89 cas nécessitant modification du plan de traitement, p.90 ,
103 a. Limitations de l'étude 103 b. Puissance taille et représentativité de l'échantillon 104 c. Profil type des praticiens de la région PACA et confrontation des résultats avec la littérature, 106 e. Désir de devenir Invisalign® provider, p.109 ,
Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances, 2008. ,
Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.133, issue.2, pp.218-245, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.043
Interproximal reduction of teeth:Differences in perspective between orthodontists and general dentists, Angle Orthod, vol.2014, pp.1-6 ,
Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods, Angle Orthod, vol.72, pp.481-94, 2002. ,
Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.124, issue.5, pp.502-510, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8
Surgical-orthodontic treatment of two skeletal Class III patients with Invisalign® and fixed appliances, J Clin Orthod JCO, vol.39, issue.4, pp.245-58, 2005. ,
Paris :quintescence international, 2009. ,
The Clear Plastic Appliance, The Angle Orthodontist, vol.78, issue.2, pp.381-383, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0381:TCPA]2.0.CO;2
Root Resorption Following Treatment with Aligners. The Angle orthodontist, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.2319/112807-562.1
URL : http://www.angle.org/doi/pdf/10.2319/112807-562.1
Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces, The Angle Orthodontist, vol.84, issue.3, pp.391-396, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.2319/062113-466
Assessment of pain experience in adults and children after bracket bonding and initial archwire insertion, Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol.21, issue.2, pp.32-37, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance, Progress in Orthodontics, vol.129, issue.1, p.49, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.003
Upper-incisor root control with Invisalign® appliances, J Clin Orthod. 2013, vol.47, issue.6, pp.346-51 ,
Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.124, issue.5, pp.502-510, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00577-8
Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.128, issue.3, pp.292-300, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002
Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol.26, issue.1, pp.79-85, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejo/26.1.79
The duration of orthodontic treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.102, issue.1, pp.45-51, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70013-Z
Invisalign® treatment of dental class II malocclusions without auxiliaries, J Clin Orthod, vol.44, pp.665-72, 2010. ,
Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade, Progress in Orthodontics, vol.13, issue.2, pp.173-84, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.pio.2011.10.002
Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II Non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study, Progress in Orthodontics, vol.13, issue.1, pp.30-41, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.pio.2011.07.002
Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.130, issue.4 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.031
Orthodontics current principles and techniques [Internet], 2014. ,
Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: A meta-analysis, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.143, issue.5, pp.602-617, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.024
Class II correction with the Invisalign® system, J Clin Orthod, vol.44, pp.28-35, 2010. ,
Adult patients' adjustability to orthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between Labial, Lingual, and Invisalign??, The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol.32, issue.4, pp.724-730, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejo/cjp117
Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique ??? regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization, BMC Oral Health, vol.128, issue.1, p.68, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002
Forces and moments generated by removable thermoplastic aligners: Incisor torque, premolar derotation, and molar distalization, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.145, issue.6 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.015
E How effective is the Invisalign® system in expansion movement with Ex30? aligners?Clinical Oral Investigations, pp.1475-1484, 2017. ,
Appliance wear: the patient's point of view, The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol.19, issue.4, pp.377-382, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ejo/19.4.377
How accurate is Invisalign®? Are predicted tooth positions achieved?. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, 2017. ,
Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment, The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol.31, issue.7, pp.380-384, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90119-F
Comparative Use of Invisalign?? by Orthodontists and General Practitioners, The Angle Orthodontist, vol.80, issue.3, pp.425-434, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.2319/052309-292.1
The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: A pilot study of five selected practices, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.97, issue.1, pp.45-51, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81708-1
Clinical evolution of the Invisalign® appliance, J Calif Dent Assoc, vol.30, issue.10, pp.769-76, 2002. ,
Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.138, issue.6, pp.698-691, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012
Surgical-orthodontic treatment using the Invisalign®system, J Clin Orthod JCO, vol.42, issue.4, pp.237-282, 2008. ,
Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol.133, issue.4, pp.68-78, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.025