G. Haas, N. Delongchamps, R. Jones, V. Chandan, A. Serio et al., et pertinence d'un dépistage par dosage de l'antigène spécifique de la prostate (PSA) de populations d'hommes à haut risque? [Internet] Disponible à partir de l'URL: http://www.hassante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1238318/cancer-de-la-prostate-identification-des-facteurs-de-risque-et- pertinence-dun-depistage-par-dosage-de-lantigene-specifique-de-la-prostate-psa-de-populations- dhommes-a-haut-risque 2, pp.1484-1493, 2007.

G. Haas, N. Delongchamps, O. Brawley, C. Wang, and G. De-la-roza, The worldwide epidemiology of prostate cancer: perspectives from autopsy studies, Can J Urol, vol.15, issue.1, pp.3866-71, 2008.

A. Jemal, F. Bray, M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward et al., Global cancer statistics, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol.82, issue.19 suppl, pp.69-90, 2011.
DOI : 10.3322/caac.20107

R. Siegel, C. Desantis, K. Virgo, K. Stein, A. Mariotto et al., Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012, Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, pp.220-261, 2012.
DOI : 10.3322/caac.21149

A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, M. Bolla, S. Joniau, M. Mason et al., EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease, European Urology, vol.59, issue.1, pp.61-71, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039

S. Maurice, Institut de veille sanitaire, 2011.

B. Debré, Le dépistage et le traitement du cancer de la prostate-Rapport N°318, 2008.

B. Debré, . Fait-au-nom-de-l, A. Jemal, J. Lortet-tieulent, E. Ward et al., Office parlementaire d'évaluation des politiques de santé Paris: Office Parlementaire d'évaluation des politiques de santé, Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. European Urology. 2012 juin, pp.1079-92, 2009.

J. Surg, A. Patholamico, M. Hui-chen, A. Renshaw, B. Sussman et al., Identifying men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer who are at high risk for death from prostate cancer, J. Urol, vol.29176, issue.116 2, pp.1228-1270, 2005.

P. Humphrey, D. Keetch, D. Smith, D. Shepherd, and W. Catalona, Prospective characterization of pathological features of Prostatic Carcinomas Detected Via Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening, The Journal of Urology, vol.155, issue.3, pp.816-836, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66316-X

T. Stamey, F. Freiha, J. Mcneal, E. Redwine, A. Whittemore et al., Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer, Cancer, vol.140, issue.S3, pp.933-941, 1993.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO;2-L

G. Ploussard, J. Epstein, R. Montironi, P. Carroll, M. Wirth et al., The Contemporary Concept of Significant Versus Insignificant Prostate Cancer, European Urology, vol.60, issue.2, pp.291-303, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.006

S. Sengupta, M. Blute, S. Bagniewski, B. Inman, B. Leibovich et al., After radical retropubic prostatectomy ???insignificant??? prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk ???significant??? cancer, BJU International, vol.23, issue.2, pp.170-174, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07270.x

J. Epstein, D. Chan, L. Sokoll, P. Walsh, J. Cox et al., NONPALPABLE STAGE T1C PROSTATE CANCER, The Journal of Urology, vol.160, issue.6 2, pp.2407-2418, 1998.
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-199812020-00008

P. Bastian, L. Mangold, J. Epstein, and A. Partin, Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer, pp.2001-2006, 2004.

D. Grossklaus, C. Coffey, S. Shappell, G. Jack, and M. Cookson, Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores, BJU International, vol.5, issue.7, pp.722-728, 2001.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02413.x

J. Epstein, H. Sanderson, H. Carter, and D. Scharfstein, Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy, Urology, vol.66, issue.2, pp.356-60, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.002

H. Nakanishi, J. Groskopf, H. Fritsche, V. Bhadkamkar, A. Blase et al., PCA3 Molecular Urine Assay Correlates With Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume: Implication in Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance, The Journal of Urology, vol.179, issue.5, pp.1804-1809, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.013

E. Whitman, J. Groskopf, A. Ali, Y. Chen, A. Blase et al., PCA3 Score Before Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Extracapsular Extension and Tumor Volume, The Journal of Urology, vol.180, issue.5, pp.1975-1978, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.060

M. Auprich, F. Chun, J. Ward, K. Pummer, R. Babaian et al., Critical Assessment of Preoperative Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 on the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Staging, European Urology, vol.59, issue.1, pp.96-105, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.024

G. Ploussard, X. Durand, E. Xylinas, S. Moutereau, C. Radulescu et al., Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Score Accurately Predicts Tumour Volume and Might Help in Selecting Prostate Cancer Patients for Active Surveillance, European Urology, vol.59, issue.3, pp.422-431, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.044

G. Ploussard, E. Xylinas, X. Durand, I. Ouzaïd, Y. Allory et al., Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme, BJU International, vol.55, issue.4, pp.513-520, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09974.x

M. Umbehr, L. Bachmann, U. Held, T. Kessler, T. Sulser et al., Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, European Urology, vol.55, issue.3, pp.575-90, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.019

V. Fradet, J. Kurhanewicz, J. Cowan, A. Karl, F. Coakley et al., Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance: Role of Anatomic MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging, Radiology, vol.256, issue.1, pp.176-83, 2010.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.10091147

J. Miller, C. Perumalla, and G. Heap, Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy, ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol.163, issue.1-2, pp.48-50, 2005.
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-200109000-00011

T. Hossack, M. Patel, A. Huo, P. Brenner, C. Yuen et al., Location and Pathological Characteristics of Cancers in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Identified by Transperineal Biopsy Compared to Transrectal Biopsy, The Journal of Urology, vol.188, issue.3
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.006

K. Hodge, J. Mcneal, M. Terris, T. Stamey, J. De-la-rosette et al., Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate Optimizing prostate cancer detection: 8 versus 12-core biopsy protocol, J. Urol. J. Urol, vol.142182, issue.304, pp.71-74, 1989.

K. Eichler, S. Hempel, J. Wilby, L. Myers, L. Bachmann et al., Diagnostic Value of Systematic Biopsy Methods in the Investigation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, The Journal of Urology, vol.175, issue.5, pp.1605-1617, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00957-2

V. Ficarra, G. Novella, G. Novara, A. Galfano, M. Pea et al., The Potential Impact of Prostate Volume in the Planning of Optimal Number of Cores in the Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsy, European Urology, vol.48, issue.6, pp.932-939, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.008

R. Serfling, M. Shulman, G. Thompson, Z. Xiao, E. Benaim et al., Quantifying the Impact of Prostate Volumes, Number of Biopsy Cores and 5??-Reductase Inhibitor Therapy on the Probability of Prostate Cancer Detection Using Mathematical Modeling, The Journal of Urology, vol.177, issue.6, pp.2352-2358, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.116

R. Uzzo, J. Wei, R. Waldbaum, A. Perlmutter, J. Byrne et al., The influence of prostate size on cancer detection, Urology, vol.46, issue.6, pp.831-837, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80353-7

J. Applewhite, B. Matlaga, and D. Mccullough, Results of the 5 Region Prostate Biopsy Method:, The Journal of Urology, vol.168, issue.2, pp.500-503, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-200208000-00021

M. Levine, M. Ittman, J. Melamed, and H. Lepor, TWO CONSECUTIVE SETS OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED SEXTANT BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE FOR THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER, The Journal of Urology, vol.159, issue.2, pp.471-475, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63951-X

B. Djavan, M. Waldert, A. Zlotta, P. Dobronski, C. Seitz et al., SAFETY AND MORBIDITY OF FIRST AND REPEAT TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES:, The Journal of Urology, vol.166, issue.3, pp.856-60, 2001.
DOI : 10.1097/00005392-200109000-00013

F. Wagenlehner, E. Van-oostrum, P. Tenke, Z. Tandogdu, M. Cek et al., Infective Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, A Prospective Multinational Multicentre Prostate Biopsy Study. European urology [Internet]. 2012 juin 12

B. Helfand, A. Glaser, K. Rimar, S. Zargaroff, J. Hedges et al., Prostate cancer diagnosis is associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction after prostate biopsy, BJU International, vol.5, issue.1, p.40, 22639942.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11268.x

T. Klein, R. Palisaar, A. Holz, M. Brock, J. Noldus et al., The Impact of Prostate Biopsy and Periprostatic Nerve Block on Erectile and Voiding Function: A Prospective Study, The Journal of Urology, vol.184, issue.4, pp.1447-52, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.021

C. Moore, N. Robertson, N. Arsanious, T. Middleton, A. Villers et al., Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging???Derived Targets: A Systematic Review, European urology [Internet]. 2012 juin 13 ; Disponble à partir de l'URL, p.22743165
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.004

J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, G. Haber, X. Leroy et al., Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection, BJU International, vol.241, issue.8b, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10112.x

G. Giannarini, G. Petralia, H. Thoeny, N. De-souza, S. Riches et al., Potential and limitations of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer including pelvic lymph node staging: a critical analysis of the literature A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance, Eur. Urol. Eur. Urol, vol.6156, issue.26, pp.326-40981, 2009.

H. Vargas, O. Akin, A. Shukla-dave, J. Zhang, K. Zakian et al., Performance Characteristics of MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Clinically Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study. Radiology [Internet]. 2012 sept 5

B. Turkbey, H. Mani, V. Shah, A. Rastinehad, M. Bernardo et al., Multiparametric 3T Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cancer: Histopathological Correlation Using Prostatectomy Specimens Processed in Customized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Molds, The Journal of Urology, vol.186, issue.5, pp.1818-1842, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.013

T. Hambrock, D. Somford, H. Huisman, I. Oort, . Van et al., Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer, Radiology, vol.259, issue.2, pp.453-61, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.11091409

E. Trabulsi, D. Sackett, L. Gomella, and E. Halpern, Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound Modalities in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer, Urology, vol.76, issue.5, pp.1025-1058, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.022

M. Brock, C. Von-bodman, R. Palisaar, B. Löppenberg, F. Sommerer et al., The Impact of Real-Time Elastography Guiding a Systematic Prostate Biopsy to Improve Cancer Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of 353 Patients, The Journal of Urology, vol.187, issue.6, pp.2039-2082, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.063

L. Klotz, L. Zhang, A. Lam, R. Nam, A. Mamedov et al., Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.28, issue.1, pp.126-157, 2010.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180

H. Carter, J. Sauvageot, P. Walsh, and J. Epstein, Prospective Evaluation of Men With Stage T1C Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, The Journal of Urology, vol.157, issue.6, pp.2206-2215, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64719-0

G. Ploussard, A. De-la-taille, S. Terry, Y. Allory, I. Ouzaïd et al., Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance, Urologic oncology [Internet]. 2012 janv 31 ; Disponible à partir de l'URL, p.22300755

N. Lawrentschuk, T. A. Lockwood, G. Evans, A. Finelli, A. et al., Operator is an Independent Predictor of Detecting Prostate Cancer at Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy, The Journal of Urology, vol.182, issue.6, pp.2659-63, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.036

S. Hori, O. Fuge, K. Trabucchi, P. Donaldson, and J. Mcloughlin, Can a trained non-physician provider perform transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies as effectively as an experienced urologist? BJU international [Internet]. 2012 juin 21
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11294.x

P. Mozer, J. Troccaz, and D. Stoianovici, Urologic robots and future directions, Current Opinion in Urology, vol.19, issue.1, pp.114-123, 2009.
DOI : 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831cc1ba

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00346648

J. Bax, D. Cool, L. Gardi, K. Knight, D. Smith et al., Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys, pp.5397-410, 2008.
DOI : 10.1118/1.3002415

M. Baumann, P. Mozer, V. Daanen, and J. Troccaz, Towards 3D??Ultrasound Image Based Soft Tissue Tracking: A Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Image Alignment System, MICCAI, issue.2, pp.26-33, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00193084

S. Xu, J. Kruecker, P. Guion, N. Glossop, Z. Neeman et al., Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy. MICCAI (1), pp.128-163, 2007.

G. Andriole, T. Bullock, J. Belani, E. Traxel, Y. Yan et al., Is There a Better Way to Biopsy the Prostate? Prospects for a Novel Transrectal Systematic Biopsy Approach, Urology, vol.70, issue.6, pp.22-28, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1128

A. Krieger, C. Csoma, I. Iordachita, P. Guion, A. Singh et al., Design and Preliminary Accuracy Studies of an MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Intervention System, MICCAI, issue.2, pp.59-67, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_8

C. Schneider, A. Okamura, and G. Fichtinger, A Robotic System for Transrectal Needle Insertion into the Prostate with Integrated Ultrasound. ICRA, pp.365-70, 2004.

G. Fichtinger, J. Fiene, C. Kennedy, G. Kronreif, I. Iordachita et al., Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. Med Image Anal, pp.535-580, 2008.

E. Dombre, G. Duchemin, P. Poignet, and F. Pierrot, Dermarob: a safe robot for reconstructive surgery, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol.19, issue.5, pp.876-84, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/TRA.2003.817067

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00004515

F. Pierrot, E. Dombre, E. Dégoulange, L. Urbain, P. Caron et al., Hippocrate: a safe robot arm for medical applications with force feedback. Med Image Anal, pp.285-300, 1999.

M. Jakopec, F. Baena, S. Harris, P. Gomes, J. Cobb et al., The hands-on orthopaedic robot "acrobot": early clinical trials of total knee replacement surgery, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol.19, issue.5, pp.902-913, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/TRA.2003.817510

O. Schneider and J. Troccaz, A Six-Degree-of-Freedom Passive Arm with Dynamic Constraints (PADyC) for Cardiac Surgery Application: Preliminary Experiments, Computer Aided Surgery, vol.8, issue.6, pp.340-51, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/PL00001995

N. Zemiti, T. Ortmaier, M. Vitrani, and G. Morel, A Force Controlled Laparoscopic Surgical Robot without Distal Force Sensing. ISER, pp.153-64, 2004.

P. Abolmaesumi, S. Salcudean, W. Zhu, M. Sirouspour, and S. Dimaio, Image-guided control of a robot for medical ultrasound, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol.18, issue.1, pp.11-23, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/70.988970

R. Alterovitz, K. Goldberg, J. Pouliot, I. Hsu, Y. Kim et al., Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. Med Phys Automated Finite- Element Analysis for Deformable Registration of Prostate Images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol.3326, issue.7210, pp.446-541379, 2006.

M. Baumann, P. Mozer, V. Daanen, and J. Troccaz, Prostate Biopsy Tracking with Deformation Estimation. Medical Image Analysis
DOI : 10.1016/j.media.2011.01.008

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00606407

S. Martin, J. Troccaz, and V. Daanenc, Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model. Med Phys, pp.1579-90, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00456598

S. Martin, M. Baumann, V. Daanen, and J. Troccaz, MR prior based automatic segmentation of the prostate in TRUS images for MR/TRUS data fusion, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp.640-643, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490093

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00477748

. Disponible-À-partir-de-l-'url, A. Takenaka, R. Hara, T. Ishimura, T. Fujii et al., archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00477748/ 76 A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy

R. Hara, J. Y. Fujii, T. Kondo, N. Yokoyoma, T. Miyaji et al., Optimal Approach for Prostate Cancer Detection as Initial Biopsy: Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Transperineal Versus Transrectal Systematic 12-Core Biopsy, Urology, vol.71, issue.2, pp.191-196, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.029

G. Ploussard, E. Xylinas, L. Salomon, Y. Allory, D. Vordos et al., The Role of Biopsy Core Number in Selecting Prostate Cancer Patients for Active Surveillance, European Urology, vol.56, issue.6, pp.891-899, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.053

I. Ouzaid, E. Xylinas, A. Campeggi, A. Hoznek, D. Vordos et al., Contemporary pathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of prostate cancers missed by 6- and 12-core biopsy and diagnosed with a 21-core biopsy protocol, World Journal of Urology, vol.57, issue.1, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-011-0800-2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00864576

S. Hong, B. Han, S. Lee, S. Kim, K. Min et al., Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (???12)-core prostate biopsy, World Journal of Urology, vol.69, issue.2, pp.271-277, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-008-0343-3

T. Klein, R. Palisaar, A. Holz, M. Brock, J. Noldus et al., The Impact of Prostate Biopsy and Periprostatic Nerve Block on Erectile and Voiding Function: A Prospective Study, The Journal of Urology, vol.184, issue.4, pp.1447-52, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.021

I. Jeong, J. Kim, K. Cho, D. You, C. Song et al., Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Unilateral Prostate Cancer on Extended Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Accuracy of Laterality and Implications for Hemi-Ablative Therapy, The Journal of Urology, vol.184, issue.5, pp.1963-1972, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.136

M. Roethke, A. Anastasiadis, M. Lichy, M. Werner, P. Wagner et al., MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy, World Journal of Urology, vol.15, issue.Suppl 1
DOI : 10.1007/s00345-011-0675-2

P. Harnden, B. Naylor, M. Shelley, H. Clements, B. Coles et al., The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: What are the risks of progression?, Cancer, vol.334, issue.5, pp.971-81, 2008.
DOI : 10.1002/cncr.23277

F. Abdollah, G. Novara, A. Briganti, V. Scattoni, M. Raber et al., Trans-rectal Versus Trans-Perineal Saturation Rebiopsy of the Prostate: Is There a Difference in Cancer Detection Rate? Urology Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasoundguided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, vol.77110, issue.872 2, pp.921-926, 2011.

P. Pinto, P. Chung, A. Rastinehad, A. Baccala, . Jr et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The Journal of Urology, vol.186, issue.4, pp.1281-1286, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.078

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193933

B. Hadaschik, T. Kuru, C. Tulea, P. Rieker, I. Popeneciu et al., A Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Pre-Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasound Fusion, The Journal of Urology, vol.186, issue.6, pp.2214-2234, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.102

O. Ukimura, M. Desai, S. Palmer, S. Valencerina, M. Gross et al., 3-dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion mars, J. Urol, vol.187, issue.3, pp.20121080-20121086

D. Portalez, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, R. Renard-penna, V. Misrai et al., Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scoring System for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Cohort of Repeat Biopsy Patients, European Urology, vol.62, issue.6
DOI : 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044