Elastic fibre organization in the intervertebral discs of the bovine tail, Journal of Anatomy, vol.201, issue.6, pp.465-75, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00111.x
Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals. Spine, pp.934-974, 2009. ,
Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine, pp.2679-90, 2004. ,
Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.609-627, 2011. ,
Clinical Impact of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters on Disc Degeneration in Young Adults, Medicine, vol.94, issue.42, p.1833, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1097/MD.0000000000001833
Thoracal flat back is a risk factor for lumbar disc degeneration after scoliosis surgery, The Spine Journal, vol.14, issue.6, pp.925-957, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.426
Patterns of lumbar disc degeneration are different in degenerative disc disease and disc prolapse magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 224 patients, The Spine Journal, vol.14, issue.2, pp.300-307 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.042
Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine, Jul, vol.922, issue.1514, pp.1642-1647, 1997. ,
Heredity of Low Back Pain in a Young Population: A Classical Twin Study, Twin Research, vol.7, issue.1, pp.16-26, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1375/13690520460741408
Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, J Rheumatol, vol.2015, issue.116, pp.1911-1919, 1993. ,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disc Degeneration, Spine, vol.12, issue.3, pp.276-81, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-198704000-00016
Intervertebral disc degeneration: New insights based on ???skipped??? level disc pathology, Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol.61, issue.Suppl, pp.2392-400, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729099
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.27523/pdf
Are ???Patterns??? of Lumbar Disc Degeneration Associated With Low Back Pain?, Spine, vol.37, issue.7, pp.430-438, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182304dfc
Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.1407-1429, 2008. ,
Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.1289-99, 2008. ,
The association of combination of disc degeneration, end plate signal change, and Schmorl node with low back pain in a large population study: the Wakayama Spine Study, The Spine Journal, vol.15, issue.4, pp.622-630, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.012
Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain, The Lancet, vol.354, issue.9178, pp.581-586, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4
Prospective clinical study on natural history of discogenic low back pain at 4 years of follow-up. Pain Physician, 2012. ,
The Use of Intradiscal Steroid Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Discogenic Pain, Spine, vol.29, issue.8, pp.525-557, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00002
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Selected Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain, Spine, vol.36, issue.5, pp.347-54, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d0c944
Standalone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.2136-2179, 2014. ,
Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine: results with a 2-year follow-up. Spine, pp.894-901, 2014. ,
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Discogenic Low Back Pain, Medicine, vol.94, issue.43 ,
DOI : 10.1097/MD.0000000000001851
URL : http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/md-journal/2015/10270/Anterior_Lumbar_Interbody_Fusion_for_Degenerative.49.pdf?token=method|ExpireAbsolute;source|Journals;ttl|1506956340975;payload|mY8D3u1TCCsNvP5E421JYK6N6XICDamxByyYpaNzk7FKjTaa1Yz22MivkHZqjGP4kdS2v0J76WGAnHACH69s21Csk0OpQi3YbjEMdSoz2UhVybFqQxA7lKwSUlA502zQZr96TQRwhVlocEp/sJ586aVbcBFlltKNKo+tbuMfL73hiPqJliudqs17cHeLcLbV/CqjlP3IO0jGHlHQtJWcICDdAyGJMnpi6RlbEJaRheGeh5z5uvqz3FLHgPKVXJzddFRrD2hcIwdDP9eSnSkfs1jFXkg8Wei4O1ms4aYEqvM=;hash|G8yYfo38EV/EwjrrudNwCg==
Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc, pp.1851-30574, 2004. ,
LUMBAR TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol.87, issue.3, pp.490-496, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-200503000-00002
Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year, J Spinal Disord Tech ,
SB Charit?? Disc Replacement, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol.16, issue.4, pp.424-457, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00016
Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up, The Spine Journal, vol.14, issue.8 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.028
Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, Feb, vol.19, issue.2, pp.290-296, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00586-009-1182-7
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899811/pdf
Comparison between total disc replacement and hybrid construct at two lumbar levels with minimum follow-up of two years, Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, vol.103, issue.1, pp.39-43, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.018
Hybrid Constructs, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol.36, issue.3, pp.379-88, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.03.002
Survivorship and clinical outcomes after multi-level anterior lumbar reconstruction with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion or hybrid construct, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol.28, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.10.033
The Concurrent Use of Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, SPINE, vol.179, issue.4210, pp.830-835, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002263
Effects of lumbar artificial disc design on intervertebral mobility: in vivo comparison between mobilecore and fixed-core. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.630-640, 2012. ,
Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00586-006-0208-7
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2200701/pdf
Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.411-432, 2011. ,
Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review, Int Orthop. 2015, vol.39, issue.1, pp.87-95 ,
An evidence-based medicine approach in determining factors that may affect outcome in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine Lumbar total disc replacement: correlation of clinical outcome and radiological parameters, Acta Neurochir, vol.33155, issue.1110, pp.1262-1271, 2008. ,
Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis, The Spine Journal, vol.11, issue.1, pp.11-20, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.026
A Comparison of Patients Who Have Undergone 1-Level Versus 2-Level Prodisc Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.38, issue.14, pp.1194-1202, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b31e8
Two-level lumbar total disc replacement: Functional outcomes and segmental motion after 4 years, Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, vol.101, issue.1, pp.17-21, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.014
URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.014
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.24, issue.3, pp.416-443, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973
URL : http://thejns.org/doi/pdf/10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973
Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion, World Journal of Orthopedics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.117-143, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.117
Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, pp.1259-66, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00402-012-1546-z
Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.7, issue.1, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3171/SPI-07/07/021
Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach, Feb, vol.1019, issue.42, pp.314-323, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s005860000239
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611507/pdf
The Difference in Superior Adjacent Segment Pathology After Lumbar Posterolateral Fusion by Using 2 Different Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques in 9-Year Minimum Follow-up, Spine, vol.39, issue.14, pp.1093-1101, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000353
Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine, pp.1701-1708, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1097/brs.0b013e31817bb956
Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review. Spine, Oct Guyer RD, vol.1537, issue.63, pp.133-143, 1922. ,
multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up, Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc, vol.9, issue.5, pp.374-86, 2009. ,
Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc, pp.1512-1521, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00586-009-1047-0
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899375/pdf
A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2. Spine, Jul, vol.1540, issue.14, pp.1132-1141, 2015. ,
Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement, The Spine Journal, vol.6, issue.3, pp.242-249, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.04.013
Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty With MAVERICK Disc Versus Stand-Alone Interbody Fusion, Spine, vol.36, issue.25, pp.1600-16112127, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318217668f
Does the type of sagittal spinal shape influence the clinical results of lumbar disc arthroplasty?, Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, vol.102, issue.6, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.012
Clinical Results of Total Lumbar Disc Replacement Regarding Various Aetiologies of the Disc Degeneration, Spine, vol.36, issue.5, pp.313-319, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dfbc4e
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.13, issue.2, p.963, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub2
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3/pdf