Bacteremia: A Comparative Review of Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins, Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, vol.4, issue.Suppl, pp.346-60, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.4103/0976-500X.120957
Treatment Outcomes with Cefazolin versus Oxacillin for Deep-Seated Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.59, issue.9, pp.5232-5240, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.04677-14
Comparative evaluation of the tolerability of cefazolin and nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-?susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in the outpatient setting. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am, pp.369-75, 2014. ,
The Safety and Economic Impact of Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections, Infectious Diseases and Therapy, vol.53, issue.8, pp.225-256 ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.00317-09
Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in a California Tertiary Medical Center, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.60, issue.8, pp.4684-4693, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.00243-16
Comparative outcomes of cefazolin versus nafcillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a prospective multicentre cohort study in Korea, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.001
Cefazolin versus anti-?staphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-?susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a narrative review Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Available from: https://www.pasteur.fr/fr/centre-?medical/fiches-?maladies/staphylocoque 11 The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection : a multinational population-?based surveillance study, Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, vol.1019, issue.5, pp.465-71, 2013. ,
Diagnosis and treatment of bacteraemia and endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. A clinical guideline from the Spanish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (SEIMC), Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, vol.33, issue.9, pp.625-626, 2015. ,
Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality, PLOS ONE, vol.3, issue.2, p.170236, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0170236.s002
Factors associated with 12??week case-fatality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a prospective cohort study, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol.22, issue.11, pp.948-949, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.034
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01417891
Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection and Endocarditis - A Prospective Cohort Study, PLOS ONE, vol.30, issue.5, p.127385, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0127385.t005
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01299980
CONCLUSIONS, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol.52, issue.12, pp.1417-1439, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1086/528716
Recommandations de pratique clinique Infections ostéo-?articulaires sur matériel (prothèse, implant, ostéosynthèse) Available from: http://www.infectiologie.com/fr/recommandations.html 18 Patients at risk of complications of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection, pp.246-53, 2009. ,
The VIRSTA score, a prediction score to estimate risk of infective endocarditis and determine priority for echocardiography in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, Journal of Infection, vol.72, issue.5, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.02.003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01309268
Impact of an Evidence-Based Bundle Intervention in the Quality-of-Care Management and Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia, Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol.57, issue.9, pp.1225-1258, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/cid/cit499
Practice guidelines for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. IDSA guidelines. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am, pp.1651-72, 2004. ,
Current status in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a practical view, pp.55-68, 2016. ,
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infective endocarditis: A cost-effective strategy, M??decine et Maladies Infectieuses, vol.44, issue.7, pp.327-357 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.05.001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01146253
Efficacy and safety of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis: a ten-year prospective study, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiolog??a Cl??nica, vol.29, issue.8 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.05.007
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: A Retrospective Study Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of methicillin-?susceptible Staphylococcus aureus : a comparison of cefazolin and ceftriaxone, Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol J Can Mal Infect Microbiol Medicale. Infection, vol.201641, issue.4, pp.769-74, 2013. ,
Are all beta-lactams similarly effective in the treatment of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia?, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol.17, issue.10, pp.1581-1587, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03425.x
Is Cefazolin Inferior to Nafcillin for Treatment of Methicillin-?Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia? Antimicrob Agents Chemother, pp.5122-5128, 2011. ,
Comparison of Cefazolin versus Oxacillin for Treatment of Complicated Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.58, issue.9, pp.5117-5141, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.02800-14
Comparative effectiveness of cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for MSSA bacteraemia: results from a large multicentre cohort study, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol.70, issue.5, pp.1539-1585 ,
DOI : 10.1093/jac/dku560
Inoculum Effect with Cefazolin among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Frequency and Possible Cause of Cefazolin Treatment Failure, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.53, issue.8, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.00317-09
Characterization of four beta-lactamases produced by Staphylococcus aureus., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.36, issue.2, pp.440-445, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.36.2.440
Cefazolin high-inoculum effect in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from South American hospitals, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol.68, issue.12, pp.2773-2781, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jac/dkt254
Bacteremia, Microbial Drug Resistance, vol.20, issue.6, pp.568-74, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1089/mdr.2013.0229
Characteristics of cefazolin inoculum effect-?positive methicillin-?susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection in a multicentre bacteraemia cohort, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2017. ,
Available from, 2017. ,
Einflu?? parenteraler Cephalosporine auf die gastrointestinale Mikroflora: Untersuchungen bei gesunden Freiwilligen und hospitalisierten Patienten, Infection, vol.14, issue.Suppl. B, pp.129-162, 1985. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01644233
Changes in the Intestinal Flora After the Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics to Patients Undergoing a Gastrectomy, Surgery Today, vol.32, issue.7, pp.581-587, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s005950200105
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in minor and major surgery, Minerva Anestesiol. 2015, vol.81, issue.1, pp.76-91 ,
Antibiotic prophylaxis in craniotomy: a review Efficacy of ultra-? short single agent regimen antibiotic chemo-?prophylaxis in reducing the risk of meningitis in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery, Neurosurg Rev. 2014 Clin Neurol Neurosurg, vol.37, issue.3, pp.407-421, 2015. ,
Antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie cardiaque : c??fazoline ?? 12 hversus c??fazoline ?? 36 h, Annales Fran??aises d'Anesth??sie et de R??animation, vol.6, issue.2, pp.83-90, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0750-7658(87)80108-9
Prophylaxis in cardiac surgery. A controlled randomized comparison between cefazolin and cefuroxime, Eur J Cardio-? Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-?Thorac Surg, vol.9, issue.6, pp.325-334, 1995. ,
Pharmacokinetic characteristics and microbiologic appropriateness of cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cardiac surgery, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol.152, issue.2, pp.603-613, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.024
Antibiotic prophylaxis in non-cardiac thoracic surgery: Cefazolin versus placebo, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.5, issue.10, pp.515-523, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1016/1010-7940(91)90103-Q
[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in heart and vascular surgery. A prospective randomized comparative study with cefazolin and ceftriaxone ,
Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Teicoplanin and Cefazolin as Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prosthetic Vascular Surgery, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infections Diseases, vol.18, issue.3, pp.175-183, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s100960050253
Prophylactic cefazolin in gastric bypass surgery, Surgery, vol.90, issue.2, pp.426-458, 1981. ,
Comparison of the effects of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and cost-?effectiveness between cefazolin (CEZ) and ,
SBT/ABPC) in gastric cancer surgery employing clinical pathway]. Yakugaku Zasshi, pp.815-839, 2004. ,
The effects of cefazolin on cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage after endoscopic interventions, Surgical Endoscopy, vol.21, issue.9, pp.2911-2919, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.883
SURGERY: a continuous infusion of cefazolin versus ampicillin/sulbactam and ertapenem, Arq Gastroenterol. 2015, vol.52, issue.2, pp.83-90 ,
Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications in cesarean section-?-?prospective study], Ceska Gynekol, vol.64, issue.5, pp.313-319, 1999. ,
Influence of pregnancy on ceftriaxone, cefazolin and gentamicin pharmacokinetics in caesarean vs. non-pregnant sectioned women, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol.51, issue.14, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.33.6.797
Preoperative administration of cephalosporins for elective caesarean delivery. Srp Arh Celok Lek, pp.9-10600, 2010. ,
Comparison of single versus multiple doses of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing post-elective Caesarean section infectious morbidity, Kathmandu University Medical Journal, vol.8, issue.2, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3554
Tinidazole versus cefazolin in antibiotic prophylaxis of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy]. Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstet Rev Fed Bras Soc Ginecol E Obstet, pp.544-553, 2008. ,
A randomized controlled trial comparing ceftriaxone with cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal hysterectomy, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.87, issue.(1), pp.11-14, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0025-7125(02)00145-1
diagnostic et prise en charge de l'infection dans le mois suivant l'implantation [Internet] Available from: https://www.has-?sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_1228574/fr/prothese-?de-?hanche-?ou-?de-?genou-?diagnostic-? et-?prise-?en-?charge-?de-?l-?infection-?dans-?le-?mois-?suivant-?l-?implantation 65. Société de Pathologie infectieuse de Langue Française. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Spondylodiscites infectieuses primitives, et secondaires à un geste intra-?discal, sans mise en pace de matériel, 2007. ,
Comparison of Cefazolin versus Oxacillin for Treatment of Complicated Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol.58, issue.9, pp.5117-5141, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1128/AAC.02800-14
Clinical Presentation, Etiology, and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis in the 21st Century, Archives of Internal Medicine, vol.169, issue.5, pp.463-73, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.603
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00464774