. Dietschi+d and . +spreafico+r, +Evidence*based.concepts.and.procedures.for.bonded.inlays.and onlays..Part.I..Historical

P. +. Magne+ and U. , Bonded. porcelain. restorations. in. the. anterior. dentition. :. a biomimetic.apporach, 2003.

+. Dietschi+d, Current.clinical.concepts.for.adhesive.cementation.of.tooths olored.posterior.restorations..Pract, periodontics.aesthet.Dent, vol.10, issue.56, pp.47-54, 1998.

R. Frankenberger+, Effect. of. proximal. box. elevation. with. resin. composite. on marginal.quality.of.ceramic.inlays.in.vitro, Clin.Oral.Investig, issue.1, p.17, 2013.

M. Zaruba+, T. Göhring+, F. Wegehaupt+, T. Et+-attin+, and . Influence, of. a. proximal. margin elevation.technique.on.marginal.adaptation.of.ceramic.inlays, Acta.Odontol.Scand, issue.2, pp.71317-324, 2013.

. Zaruba+m, Marginal.adaptation.of.ceramic.and.composite inlays.in.minimally.invasive.mod.cavities, Clin.Oral.Investig, issue.2, p.18, 2014.

P. Ausiello, S. Rengo, C. Davidson, and D. Watts, Stress.distributions.in.adhesively cemented. ceramic. and. resins composite. Class. II. inlay. restorations:. a. 3Ds FEA. study, DentMater, vol.20, issue.9, pp.862-72, 2004.

M. Roggendorf+, N. Krämer+, and C. Dippold+, Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro, Journal of Dentistry, vol.40, issue.12, p.40, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.019

. Dietschi+d, In.vitro.evaluation.of.marginal.and.internal adaptation. after. occlusal. stressing. of. indirect. class. II. composite. restorations. with different.resinous.bases, Eur.J.Oral.Sci, vol.111, 2003.

. Dietschi+d and . +spreafico+r, +Evidences based.concepts.and.procedures.for.bonded.inlays.and onlays..Part.I..Historical.perspectives.and.clinical.rationale.for.a.biosubstitutive.approach, Int.J.Esthet.Dent,.2015, issue.10, pp.210-227

I. Mjör%, J. Moorhead%, and J. Dahl%, Reasons. for. replacement. of. restorations. in. permanent teeth.in.general, dental.practice..Int$Dent$J$, vol.50, 2000.

Y. Bagis+, I. Baltacioglu+, +. Kahyaogullari+, and S. , Comparing. microleakage. and. the. layering methods. of. siloranes based. resin. composite. in. wide, Class. II. MOD. cavities.. Oper. Dent, vol.34, 2009.

C. Poggio+, C. Arciola+, F. Rosti+, A. Scribante+, E. Saino+ et al., Adhesion. of. Streptococcus mutans.to.different.restorative.materials, Int.J.Artif.Organs, vol.32, 2009.

D. Lefever+, L. Gregor+, T. Bortolotto+, +. , and I. , Supragingival. relocation. of. subgengivally located. margins. for. adhesive. inlays/onlays. with. diffrent. materials, J. Adhes. dent, vol.14, 2012.

. Dietschi+d, internal adaptation. after. occlusal. stressing. of. indirect. class. II. composite. restorations. with different.resinous.bases.and.interface.treatments, In.vitro.evaluation.of.marginal.and.Eur.J.Oral.Sci, issue.1111, 2003.

G. Rocca+, L. Gregor+, M. Sandoval+, I. Krejci+, +. Dietschi+ et al., In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. ???Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations???, Clinical Oral Investigations, vol.44, issue.5, pp.1385-93, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00080-1

. Martins+tm1+bosco+af, Periodontal.tissue response.to.coverage.of.root.cavities.restored.with.resin.materials:.a.histomorphometric study.in.dogs, J.Periodontol, issue.6, pp.781075-82, 2007.

M. Santamaria+, Connective. tissue. graft. and. resin. glass. ionomer. for. the. treatment gingival.recession.associated.with.noncarious.cerviacl.lesions.:.a.case.series, Jperiodontics. Restorative.Dent, p.31, 2011.

V. Santos+, J. Lucchesi+, S. Cortelli+, and . Effects, a. 6s month.evaluation, J.Periodontol, issue.8, p.78, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01226433

M. Santamaria+, Resin. composite. plus. connective. tissue. graft. to. treat. single maxillary. gingival. recession. associated. with. nons carious. cervical. lesion. :. randomized clinical.trial, J.Clin.Periodontol, issue.5, pp.43461-468, 2016.

L. Padbury+a, Interactions.between.the.gingiva.and.the.margin.of restorations, J.Clin.Periodontol, issue.5, p.30, 2003.

+. Stetler+kj, Signifiance.of.the.width.of.keratinized.gingiva.on.the.periodontal status.of.teeth.with.submarginal.restorations, J.Periodontol, issue.10, pp.58696-700

M. Veneziani+, Adhesive. restorations. in. the. posterior. area. with. subgingival. cervical margins:. new. classification. and. differentiated. treatment. approach, Eur. J. Esthet. Dent, issue.51, pp.50-76, 2010.

. Magne+p, IDS.a.fundamental.procedure.for.indirect.bonded.restorations, J.Esthet.Restor Dent, vol.17, issue.3, 2005.

A. Garguilio+, dimensions. and. relations. of. dentogingival. junction. in. humans, J periodontol, vol.32, 1961.

A. Padbury, . Jr, R. Eber, and H. Wang, Interactions.between.the.gingiva.and.the.margin.of restorations, J.Clinic.Periodontol, vol.30, 2003.

S. Dibart+ and +. , Crown. lengthening. in. mandibular. molars:. a. 5s year. retrospective radiographic.analysis, J.Periodontol, issue.6, p.74, 2003.

M. Veneziani+, Adhesive. restorations. in. the. posterior. area. with. subgingival. cervical margins.:.New.classification.and.differentiated.treatment.approach, Eur J Esthet Dent