. Society, G. Obstetricians, C. «. Sogc-clinical-practice, and . Guidelines, Guidelines for Vaginal Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth Number 155 (Replaces Guideline Number 147) and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 89, International Journal of Gynaecology, issue.3, 2005.

M. Lydon-rochelle, V. L. Holt, T. R. Easterling, and D. P. Martin, « Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.345, issue.1, 2001.

G. A. Dekker, A. Chan, C. G. Luke, K. Priest, M. Riley et al., Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.29, issue.11, p.11, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)31033-7

D. A. Wing, K. Lovett, and R. H. Paul, « Disruption of Prior Uterine Incision Following Misoprostol for Labor Induction in Women with Previous Cesarean Delivery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.91, issue.5 2, 1998.

H. Aslan, E. Unlu, M. Agar, and . Et-yavuz-ceylan, Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.113, issue.1, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00363-4

M. M. Plaut, M. L. Schwartz, and S. L. Lubarsky, Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.180, issue.6, pp.6-7, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70049-9

H. A. Blanchette, S. Nayak, and E. S. Erasmus, Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1 ) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.180, issue.6, pp.6-7, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70051-7

M. B. Landon, C. John, K. J. Hauth, C. Y. Leveno, S. Spong et al., Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.351, p.25, 2004.

F. Goffinet, R. Humbert, P. Clerson, H. J. Philippe, G. Bréart et al., « [National survey on the use of induced labor by obstetricians. Study Group on Induced Labor] », Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction, vol.28, issue.4, 1999.

Z. Vaknin, Y. Kurzweil, and D. Sherman, Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.203, issue.5, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038

M. Jozwiak, K. Oude-rengerink, L. G. Mieke, M. G. Eikelder, M. G. Van-pampus et al., Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.170, issue.1, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017

M. Jozwiak, K. Oude-rengerink, M. Benthem, E. Van-beek, G. Marja et al., Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.378, issue.9809, p.9809, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0

Y. M. Du, L. Y. Zhu, L. N. Cui, B. H. Jin, and J. L. Ou, Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.91, issue.5 Pt 2, pp.17-2016
DOI : 10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297

M. Jozwiak, K. Mieke-ten-eikelder, C. Oude-rengerink, H. De-groot, M. Feitsma et al., Mariëlle van Pampus, et al. « Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol: Randomized Controlled Trial (PROBAAT-M Study) and Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature, American Journal of Perinatology, vol.31, issue.2, 2014.

C. Pennell, J. Henderson, O. Mj, . Neill, D. Mccleery et al., Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.123, issue.5 part 1, p.11, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x

M. Jozwiak, H. A. Van-de-lest, N. B. Burger, M. G. Dijksterhuis, J. W. et al., Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.123, issue.3, 2014.
DOI : 10.1542/peds.2008-2407

M. Sarreau, L. Leufflen, E. Monceau, D. Tariel, P. Villemonteix et al., « [Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients] », Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction, vol.43, issue.1, 2014.

C. Lamourdedieu, A. Gnisci, and E. A. Agostini, Risque de rupture ut??rine apr??s maturation des ut??rus cicatriciels par sonde ?? ballonnet, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.45, issue.5, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.06.001

Z. Ben-aroya, M. Hallak, D. Segal, M. Friger, M. Katz et al., Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.12, issue.1, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/713605582

E. Bujold, S. C. Blackwell, and R. J. Gauthier, Cervical Ripening With Transcervical Foley Catheter and the Risk of Uterine Rupture, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.103, issue.1, 2004.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1

R. Salim, N. Zafran, Z. Nachum, G. Garmi, N. Kraiem et al., Single-Balloon Compared With Double-Balloon Catheters for Induction of Labor, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.118, issue.1, 2011.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7

M. T. Rab, A. Gadel, F. Baset, K. A. Mohammed, . Zahran et al., « Transcervical Foley's Catheter versus Cook Balloon for Cervical Ripening in Stillbirth with a Scarred Uterus: A Randomized Controlled Trial ». The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine: The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, Perinatal Obstetricians, vol.28, p.10, 2015.

. Mei-dan, A. Elad, S. Walfisch, M. Suarez-easton, and . Hallak, « Comparison of Two Mechanical Devices for Cervical Ripening: A Prospective Quasi-Randomized Trial ». The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine: The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, Perinatal Obstetricians, vol.25, issue.6, 2012.

A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, M. Agosti, M. Serati, and S. Uccella, Veronica Arlant, et Pierfrancesco Bolis. « Is Transcervical Foley Catheter Actually Slower than Prostaglandins in Ripening the Cervix? A Randomized Study, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.204, issue.4, 2011.

N. Gu, T. Ru, Z. Wang, Y. Dai, M. Zheng et al., Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial, PLOS ONE, vol.199, issue.338, 2015.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0136856.s006

S. Delaney, B. L. Shaffer, Y. W. Cheng, J. Vargas, T. N. Sparks et al., Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.115, issue.6, 2010.
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0

R. Levy, B. Kanengiser, B. Furman, A. Ben-arie, D. Brown et al., A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.191, issue.5, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.033

G. Fruhman, J. A. Gavard, E. Amon, K. V. Flick, C. Miller et al., Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.216, issue.1, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.082

M. G. Lin, K. J. Reid, M. R. Treaster, F. S. Nuthalapaty, P. S. Ramsey et al., Transcervical Foley Catheter With and Without Extraamniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.110, issue.3, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278077.30890.87

N. W. Karjane, L. Ellen, S. W. Brock, and . Walsh, « Induction of Labor Using a Foley Balloon, with and without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.107, issue.2, 2006.

J. Haumonté, M. Raylet, L. Sabiani, O. Franké, F. Bretelle et al., Quels facteurs influencent la voie d???accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur ut??rus cicatriciel???, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.12-2012, 3682315.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.032

M. B. Landon, S. Leindecker, C. Y. Spong, J. C. Hauth, S. Bloom et al., The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.193, issue.3, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066

J. Atad, M. Hallak, Y. Ben-david, R. Auslender, and H. Abramovici, Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.26, issue.1, pp.29-32, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04540.x

D. J. Sherman, E. Frenkel, J. Tovbin, S. Arieli, E. Caspi et al., Ripening of the Unfavorable Cervix With Extraamniotic Catheter Balloon, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.51, issue.10, pp.621-648, 1996.
DOI : 10.1097/00006254-199610000-00022