Comparaison ventouse forceps, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.8, pp.231-243, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74761-6
La sant?? p??rinatale en France m??tropolitaine de 1995???? 2010. R??sultats des enqu??tes nationales p??rinatales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.2, pp.151-166, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.008
Enquête nationale périnatale 2010 Les naissances en 2010 et leur évolution depuis, Paris: Inserm, 2003. ,
Donn??es 2007??de l???extraction instrumentale en France??: r??sultats d???une enqu??te nationale aupr??s de l???ensemble des centres hospitalo-universitaires, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.39, issue.2, pp.121-132, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.01.002
Ventouse Kiwi?? versus forceps et spatules??: ??valuation de la morbidit?? maternelle et f??tale. ?? propos de 169??cas, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.38, issue.11, pp.653-659, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.009
Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.197, issue.3, pp.1-5, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051
Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.41, issue.7, pp.642-648, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08412.x
Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.000224, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.cd000224
Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial Injury, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.341, issue.23, pp.1709-1714, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301
Complications maternelles des extractions instrumentales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.8, pp.244-259, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74762-8
Complications n??onatales des extractions instrumentales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.8, pp.260-268, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74763-X
C??sarienne pour ??chec d'extraction par ventouse obst??tricale??: facteurs de risque et cons??quences maternelles et n??onatales, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.32, issue.7-8, pp.607-612, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.04.003
??checs d???extraction par ventouse obst??tricale??: facteurs de risque, cons??quences maternelles et f??tales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.42, issue.7, pp.693-702, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.04.003
Risk factors for failed vacuum extraction and associated complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.30, issue.308, pp.1646-1651, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be
Predictors for failure of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.200, pp.29-34, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.008
Ut??rus cicatriciel??: aspects ??pid??miologiques, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.697-707, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022
Failed trial of vacuum or forceps???Maternal and fetal outcome, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.176, issue.1, pp.200-204, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1
What to do after a failed attempt of vacuum delivery?, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.107, issue.2, pp.151-155, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00344-5
Neonatal Outcome Following Failed Kiwi OmniCup Vacuum Extraction, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol.34, issue.7, pp.620-625, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35313-0
Factors contributing to failure of vacuum delivery and associated maternal/neonatal morbidity, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.107, issue.2, pp.157-160, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00344-5
Failed Vacuum Extraction: Maternal Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcome, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.57, issue.3, pp.819-824, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00006254-200203000-00009
What happens when vacuum extraction fails?, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.19, issue.2, pp.243-248, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.78
Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.000446, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00064.x
A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.96, issue.3, pp.1510-1515, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3
A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.68, issue.1, pp.183-189, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1132
Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: Comparison of forceps versus cesarean section, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.45, issue.7, pp.541-545, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.5271/sjweh.555
A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.156, issue.1, pp.41-45, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.01.004
Facteurs de risque et morbidit?? maternelle et n??onatale des ??checs d???extraction instrumentale par forceps, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.4, pp.333-338, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.001
Ventouses : description, m??canique, indications et contre-indications, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.8, pp.210-221, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74759-8
The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.185, issue.4, pp.896-902, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1067/mob.2001.117309
Performance de l???estimation ??chographique du poids f??tal r??alis??e par les internes de sp??cialit?? le jour de l???accouchement, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.44, issue.7, pp.632-638, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.10.015
Performance de l?????chographie dans l???estimation du poids f??tal ?? terme, Gyn??cologie Obst??trique & Fertilit??, vol.44, issue.7-8, pp.391-395, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.005
Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: Comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.123, issue.2, pp.193-197, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009
Diagnostic ??chographique d???engagement de la pr??sentation f??tale. ?? propos d???une s??rie prospective pr??liminaire fran??aise, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.38, issue.6, pp.474-480, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.04.001
Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol.210, issue.18, pp.1886-1891, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.002
Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.191, issue.3, pp.896-902, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.073