J. Belaisch-allart, V. Maget, J. Mayenga, I. Grefenstette, A. Chouraqui et al., Prendre en charge les femmes de 40 ans et plus en FIV : pour ou contre ou pour et contre ? Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil, pp.599-603, 2015.

Y. Hashiloni-dolev, A. Kaplan, and S. Shkedi-rafid, The fertility myth: Israeli students' knowledge regarding age-related fertility decline and late pregnancies in an era of assisted reproduction technology, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.11, pp.3045-53, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der304

H. Volgsten, S. Svanberg, A. Ekselius, L. Lundkvist, and O. , Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment, Human Reproduction, vol.23, issue.9, pp.2056-63, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/den154

T. Chen, S. Chang, C. Tsai, and K. Juang, Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic, Human Reproduction, vol.19, issue.10, pp.2313-2321, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deh414

J. Beaurepaire, M. Jones, P. Thiering, D. Saunders, and C. Tennant, Psychosocial adjustment to infertility and its treatment: Male and female responses at different stages of IVF/ET treatment, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol.38, issue.3, pp.229-269, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90118-X

R. Lund, C. Sejbaek, U. Christensen, and L. Schmidt, The impact of social relations on the incidence of severe depressive symptoms among infertile women and men, Human Reproduction, vol.24, issue.11, pp.2810-2830, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dep257

F. Chiaffarino, M. Baldini, C. Scarduelli, F. Bommarito, A. S. et al., Prevalence and incidence of depressive and anxious symptoms in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment in an Italian infertility department, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.158, issue.2, pp.235-276, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.032

F. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D. Hendriks, B. Mol, and C. Lambalk, A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome, Human Reproduction Update, vol.12, issue.6, pp.685-718, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dml034

K. Hansen, N. Knowlton, A. Thyer, J. Charleston, M. Soules et al., A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause, Human Reproduction, vol.23, issue.3, pp.699-708, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dem408

C. Tietze, Reproductive Span and Rate of Reproduction Among Hutterite Women, Fertility and Sterility, vol.8, issue.1, pp.89-97, 1957.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)32587-0

J. Menken, J. Trussell, and U. Larsen, Age and infertility, Science. 26 sept, vol.233, issue.4771, pp.1389-94, 1986.

S. Spandorfer, O. Avrech, L. Colombero, G. Palermo, and Z. Rosenwaks, Effect of parental age on fertilization and pregnancy characteristics in couples treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Human Reproduction, vol.13, issue.2, pp.334-342, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/13.2.334

H. Leridon, Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment, Human Reproduction, vol.19, issue.7, pp.1548-53, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deh304

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00086400

D. Nikolaou and A. Templeton, Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis: Detection and clinical relevance, Human Reproduction, vol.18, issue.6, pp.1137-1146, 2003.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deg245

N. Klein, A. Harper, B. Houmard, P. Sluss, and M. Soules, Is the Short Follicular Phase in Older Women Secondary to Advanced or Accelerated Dominant Follicle Development?, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol.87, issue.12, pp.5746-50, 2002.
DOI : 10.1210/jc.2002-020622

M. Rosen, E. Johnstone, C. Mcculloch, S. Schuh-huerta, B. Sternfeld et al., A characterization of the relationship of ovarian reserve markers with age, Fertility and Sterility, vol.97, issue.1, pp.238-281, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.031

J. Pouly, L. Ouziel, A. Gremeau, J. De-mouzon, L. Janny et al., Analyse des facteurs influen??ant les taux cumulatifs d???accouchement en AMP sur une cohorte de 1001??couples, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.40, issue.4, pp.219-244, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.01.005

I. González-foruria, J. Peñarrubia, A. Borràs, D. Manau, G. Casals et al., Age, independent from ovarian reserve status, is the main prognostic factor in natural cycle in vitro fertilization, Fertility and Sterility, vol.106, issue.2
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.007

J. Remohí, B. Gartner, E. Gallardo, S. Yalil, C. Simón et al., Pregnancy and birth rates after oocyte donation, Fertility and Sterility, vol.67, issue.4, pp.717-740, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81372-6

M. Sauer, R. Paulson, and R. Lobo, Reversing the Natural Decline in Human Fertility, JAMA, vol.268, issue.10, pp.1275-1284, 1992.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1992.03490100073030

D. Braga, A. Setti, S. De-cássia, R. Figueira, R. Machado et al., Influence of oocyte dysmorphisms on blastocyst formation and quality, Fertility and Sterility, vol.100, issue.3, pp.748-54, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.021

J. Franasiak, E. Forman, K. Hong, M. Werner, K. Upham et al., The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening, Fertility and Sterility, vol.101, issue.3, pp.656-663, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004

S. Munné, K. Held, C. Magli, B. Ata, D. Wells et al., Intra-age, intercenter, and intercycle differences in chromosome abnormalities in oocytes, Fertility and Sterility, vol.97, issue.4, pp.935-977, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.106

P. Xia, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality, Human Reproduction, vol.12, issue.8, pp.1750-1755, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1750

L. Schieve, L. Tatham, H. Peterson, J. Toner, and G. Jeng, Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States, Obstet Gynecol. mai, vol.101, issue.5, pp.959-67, 2003.

J. Wang, R. Norman, and A. Wilcox, Incidence of spontaneous abortion among pregnancies produced by assisted reproductive technology, Human Reproduction, vol.19, issue.2, pp.272-279, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deh078

S. Sunkara, Y. Khalaf, A. Maheshwari, P. Seed, and A. Coomarasamy, Association between response to ovarian stimulation and miscarriage following IVF: an analysis of 124 351 IVF pregnancies, Human Reproduction, vol.29, issue.6, pp.1218-1242, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deu053

D. Griffin, The Incidence, Origin, and Etiology of Aneuploidy, Int Rev Cytol, vol.167, pp.263-96, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61349-2

T. Rousseau, C. Ferdynus, C. Thauvin-robinet, J. Gouyon, and P. Sagot, Impact des variations de distribution de l?????ge maternel sur la pr??valence attendue ?? la naissance de la trisomie 21??en France m??tropolitaine entre 1965??et 2008, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.39, issue.4, pp.284-293, 1965.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.03.001

J. Van-der-steeg, P. Steures, M. Eijkemans, J. Habbema, P. Hompes et al., Predictive Value and Clinical Impact of Basal Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Subfertile, Ovulatory Women, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol.92, issue.6, pp.2163-2171, 2007.
DOI : 10.1210/jc.2006-2399

M. Haadsma, H. Groen, V. Fidler, A. Bukman, E. Roeloffzen et al., The predictive value of ovarian reserve tests for spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile ovulatory women, Human Reproduction, vol.23, issue.8, pp.1800-1807, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/den234

L. Bancsi, F. Broekmans, B. Mol, J. Habbema, and E. Te-velde, Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis, Fertility and Sterility, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1091-100, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00078-5

C. Ferté-delbende, S. Catteau-jonard, P. Barrière, and D. Dewailly, L?????valuation de la r??serve ovarienne, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.39, issue.8, pp.27-33, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(10)70028-4

F. Aubriot and C. Chapron, FSH et prise en charge en f??condation in vitro??: la meilleure et la pire des choses, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.36, issue.6, pp.636-676, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.04.006

A. Gougeon, R. Ecochard, and J. Thalabard, Age-Related Changes of the Population of Human Ovarian Follicles: Increase in the Disappearance Rate of Non-Growing and Early-Growing Follicles in Aging Women, Biology of Reproduction, vol.50, issue.3, pp.653-63, 1994.
DOI : 10.1095/biolreprod50.3.653

S. Nelson, E. Telfer, and R. Anderson, The ageing ovary and uterus: new biological insights, Human Reproduction Update, vol.19, issue.1, pp.67-83, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dms043

J. Disseldorp, . Van, C. Lambalk, J. Kwee, C. Looman et al., Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts, Human Reproduction, vol.25, issue.1, pp.221-228, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dep366

F. Broekmans, D. De-ziegler, C. Howles, A. Gougeon, G. Trew et al., The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization, Fertility and Sterility, vol.94, issue.3, pp.1044-51, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.040

M. Christianson, G. Shoham, K. Tobler, Y. Zhao, C. Cordeiro et al., Measurement of antral follicle count in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: results of a worldwide web-based survey, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.8, issue.4, pp.1435-1475, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-015-0555-6

A. Hsu, M. Arny, A. Knee, C. Bell, E. Cook et al., Antral follicle count in clinical practice: analyzing clinical relevance, Fertility and Sterility, vol.95, issue.2, pp.474-483, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.023

K. Jayaprakasan, Y. Chan, R. Islam, Z. Haoula, J. Hopkisson et al., Prediction of in??vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women, Fertility and Sterility, vol.98, issue.3, pp.657-63, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.042

D. Dewailly, C. Andersen, A. Balen, F. Broekmans, N. Dilaver et al., The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women, Human Reproduction Update, vol.20, issue.3, pp.370-85, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmt062

E. Tsakos, A. Tolikas, A. Daniilidis, and B. Asimakopoulos, Predictive value of anti-m??llerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.92, issue.5, pp.1249-53, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-014-3332-3

I. Van-rooij, F. Broekmans, G. Scheffer, C. Looman, J. Habbema et al., Serum antim??llerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study, Fertility and Sterility, vol.83, issue.4, pp.979-87, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.029

T. Kelsey, R. Anderson, P. Wright, S. Nelson, and W. Wallace, Data-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserve, Molecular Human Reproduction, vol.18, issue.2, pp.79-87, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/molehr/gar059

J. Visser and A. Themmen, Anti-M??llerian hormone and folliculogenesis, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol.234, issue.1-2, pp.81-87, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mce.2004.09.008

A. Durlinger, J. Visser, and A. Themmen, Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Mullerian hormone, Reproduction, vol.124, issue.5, pp.601-610, 2002.
DOI : 10.1530/rep.0.1240601

A. Marca, S. Giulini, A. Tirelli, E. Bertucci, T. Marsella et al., Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology, Human Reproduction, vol.22, issue.3, pp.766-71, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/del421

L. Marca, A. Stabile, G. Artenisio, A. Volpe, and A. , Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle, Human Reproduction, vol.21, issue.12, pp.3103-3110, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/del291

J. Kwee, R. Schats, J. Mcdonnell, A. Themmen, F. De-jong et al., Evaluation of anti-M??llerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve, Fertility and Sterility, vol.90, issue.3, pp.737-780, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1293

I. A. Van-rooij, F. Broekmans, E. Te-velde, B. Fauser, L. Bancsi et al., Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve, Human Reproduction, vol.17, issue.12, pp.3065-71, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3065

D. Seifer, D. Maclaughlin, B. Christian, B. Feng, and R. Shelden, Early follicular serum m??llerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles, Fertility and Sterility, vol.77, issue.3, pp.468-71, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03201-0

L. Kotanidis, B. Asimakopoulos, and N. Nikolettos, Association Between AMH, Oocyte Number and Availability of Embryos for Cryopreservation in IVF, Vivo. 11 janv, pp.877-80, 2013.

R. Gomez, M. Schorsch, T. Hahn, A. Henke, I. Hoffmann et al., The influence of AMH on IVF success, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.7, issue.9, pp.667-73, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-015-3901-0

A. Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi et al., Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART), Human Reproduction Update, vol.16, issue.2, pp.113-143, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmp036

S. Broer, M. Dólleman, B. Opmeer, B. Fauser, B. Mol et al., AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis, Human Reproduction Update, vol.17, issue.1
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmq034

A. Andersen, H. Witjes, K. Gordon, B. Mannaerts, and X. Investigators, Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.12, pp.3413-3436, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der318

S. Nelson, B. Klein, and J. Arce, Comparison of antim??llerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials, Fertility and Sterility, vol.103, issue.4, pp.923-930, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.114

S. Broer, B. Mol, D. Hendriks, and F. Broekmans, The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count, Fertility and Sterility, vol.91, issue.3, pp.705-719, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013

T. Eldar-geva, A. Ben-chetrit, I. Spitz, R. Rabinowitz, E. Markowitz et al., Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome, Human Reproduction, vol.20, issue.11, pp.3178-83, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dei203

S. Nelson, R. Yates, and R. Fleming, Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy, Human Reproduction, vol.22, issue.9, pp.2414-2435, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dem204

J. Peñarrubia, F. Fábregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, G. Casals et al., Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment, Human Reproduction, vol.20, issue.4, pp.915-937, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deh718

. Anti-müllerian, Hormone Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle Are Predictive of the Implantation Potential of the Ensuing Embryo Obtained by in Vitro Fertilization, J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1 mai, vol.92, issue.5, pp.1796-802, 2007.

H. Li, V. Lee, E. Lau, W. Yeung, P. Ho et al., Role of Baseline Antral Follicle Count and Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Prediction of Cumulative Live Birth in the First In Vitro Fertilisation Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis, PLoS ONE, vol.26, issue.6, p.61095, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0061095.t005

S. Broer, J. Disseldorp, . Van, K. Broeze, M. Dolleman et al., Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach, Human Reproduction Update, vol.19, issue.1, pp.26-36, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dms041

S. Iliodromiti, T. Kelsey, O. Wu, R. Anderson, and S. Nelson, The predictive accuracy of anti-Mullerian hormone for live birth after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, Human Reproduction Update, vol.20, issue.4, pp.560-70, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmu003

R. Tal, O. Tal, B. Seifer, and D. Seifer, Antim??llerian hormone as predictor of implantation and clinical pregnancy after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Fertility and Sterility, vol.103, issue.1, pp.119-130, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.041

T. Ebner, M. Sommergruber, M. Moser, O. Shebl, E. Schreier-lechner et al., Basal level of anti-Mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles, Human Reproduction, vol.21, issue.8, pp.2022-2028, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/del127

T. Silberstein, D. Maclaughlin, I. Shai, J. Trimarchi, G. Lambert-messerlian et al., Mullerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology, Human Reproduction, vol.21, issue.1, pp.159-63, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dei270

G. Ayd?n, A. Yavuz, H. Terzi, and T. Kutlu, Assessment of the relationship of basal serum antimullerian hormone levels with oocyte quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI, Iran J Reprod Med. avr, vol.13, issue.4, pp.231-237, 2015.

F. Lamazou, F. Fuchs, M. Grynberg, V. Gallot, É. Herzog et al., Annulations en f??condation in vitro??: mauvais pronostic, mauvaises r??pondeuses, ou variabilit?? de la r??ponse ?? la stimulation??? Analyse de 142??annulations, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.1, pp.41-48, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.06.001

R. Frydman, Overview of cancellations between at the Antoine-Béclère hospital, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. nov, vol.34, issue.7 2, pp.5-10, 2004.

B. Rossin-amar, Analysis of the cancellations and temporary suspensions: the FIVNAT data, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. nov, vol.34, issue.7 2, pp.5-14, 2005.

J. Nicopoullos and H. Abdalla, Poor response cycles: when should we cancel? Comparison of outcome between egg collection, intrauterine insemination conversion, and follow-up cycles after abandonment, Fertility and Sterility, vol.95, issue.1, pp.68-71, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.030

J. Norian, E. Levens, K. Richter, E. Widra, and M. Levy, Conversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: Is it advantageous?, Fertility and Sterility, vol.94, issue.6, pp.2073-2080, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.056

L. Loendersloot, . Van, M. Wely, . Van, J. Limpens et al., Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis, Human Reproduction Update, vol.16, issue.6, pp.577-89, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/dmq015

S. Sunkara, V. Rittenberg, N. Raine-fenning, S. Bhattacharya, J. Zamora et al., Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.7, pp.1768-74, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der106

A. Smith, K. Tilling, S. Nelson, and D. Lawlor, Live-Birth Rate Associated With Repeat In Vitro Fertilization Treatment Cycles, JAMA, vol.314, issue.24, pp.2654-62, 2015.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.2015.17296

R. Briggs, G. Kovacs, V. Maclachlan, C. Motteram, and H. Baker, Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod, pp.81-88, 2015.

P. Drakopoulos, C. Blockeel, D. Stoop, M. Camus, M. Vos et al., Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod, pp.370-376, 2016.

B. Kumbak, U. Ulug, B. Erzik, H. Akbas, and M. Bahceci, Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders, Fertility and Sterility, vol.91, issue.1, pp.106-115, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009

F. Ubaldi, L. Rienzi, S. Ferrero, E. Baroni, F. Sapienza et al., Management of poor ovarian responders in IVF, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.10, issue.2, pp.235-281, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60946-7

A. Ferraretti, L. Marca, A. Fauser, B. Tarlatzis, B. Nargund et al., ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.7, pp.1616-1640, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der092

A. Ferraretti and L. Gianaroli, The Bologna criteria for the definition of poor ovarian responders: is there a need for revision?, Human Reproduction, vol.29, issue.9, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deu139

E. Klinkert, F. Broekmans, C. Looman, and E. Te-velde, A poor response in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles, Fertility and Sterility, vol.81, issue.5, pp.1247-53, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.030

A. Busnelli, E. Papaleo, D. Prato, I. Vecchia, E. Iachini et al., A retrospective evaluation of prognosis and cost-effectiveness of IVF in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria, Human Reproduction, vol.30, issue.2, pp.315-337, 2015.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deu319

M. «. Canis, Sans la vie, la science n'est rien ». Contre la sélection avant PMA. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil, mars, vol.39, issue.3, pp.181-183, 2011.

T. Tan, M. Lau, S. Loh, and H. Tan, Female ageing and reproductive outcome in assisted reproduction cycles, Singapore Medical Journal, vol.55, issue.6, pp.305-314, 2014.
DOI : 10.11622/smedj.2014081

G. Serour, R. Mansour, A. Serour, M. Aboulghar, Y. Amin et al., Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above, Fertility and Sterility, vol.94, issue.5, pp.1707-1719, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.044

L. Detti, D. Williams, J. Robins, R. Maxwell, and M. Thomas, A comparison of three downregulation approaches for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization, Fertility and Sterility, vol.84, issue.5, pp.1401-1406, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.053

G. Barrenetxea, J. Agirregoikoa, M. Jiménez, A. Lopez-de-larruzea, T. Ganzabal et al., Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in??vitro fertilization cycles, Fertility and Sterility, vol.89, issue.3, pp.546-53, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.088

V. Weitzman, L. Engmann, A. Diluigi, D. Maier, J. Nulsen et al., Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes, Fertility and Sterility, vol.92, issue.1, pp.226-256, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.024

A. Ferraretti, A. Marca, B. Fauser, B. Tarlatzis, G. Nargund et al., ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.7, pp.1616-1640, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der092

W. Schoolcraft, E. Surrey, D. Minjarez, J. Stevens, and D. Gardner, Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?, Fertility and Sterility, vol.89, issue.1, pp.151-157, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.013

T. Brodin, N. Hadziosmanovic, L. Berglund, M. Olovsson, and J. Holte, Antim??llerian Hormone Levels Are Strongly Associated With Live-Birth Rates After Assisted Reproduction, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol.98, issue.3, pp.1107-1121, 2013.
DOI : 10.1210/jc.2012-3676

A. Weghofer, W. Dietrich, D. Barad, and N. Gleicher, Live birth chances in women with extremely low-serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels, Human Reproduction, vol.26, issue.7, pp.1905-1914, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der134

K. Lukaszuk, M. Kunicki, J. Liss, A. Bednarowska, and G. Jakiel, Probability of live birth in women with extremely low anti-M??llerian hormone concentrations, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.28, issue.1, pp.64-73, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.017

D. Seifer, O. Tal, E. Wantman, P. Edul, and V. Baker, Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for, Fertil Steril. 1 févr, vol.105, issue.2, pp.2012-2013385, 2016.

O. Hamdine, M. Eijkemans, E. Lentjes, H. Torrance, N. Macklon et al., Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Mullerian hormone, Human Reproduction, vol.30, issue.1, pp.170-178, 2015.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/deu266

M. Mutlu, M. Erdem, A. Erdem, S. Yildiz, I. Mutlu et al., Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-m??llerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.18, issue.1, pp.657-65, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-013-9975-3

J. Cohen, N. Chabbert-buffet, and E. Darai, Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder???a plea for universal definitions, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.20, issue.4, pp.1709-1721, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-015-0595-y

H. Yarali, I. Esinler, M. Polat, G. Bozdag, and B. Tiras, Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol, Fertility and Sterility, vol.92, issue.1, pp.231-236, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.057

S. Kim, J. Lee, B. Jee, C. Suh, and S. Kim, What Number of Oocytes Is Appropriate for Defining Poor Ovarian Response?, Yonsei Medical Journal, vol.56, issue.2, pp.482-491, 2015.
DOI : 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.2.482

D. Baird, J. Collins, J. Egozcue, L. Evers, L. Gianaroli et al., Fertility and ageing, Hum Reprod Update. juin, vol.11, issue.3, pp.261-76, 2005.

A. Lintsen, M. Eijkemans, C. Hunault, C. A. Bouwmans, L. Hakkaart et al., Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study, Human Reproduction, vol.22, issue.9, pp.2455-62, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/dem183

N. Gleicher, V. Kushnir, D. Albertini, and D. Barad, Improvements in IVF in women of advanced age, Journal of Endocrinology, vol.230, issue.1, 2016.
DOI : 10.1530/JOE-16-0105

H. Ke, X. Chen, Y. Liu, D. Ye, Y. He et al., Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], vol.10, issue.1, pp.418-440, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11596-013-1134-7

N. Pereira, R. Setton, A. Petrini, J. Lekovich, R. Elias et al., Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with IVF outcomes in young patients with diminished ovarian reserve? Womens Health Lond Engl, mars, vol.12, issue.2, pp.185-92, 2016.

A. Revelli, V. Biasoni, G. Gennarelli, S. Canosa, P. Dalmasso et al., IVF results in patients with very low serum AMH are significantly affected by chronological age, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.33, issue.5, pp.603-612, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-016-0675-7

Y. Tokura, O. Yoshino, S. Ogura-nose, H. Motoyama, M. Harada et al., The significance of serum anti-M??llerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients over age 40 in first IVF treatment, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.26, issue.7, pp.821-826, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-013-9991-3

S. Sahmay, M. Oncul, A. Tuten, A. Tok, A. Ac?kgoz et al., Anti-M??llerian hormone levels as a predictor of the pregnancy rate in women of advanced reproductive age, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.20, issue.5, pp.1469-74, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-014-0324-y

T. Brodin, N. Hadziosmanovic, L. Berglund, M. Olovsson, and J. Holte, Comparing four ovarian reserve markers - associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.27, issue.10, pp.1056-63, 2015.
DOI : 10.1111/aogs.12710

A. Marca, V. Grisendi, S. Giulini, G. Sighinolfi, A. Tirelli et al., Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.94, issue.10, pp.931-938, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s10815-015-0476-4

D. Hendriks, E. Te-velde, C. Looman, L. Bancsi, and F. Broekmans, Expected poor ovarian response in predicting cumulative pregnancy rates: a powerful tool, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol.17, issue.5, pp.727-763, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60323-9