Coordination nationale des Enquêtes Nationales Périnatales ,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). avr, vol.41, issue.2, pp.151-66, 2012.
Breech presentation, Br Med J, vol.2, pp.547-555, 1931. ,
Reduction of perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech delivery through routine use of cesarean section, Obstet Gynecol. déc, vol.14, pp.758-63, 1959. ,
Considerations on breech presentation as an indication for caesarean section ,
, Dan Med Bull. juill, vol.7, pp.117-137, 1960.
,
, Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. févr, vol.179, issue.1, pp.1-16, 1975.
Vaginal delivery of the term breech. A preliminary report, Obstet Gynecol. mars, vol.53, issue.3, pp.341-344, 1979. ,
Singleton breech presentation in labor: experience in, 1980. ,
, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1 août, vol.143, issue.7, pp.733-742, 1982.
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group, Lancet, vol.356, issue.9239, pp.1375-83, 2000. ,
Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972-2003, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. mai, vol.132, issue.1, pp.20-26, 2007. ,
The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. avril, vol.125, issue.2, pp.176-84, 2006. ,
Recent trends in breech delivery in the Netherlands, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.110, issue.10, pp.948-51, 2003. ,
Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. sept, vol.93, issue.9, pp.888-96, 2014. ,
The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. févr, vol.112, issue.2, pp.205-214, 2005. ,
Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. juin, vol.84, issue.6, pp.584-591, 2005. ,
Changes in vaginal breech delivery rates in a single large metropolitan area, Am J Obstet Gynecol. juin, vol.206, issue.6, pp.498-499, 2012. ,
Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.49, issue.5, pp.456-60, 1991. ,
Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial, 18. van Roosmalen J, Meguid T. The dilemma of vaginal breech delivery worldwide, vol.194, pp.20-25, 2006. ,
, Lancet Lond Engl. 31 mai, vol.383, issue.9932, pp.1863-1867, 2014.
Hannah's term breech trial: For whom the bell tolls? ,
, Gynecol Obstet Fertil. sept, vol.34, issue.9, pp.677-685, 2006.
Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium, Am J Obstet Gynecol. avr, vol.194, issue.4, pp.1002-1013, 2006. ,
The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. janv, vol.123, issue.1, pp.49-57, 2016. ,
Elective cesarean delivery for term breech, Obstet Gynecol. avr, vol.101, issue.4, pp.690-696, 2003. ,
Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study, Obstet Gynecol, vol.102, issue.5, pp.911-918, 2003. ,
Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. août, vol.80, issue.8, pp.731-738, 2001. ,
Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option, Obstet Gynecol. mars, vol.103, issue.3, pp.407-419, 2004. ,
Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. juin, vol.84, issue.6, pp.578-83, 2005. ,
Assisted vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in breech presentation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. juin, vol.84, issue.6, pp.588-92, 2005. ,
Selective vaginal breech delivery at term-still an option, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.91, issue.10, pp.1177-83, 2012. ,
,
, ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). avr, vol.30, issue.2, pp.235-242, 2001.
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation, J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. juin, vol.31, issue.6, pp.567-78, 2009. ,
, RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The Management of Breech Presentation, 2006.
Evaluation of a decision protocol for type of delivery of infants in breech presentation at term, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.158, issue.2, pp.194-202, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02008099
Influence of mode of delivery in term breech presentation on the Apgar score and transfer in neonatal care unit. Results of the management of 568 singleton pregnancies in a level ,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). avr, vol.37, issue.2, pp.149-53, 2008.
Development and validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill tool for the practice of breech presentation delivery, Arch Gynecol Obstet. août, vol.294, issue.2, pp.327-359, 2016. ,
Planned vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: prenatal determinants predictive of elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. mai, vol.138, issue.1, pp.14-22, 2008. ,
Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol. sept, vol.191, issue.3, pp.864-71, 2004. ,
Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery, BMJ, vol.329, issue.7473, pp.1039-1081, 2004. ,
The term breech trial ten years on: primum non nocere?, Birth Berkeley Calif. mars, vol.39, issue.1, pp.3-9, 2012. ,
, Term breech delivery in Sweden: mortality relative to fetal presentation and planned mode of delivery, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. juin, vol.84, issue.6, pp.593-601, 2005.
Consequences of the Term Breech Trial in Denmark, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. juill, vol.90, issue.7, pp.767-71, 2011. ,
Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study, BMJ, vol.17, issue.7628, p.1025, 2007. ,
Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high?, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. févr, vol.83, issue.2, pp.180-186, 2004. ,
Lessons to be learnt in managing the breech presentation at term: an 11-year single-centre retrospective study, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. août, vol.54, issue.4, pp.333-342, 2014. ,
Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors, Obstet Gynecol. juin, vol.63, issue.6, pp.792-797, 1984. ,
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Semin Perinatol, vol.30, pp.276-87, 2006. ,
Epidemiologic aspects of shoulder dystocia-related neurological birth injuries, Arch Gynecol Obstet. avr, vol.291, issue.4, pp.769-77, 2015. ,
Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America, Lancet Lond Engl. 3 juin, vol.367, issue.9525, pp.1819-1848, 2006. ,
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term, CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 13 févr, vol.176, issue.4, pp.455-60, 2007. ,
Maternal Mortality Committee Of The Netherlands Society Of Obstetrics. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.86, issue.2, pp.240-243, 2007. ,
Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol. mai, vol.103, issue.5, pp.907-919, 2004. ,
Short and long-term outcomes after cesarean section, Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol, vol.6, issue.2, pp.205-220, 2011. ,
Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol. sept, vol.191, issue.3, pp.917-944, 2004. ,
764: Effect of increased caesarean section rate due to term breech presentation on maternal and fetal outcome in subsequent pregnancies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.208, issue.1, p.321 ,
Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems, Am J Obstet Gynecol. mai, vol.174, issue.5, pp.1569-74, 1996. ,
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med. 16 déc, vol.351, issue.25, pp.2581-2590, 2004. ,
United Nations Population Fund. Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services, 1997. ,
Euro-Peristat project, SCPE and Eurocat. European Perinatal health report. The health of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010, European Perinatal Health Report, vol.59, 2008. ,
Increase in cesarean delivery: are we facing a pandemic?, Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. déc, vol.107, issue.3, pp.183-187, 2009. ,
Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), vol.210, pp.179-93, 2014. ,
,
, Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. avr, vol.122, issue.5, pp.690-699, 2015.
,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). juin, vol.45, issue.6, pp.641-51, 2016.
,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.42, issue.7, pp.685-92, 2013.
Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.98, issue.2, pp.186-92, 2001. ,
Obstetric trainees' experience in vaginal breech delivery: implications for future practice, Obstet Gynecol, vol.110, issue.4, pp.900-903, 2007. ,
Breech delivery before and after the term breech trial, Clin Obstet Gynecol. mars, vol.49, issue.1, pp.198-210, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.grf.0000197545.64937.40
,
, Gynecol Obstet Fertil. sept, vol.35, issue.9, pp.747-50, 2007.
,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.20, issue.5, pp.737-781, 1991.
,
, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). févr, vol.42, issue.1, pp.71-76, 2013.