A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease, Eur Heart J, vol.24, pp.1231-1243, 2003. ,
Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study, The Lancet, vol.368, issue.9540, pp.1005-1011, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention, Heart, vol.92, issue.8, pp.1022-1031, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1861088
Impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aoric valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve, J Heart valve Dis, vol.7, pp.211-219, 1998. ,
Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve remplacement, Circulation, vol.102, pp.5-9, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-5
New design bioprosthesis: early outcome of Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna in the small annular aortic position, Journal of Artificial Organs, vol.35, issue.4, pp.284-292, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10047-011-0579-3
Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.39, issue.6, pp.844-52, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.015
Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of the Hancock II Versus the Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses, Circulation, vol.122, issue.11_suppl_1, pp.10-16, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928085
Prosthesis???Patient Mismatch is Not Clinically Relevant in Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Valve, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol.82, issue.2 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.089
15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses, Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, vol.71, issue.5, pp.200-205, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1177/021849230601400306
Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience, Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol.16, issue.2, pp.112-117, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/icvts/ivs460
Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol.147, pp.1553-60, 2014. ,
Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol.148, issue.5, pp.1940-1946, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.051
Jude Trifecta Aortic Bioprosthesis : Results from a French Multicenter Study, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, vol.27, issue.6, pp.590-597, 2014. ,
Haemodynamic performance of a new pericardial aortic bioprosthesis during exercise and recovery: comparison with pulmonary autograft, stentless aortic bioprosthesis and healthy control groups, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.44, issue.4, pp.295-301, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejcts/ezt367
Hemodynamic Comparison Between Trifecta and Freestyle Aortic Valve During Exercise in Patients with Small Aortic Root, Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol.147, issue.5, pp.400-404, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1111/jocs.12536
Randomized comparison of exercise haemodynamics of Freestyle, Magna Ease and Trifecta bioprostheses after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.50, issue.2, pp.1-7 ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejcts/ezv493
Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement, Circulation, vol.108, issue.8, pp.983-991, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32
Early and midterm outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the St, 2019. ,
Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol.69, issue.3, pp.817-839, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01409-5
Exercise Echocardiography in Cryopreserved Aortic Homografts: Comparison of a Prototype Stentless, a Stented Bioprosthesis, and Native Aortic Valves, Echocardiography, vol.65, issue.6, pp.1204-1214, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.00940.x
Early hemodynamic performance of the third generation St Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol.149, issue.6, pp.149-1567, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.043
Comprehensive Hemodynamic Comparison and Frequency of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol.27, issue.6, pp.581-589, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.002
The TRIBECA study: (TRI)fecta (B)ioprosthesis (E)valuation versus (C)arpentier Magna-Ease in (A)ortic position, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.49, issue.2, pp.478-85, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejcts/ezv070
Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol.83, issue.4, pp.83-619, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00930-8