Présentation des systèmes actuels de C.F.A.O dentaire. Etude détaillée du Pro 50. Th. d'exercice : Odontologie, 2004. ,
Conception Assistée par Ordinateur et Fabrication Assistée par Ordinateur en dentisterie -? Utilisation du CEREC 3D en pratique quotidienne, Th. d'exercice : Odontologie : Bordeaux : Univ. Victor Segalen Bordeaux, 2006. ,
Apport de la conception assistée par ordinateur, en pratique quotidienne, dans l'étude pré-?prothétique des cas de prothèse fixe plurale dento-?portée Th, p.2013 ,
O appliquée à l'odontologie restauratrice et à la prothèse, Réal. Clin, vol.20, issue.4, pp.215-232, 2009. ,
Pratique de l'empreinte en prothèse fixée : Du pilier naturel à l'implant, des techniques classiques à, 2012. ,
Les clés du succès en implantologie, CdP, 2009. ,
Empreintes optiques et perspectives d'avenir Strat. Proth Gingival recession around implants: a 1-?year longitudinal prospective study, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Impants, vol.1015, issue.44, pp.239-286, 2000. ,
Accuracy of implant impression, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.11, issue.2, pp.216-238, 1996. ,
An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2004. ,
Intérêt de l'empreinte mixte plâtre-?polyéthers avec un montage directeur polymérisé en implantologie, Alternatives, vol.33, pp.3-14, 2007. ,
Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review, Journal of Prosthodontics, vol.139, issue.12, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258
Place de la C.F.A.O directe en omni pratique Quadrant, Couronnes, Facette, Réal. Clin, vol.20, issue.4, pp.231-273, 2009. ,
Variability of closing movements, dynamic occlusion, and occlusal contact patterns during mastication, Int. J. of Comp. Dent, vol.14, issue.2, pp.119-146, 2011. ,
Les matériaux à empreinte. Société Francophone des Biomatériaux Dentaires -? Support de cours, p.31 ,
Accuracy of digital and conventionnal impression techniques and workflow Apport du système Straumann Cares en prothèse fixée dento-?supportée The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: Room for improvement, Inf. Dent. Inf. Dent. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013 Inf. Dent, vol.961796136, issue.207293, pp.30-35, 2005. ,
Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? JADA, pp.761-764, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258
Utilization of Digital Technologies for Fabrication of Definitive Implant-Supported Restorations, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol.31, issue.5, pp.299-308, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
Empreinte optique : la clé du succès, pp.10-12, 2013. ,
Influence of scanning strategies on the accurancy of digital intraoral scanning systems, Int. J. Comp. Dent, vol.16, issue.1, pp.11-21, 2013. ,
The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-? the comparaison of two systems A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-?supported restoration, MOUSSALY C. La C.F.A.O directe au service de l'esthétique Inf. dent, pp.2119-2144, 2006. ,
Contact : Dr. Volker Winter 38 -? 3SHAPE?, site internet, http://www.3shapedental.com/?lang=fr, page consultée en Septembre, p.2014, 2014. ,
Edition, CAD/CAM customized abutments with Straumann original implant connections now available to 3SHAPE? Dental System users, May:7 Page Industry, pp.107-125, 2013. ,
La chaîne numérique 3SHAPE? : de l'empreinte optique à l'usinage ,
Site disponible sur : www.digital-?dental-?cadcam-?C ,
Comparison of the Accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol.28, issue.1, pp.228-268, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.11607/jomi.2546
Le système TRIOS de 3SHAPE? de l'empreinte optique à la réalisation prothétique Digital vs conventional implant impressions : efficiency outcomes, Inf. Dent. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res, vol.9624, issue.291, pp.18-25, 2013. ,
O directe et séance unique en pratique quotidienne, Inf. Dent, vol.96, issue.20, pp.65-71, 2014. ,
Impressions are changing : deciding on conventional, digital or digital Plus In-?Office Milling, Inf. Dent. JADA, vol.96140, issue.2910, pp.68-72, 2009. ,
The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.109, issue.3, pp.187-91, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60041-4
CAD/CAM Technology for Implant Abutments, Crowns, and Superstructures, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol.29, issue.Supplement, pp.117-153, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.3
URL : http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/submission.pdf
Rationale for the Use of CAD/CAM Technology in Implant Prosthodontics, International Journal of Dentistry, vol.14, issue.2, p.768121, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02125.x
Fit of screw-?retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods : a systematic review, Int. J. Prosthodont, vol.24, issue.3, pp.207-227, 2011. ,
CAM in prosthodontics ? a futuristic overview The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments, Ann. Dent. Spe. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res, vol.214, issue.1 1, pp.14-19, 2011. ,
The time efficiency of intraoral scanners. An in vitro comparative study, pp.542-51, 2014. ,
CAD/CAM Implant Abutments Using Coded Healing Abutments: A Detailed Description of the Restorative Process, Compend Contin Educ Dent, vol.34, issue.8, pp.612-617, 2013. ,
Virtual-Designed and Computer-Milled Implant Abutments, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol.63, issue.9, pp.22-32, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.158
The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-?span implant-?supported prostheses Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions, J. Prothest. Dent. J. Prosthet. Dent. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Jul-? Aug Int. J. Prosthodont. Clin. Oral Implants Res, vol.1091002927, issue.3445, pp.187-91, 2008. ,
Use of digital data acquisition and CAD/CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.111, issue.1, pp.1-5, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.010
Peri-Implantitis Associated with Type of Cement: A Retrospective Analysis of Different Types of Cement and Their Clinical Correlation to the Peri-Implant Tissue, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol.26, issue.Suppl 6, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.11607/ijp.2572
Comparison of the Accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol.28, issue.1, pp.228-268, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.11607/jomi.2546
Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol.29, issue.4, pp.853-62, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.11607/jomi.3343
Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology for Implants Considering Operator Experience ,
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.110, issue.2, pp.90-100, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7
An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.110, issue.5, p.2013 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.012
Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration, Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent, vol.110, issue.5, pp.420-423, 1997. ,
Intraoral digital impressions to enhance implant esthetics, pp.584-91 ,
Digital implant impressions with the ???Individualized Scanbody Technique??? for emergence profile support, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.24, issue.Suppl. 2, pp.395-402, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0357
Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES), Head & Face Medicine, vol.3, issue.Suppl, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x
In vitro study on passive fit in implant-?supported 5-?unit fixed partial dentures, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2004. ,
Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.90, issue.5, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.021
Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes, BMC Oral Health, vol.9014, issue.5, pp.434-474, 2014. ,
The digitalizing of implant dentistry: a clinical evaluation of 15 patients, Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent, vol.34, issue.3, pp.192-198, 2013. ,
Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol.109, issue.2, pp.121-129, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques, Quintessence Int. Feb, vol.43, issue.2, pp.119-144, 2012. ,
Je promets et je jure D'être fidèle aux lois de l'honneur et de la probité Dans l'exercice de l'art dentaire Je donnerai mes soins gratuits à l'indigent Et n'exigerai jamais un honoraire au dessus de mon travail. Ma langue taira les secrets qui me seront confiés. Admis à l'intérieur des maisons, Mes yeux ne verront pas ce qui se passe, Mes connaissances et mon état Ne serviront ni à diffuser des propos non avérés, Ni à corrompre les moeurs, ni à favoriser le crime ,
Signature : Vu, la Directrice de l'UFR des Sciences Odontologiques ,