I. Monier, B. Blondel, A. Ego, M. Kaminiski, F. Goffinet et al., Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.35, issue.4, pp.518-545
DOI : 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00210.x

D. Mcintire, S. Bloom, B. Casey, and K. Leveno, Birth Weight in Relation to Morbidity and Mortality among Newborn Infants, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.340, issue.16, pp.1234-1242, 1999.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199904223401603

C. Ananth and A. Vintzileos, Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies, Early Human Development, vol.85, issue.10, pp.653-661, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.004

V. Flenady, L. Koopmans, P. Middleton, J. Frøen, G. Smith et al., Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, The Lancet, vol.377, issue.9774, pp.1331-1371, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7

J. Gardosi, V. Madurasinghe, M. Williams, A. Malik, and A. Francis, Maternal and Fetal Risk Factors for Stillbirth, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.68, issue.5, p.108, 2013.
DOI : 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31829183a7

C. Vayssière, L. Sentilhes, A. Ego, C. Bernard, D. Cambourieu et al., Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.193, pp.10-18, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021

A. Von-beckerath, M. Kollmann, C. Rotky-fast, E. Karpf, U. Lang et al., Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.208, issue.2, pp.130-131, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.014

M. Jozwiak, O. Rengerink, K. , T. Eikelder, M. Van-pampus et al., Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.170, issue.1, pp.137-182, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017

A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, M. Agosti, M. Serati, S. Uccella et al., Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.204, issue.4, pp.338-339, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029

M. Jozwiak, O. Rengerink, K. Benthem, M. Van-beek, E. Dijksterhuis et al., Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.378, issue.9809, pp.2095-103, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0

M. Jozwiak, K. Bloemenkamp, A. Kelly, B. Mol, O. Irion et al., Mechanical methods for induction of labour, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.38, issue.4, p.1233, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.CD001233

J. Thomas, A. Fairclough, J. Kavanagh, and A. Kelly, Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.3101, 2014.

B. Blondel, N. Lelong, M. Kermarrec, and F. Goffinet, La sant?? p??rinatale en France m??tropolitaine de 1995???? 2010. R??sultats des enqu??tes nationales p??rinatales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.2, pp.151-66
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.008

C. Flamant and G. Gascoin, Devenir pr??coce et prise en charge n??onatale du nouveau-n?? petit pour l?????ge gestationnel, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.42, issue.8, pp.985-95, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.020

I. Guellec, A. Lapillonne, S. Renolleau, M. Charlaluk, R. J. Marret et al., Neurologic Outcomes at School Age in Very Preterm Infants Born With Severe or Mild Growth Restriction, PEDIATRICS, vol.127, issue.4, pp.883-891, 2011.
DOI : 10.1542/peds.2010-2442

G. Gascoin and C. Flamant, Cons??quences ?? long terme des enfants n??s dans un contexte de retard de croissance intra-ut??rin et/ou petits pour l?????ge gestationnel, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.42, issue.8, pp.911-931, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.014

A. Baschat, Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.93, issue.5, pp.501-515, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/adc.2007.120485

V. Seravalli and A. Baschat, A Uniform Management Approach to Optimize Outcome in Fetal Growth Restriction, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol.42, issue.2, pp.275-88
DOI : 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.005

. Grit-study and . Group, A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.76, issue.2, 2003.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020112.x

C. Lees, N. Marlow, A. Van-wassenaer-leemhuis, B. Arabin, C. Bilardo et al., 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial, The Lancet, vol.385, issue.9983, pp.2162-72, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3

F. Perrotin, E. Simon, J. Potin, and M. Laffon, Modalit??s de naissance du f??tus porteur d???un RCIU, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.42, issue.8, pp.975-84, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.019

N. Melamed, G. Klinger, K. Tenenbaum-gavish, T. Herscovici, N. Linder et al., Short-term Neonatal Outcome in Low-Risk, Spontaneous, Singleton, Late Preterm Deliveries, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.114, issue.2, Part 1, pp.253-60, 2009.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181af6931

K. Boers, S. Vijgen, D. Bijlenga, J. A. Van-der-post, D. Bekedam et al., Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT), BMJ, vol.341, issue.dec21 1, p.7087, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c7087

A. Trudell, A. Cahill, M. Tuuli, G. Macones, and A. Odibo, Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013.

C. Pennell, J. Henderson, O. Neill, M. Mcchlery, S. Mccleery et al., Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.123, issue.5 part 1, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x

S. Ahmed, W. Ibrahim, Z. Ashor, O. Mohamed, M. Ahmed et al., Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016.

E. Mei-dan, A. Walfisch, C. Valencia, and M. Hallak, Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.73, issue.17, 2014.
DOI : 10.3109/14767058.2011.591459

A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, S. Uccella, M. Agosti, M. Serati et al., A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.207, issue.2, pp.125-126, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020

M. Sarreau, L. Leufflen, E. Monceau, D. Tariel, P. Villemonteix et al., Maturation du col ut??rin d??favorable par ballonnet supra-cervical sur ut??rus cicatriciel??: ??tude r??trospective multicentrique de 151??patientes, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.43, issue.1, pp.46-55
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.06.006

R. Levy, B. Kanengiser, B. Furman, B. Arie, A. Brown et al., A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.191, issue.5, pp.1632-1638, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.033

S. Delaney, B. Shaffer, Y. Cheng, J. Vargas, T. Sparks et al., Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.115, issue.6, pp.1239-1284, 2010.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0

G. Fruhman, J. Gavard, E. Amon, K. Flick, C. Miller et al., Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.216, issue.1, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.082

K. Gibson, B. Mercer, and J. Louis, Inner thigh taping vs traction for cervical ripening with a??Foley catheter: a??randomized controlled trial, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.209, issue.3, pp.272-273, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.028

M. Jozwiak, O. Rengerink, K. , T. Eikelder, M. Van-pampus et al., Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.170, issue.1, pp.137-182, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017

A. Hohlbein and J. Heinrich, Significance of internal tocography and intrapartal tocolysis in the management of labor]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, pp.619-643, 1986.

W. Rath and S. Kehl, The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, vol.75, issue.11, pp.1130-1139
DOI : 10.1055/s-0035-1558094

J. Cirier, C. Diguisto, C. Arlicot, C. Denis, J. Potin et al., Mechanical methods for cervical ripening in France: An evaluation of professional practices]. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil, 2015.

R. Hershkovitz, O. Erez, E. Sheiner, A. Bashiri, B. Furman et al., Comparison study between induced and spontaneous term and preterm births of small-for-gestational-age neonates, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.97, issue.2, pp.141-147, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00517-0

H. Wang, S. Hong, Y. Liu, Y. Duan, and H. Yin, Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.198, issue.14, pp.2382-2390, 2016.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7

P. Chavakula, S. Benjamin, A. Abraham, V. Londhe, V. Jeyaseelan et al., Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.4, issue.8
DOI : 10.3109/00016349.2010.499447

M. Jonsson, C. Hellgren, E. Wiberg-itzel, and H. Akerud, Assessment of pain in women randomly allocated to speculum or digital insertion of the Foley catheter for induction of labor, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.114, issue.2 Pt 1, pp.997-1004, 2011.
DOI : 10.1159/000009986

A. Henry, A. Madan, R. Reid, S. Tracy, K. Austin et al., Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol.117, issue.2, p.25, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02611.x

J. Heinemann, G. Gillen, L. Sanchez-ramos, and A. Kaunitz, Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.199, issue.2, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.005

K. Mcmaster, L. Sanchez-ramos, and A. Kaunitz, Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.126, issue.3, p.2015
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002

I. Cabrera, J. Quiñones, D. Durie, J. Rust, J. Smulian et al., Use of intracervical balloons and chorioamnionitis in term premature rupture of membranes, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.136, issue.6, pp.967-71, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.035

K. Horowitz and D. Feldman, Fetal growth restriction: risk factors for unplanned primary cesarean delivery, J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet, vol.28, issue.18, pp.2131-2135, 2015.

F. Figueras, S. Savchev, S. Triunfo, F. Crovetto, and E. Gratacos, An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.122, issue.3, pp.279-85, 2015.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000020

R. Garcia-simon, F. Figueras, S. Savchev, E. Fabre, E. Gratacos et al., Cervical condition and fetal cerebral Doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.14, issue.6, pp.713-720, 2015.
DOI : 10.1111/jog.12077

J. Gardosi, A. Chang, B. Kalyan, D. Sahota, and E. Symonds, Customised antenatal growth charts, The Lancet, vol.339, issue.8788, pp.283-290, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91342-6

A. Ego, D. Subtil, G. Grange, O. Thiebaugeorges, M. Senat et al., Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: A French multicenter study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.194, issue.4, pp.1042-1051, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.816

L. Mccowan, J. Harding, and A. Stewart, Customized Birthweight Centiles Predict SGA Pregnancies With Perinatal Morbidity, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.61, issue.1, pp.1026-1059, 2005.
DOI : 10.1097/01.ogx.0000193848.78057.79

J. Verlijsdonk, B. Winkens, K. Boers, S. Scherjon, and F. Roumen, Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.374, issue.3, pp.938-981, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60736-4

A. Aviram, Y. Yogev, R. Bardin, I. Meizner, A. Wiznitzer et al., Small for gestational age newborns ??? does pre-recognition make a difference in pregnancy outcome?, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.32, issue.13, 2015.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c7087

B. Louis, G. Grewal, J. Albert, P. Sciscione, A. Wing et al., Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015.

A. Papageorghiou, E. Ohuma, D. Altman, T. Todros, C. Ismail et al., International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project, The Lancet, vol.384, issue.9946, pp.869-79, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2

?. Cesarienne, ?. Avb-cause:-arcf-/-stagnation-ou-autre, and :. , Extraction : oui / non ANALGESIE, ANESTHESIE MATERNELLE