Guidelines for Vaginal Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth Number 155 (Replaces Guideline Number 147) and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 89, International Journal of Gynaecology, issue.3, 2005. ,
« Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.345, issue.1, 2001. ,
Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.29, issue.11, p.11, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)31033-7
« Disruption of Prior Uterine Incision Following Misoprostol for Labor Induction in Women with Previous Cesarean Delivery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.91, issue.5 2, 1998. ,
Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.113, issue.1, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00363-4
Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.180, issue.6, pp.6-7, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70049-9
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1 ) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.180, issue.6, pp.6-7, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70051-7
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.351, p.25, 2004. ,
« [National survey on the use of induced labor by obstetricians. Study Group on Induced Labor] », Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction, vol.28, issue.4, 1999. ,
Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.203, issue.5, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038
Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.170, issue.1, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017
Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.378, issue.9809, p.9809, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0
Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.91, issue.5 Pt 2, pp.17-2016 ,
DOI : 10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297
Mariëlle van Pampus, et al. « Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROBAAT-M Study) and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature, American Journal of Perinatology, vol.31, issue.2, 2014. ,
Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.123, issue.5 part 1, p.11, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1080/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x
Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.123, issue.3, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1542/peds.2008-2407
« [Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients] », Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction, vol.43, issue.1, 2014. ,
Risque de rupture ut??rine apr??s maturation des ut??rus cicatriciels par sonde ?? ballonnet, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.45, issue.5, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.06.001
Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.12, issue.1, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1080/713605582
Cervical Ripening With Transcervical Foley Catheter and the Risk of Uterine Rupture, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.103, issue.1, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1
Single-Balloon Compared With Double-Balloon Catheters for Induction of Labor, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.118, issue.1, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7
« Transcervical Foley's Catheter versus Cook Balloon for Cervical Ripening in Stillbirth with a Scarred Uterus: A Randomized Controlled Trial ». The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine: The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, Perinatal Obstetricians, vol.28, p.10, 2015. ,
« Comparison of Two Mechanical Devices for Cervical Ripening: A Prospective Quasi-Randomized Trial ». The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine: The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, Perinatal Obstetricians, vol.25, issue.6, 2012. ,
Veronica Arlant, et Pierfrancesco Bolis. « Is Transcervical Foley Catheter Actually Slower than Prostaglandins in Ripening the Cervix? A Randomized Study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.204, issue.4, 2011. ,
Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial, PLOS ONE, vol.199, issue.338, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0136856.s006
Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.115, issue.6, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0
A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.191, issue.5, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.033
Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.216, issue.1, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.082
Transcervical Foley Catheter With and Without Extraamniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.110, issue.3, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278077.30890.87
« Induction of Labor Using a Foley Balloon, with and without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.107, issue.2, 2006. ,
Quels facteurs influencent la voie d???accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur ut??rus cicatriciel???, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.12-2012, 3682315. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.032
The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.193, issue.3, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066
Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.26, issue.1, pp.29-32, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04540.x
Ripening of the Unfavorable Cervix With Extraamniotic Catheter Balloon, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.51, issue.10, pp.621-648, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00006254-199610000-00022