial Scar at Percutaneous Breast Biopsy That Does Not Require Surgery Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management, J Am Coll Surg Breast, vol.5, issue.97, pp.398-96, 2016.

Z. Li, A. Ranade, and C. Zhao, Pathologic findings of follow-up surgical excision for radial scar on breast core needle biopsy, Human Pathology, vol.48, pp.76-80, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.06.028

C. Moffat, S. Pinder, A. Dixon, C. Elston, R. Blamey et al., Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a clinicopathological review of thirty-two cases, Histopathology, vol.4, issue.3, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90268-8

E. Tan, P. Tan, T. Hoon, W. Yong, H. Wong et al., RECURRENT PHYLLODES TUMOURS OF THE BREAST: PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS, ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol.58, issue.6, 2006.
DOI : 10.1001/archsurg.134.5.487

Y. Ni and G. Tse, Pathological criteria and practical issues in papillary lesions of the breast - a review, Histopathology, vol.8, issue.1, pp.22-32, 2016.
DOI : 10.1111/his.12866

C. Elston and I. Ellis, pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, vol.9, issue.5
DOI : 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90171-X

C. W. Elston and &. O. Ellis, pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, vol.9, issue.5, pp.403-410, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90171-X

A. Lebeau, M. Kriegsmann, E. Burandt, and H. Sinn, Invasive breast cancer: the current ! 107 WHO classification]. Pathologe, Feb, vol.35, issue.1, pp.7-17, 2014.

C. Li, B. Anderson, P. Porter, S. Holt, J. Daling et al., Changing incidence rate of invasive lobular breast carcinoma among older women, Cancer, vol.50, issue.11, pp.2561-2570, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2561::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-X

G. Arpino, V. Bardou, G. Clark, and R. Elledge, Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome, Breast Cancer Research, vol.8, issue.3, pp.149-56, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(197507)36:1<1::AID-CNCR2820360102>3.0.CO;2-4

R. Barroso-sousa and O. Metzger-filho, Differences between invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: results and therapeutic implications, Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, vol.8, issue.4, pp.261-267
DOI : 10.1177/1758834016644156

D. Youlden, S. Cramb, N. Dunn, J. Muller, C. Pyke et al., The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: An international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality, Cancer Epidemiology, vol.36, issue.3, pp.237-285
DOI : 10.1016/j.canep.2012.02.007

R. White, T. Halperin, J. Olson, M. Soo, R. Bentley et al., Impact of Core-Needle Breast Biopsy on the Surgical Management of Mammographic Abnormalities, Annals of Surgery, vol.233, issue.6, pp.769-77, 2001.
DOI : 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00006

G. Pfarl, T. Helbich, C. Riedl, T. Wagner, M. Gnant et al., Stereotactic 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Validation Study, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.179, issue.6, 2002.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791503

R. Jackman, F. Marzoni, and J. Rosenberg, False-Negative Diagnoses at Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Needle Breast Biopsy: Long-Term Follow-Up of 1,280 Lesions and Review of the Literature, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.192, issue.2, pp.341-51, 2009.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.08.1127

M. Mahoney and M. Newell, Breast intervention: how I do it. Radiology, 2013.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13120985

L. Liberman, Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.174, issue.5, pp.1191-1200, 2000.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741191

L. Niklason, B. Christian, L. Niklason, D. Kopans, D. Castleberry et al., Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging., Radiology, vol.205, issue.2, pp.399-406, 1997.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620

N. Houssami and P. Skaane, Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection, The Breast, vol.22, issue.2, pp.101-109
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017

B. Haas, V. Kalra, J. Geisel, M. Raghu, M. Durand et al., Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening, Radiology, vol.269, issue.3, pp.694-700, 2013.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130307

E. Mcdonald, A. Oustimov, S. Weinstein, M. Synnestvedt, M. Schnall et al., Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography, JAMA Oncology, vol.2, issue.6, 2016.
DOI : 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536

T. Bian, Q. Lin, C. Cui, L. Li, C. Qi et al., Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts, The Breast Journal, vol.193, issue.5, 2016.
DOI : 10.1111/tbj.12622

M. Wallis, A. Tardivon, A. Tarvidon, T. Helbich, and I. Schreer, Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures, European Radiology, vol.174, issue.3, pp.581-589, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-006-0408-x

I. Thomassin-naggara, N. Perrot, S. Dechoux, C. Ribeiro, J. Chopier et al., Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience, European Journal of Radiology, vol.84, issue.2, pp.235-276, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.022

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01087639

M. Bahl, J. Baker, E. Kinsey, and S. Ghate, Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.205, issue.6, pp.1339-1384, 2015.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.15.14628

M. Durand, S. Wang, R. Hooley, M. Raghu, and L. Philpotts, Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation, RadioGraphics, vol.36, issue.2, pp.311-332
DOI : 10.1148/rg.2016150093

L. Partyka, A. Lourenco, and M. Mainiero, Detection of Mammographically Occult Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: Initial Clinical Experience, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.203, issue.1
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.13.11047

P. Freer, B. Niell, and E. Rafferty, Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions, Radiology, vol.275, issue.2, pp.377-83, 2015.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.14140515

R. Roth, A. Maidment, S. Weinstein, S. Roth, and E. Conant, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Lessons Learned from Early Clinical Implementation, RadioGraphics, vol.34, issue.4, p.2014
DOI : 10.1148/rg.344130087

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319526

A. Tagliafico, G. Mariscotti, M. Durando, C. Stevanin, G. Tagliafico et al., Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study, European Radiology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.9-14
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-014-3402-8

I. Thomassin-naggara, I. Trop, J. Chopier, J. David, L. Lalonde et al., Nonmasslike Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: The Added Value of Mammography and US for Lesion Categorization, Radiology, vol.261, issue.1, pp.69-79, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11110190

G. Mariscotti, N. Houssami, M. Durando, P. Campanino, E. Regini et al., Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Characterize MRI-Detected Additional Lesions Unidentified at Targeted Ultrasound in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients, European Radiology, vol.34, issue.Suppl 2, pp.2673-81, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-015-3669-4

P. Clauser, L. Carbonaro, M. Pancot, R. Girometti, M. Bazzocchi et al., Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis, European Radiology, vol.19, issue.10, pp.2830-2839, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-015-3720-5

A. Mateo and A. Frankel, Is 6-Month Radiologic Imaging Necessary after Benign Breast Biopsy? Review of Literature and Multicenter Experience, Am Surg, p.2015

C. Lee, L. Philpotts, L. Horvath, and I. Tocino, Follow-up of Breast Lesions Diagnosed as Benign with Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy: Frequency of Mammographic Change and False-Negative Rate, Radiology, vol.212, issue.1, pp.189-94, 1999.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl42189

P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. Helbich, Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.178, issue.5, pp.1221-1226, 2002.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781221