T. J. Matthews and B. E. Hamilton, Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life, NCHS Data Brief, issue.21, pp.1-8, 2009.

R. Cabry, P. Merviel, A. Hazout, S. Belloc, A. Dalleac et al., Management of infertility in women over 40, Maturitas, vol.78, issue.1, pp.17-21, 2014.

A. P. Ferraretti, A. L. Marca, B. Fauser, B. Tarlatzis, G. Nargund et al., ESHRE consensus on the definition of "poor response" to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria, Hum Reprod, vol.26, issue.7, pp.1616-1640, 2011.

A. P. Ferraretti and L. Gianaroli, The Bologna criteria for the definition of poor ovarian responders: is there a need for revision? Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.29, pp.1842-1847, 2014.

P. Humaidan, C. Alviggi, R. Fischer, and S. C. Esteves, The novel POSEIDON stratification of "Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology" and its proposed marker of successful outcome, vol.5, p.2911, 2016.

A. L. Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi et al., AntiMüllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART), vol.16, pp.113-143, 2010.

S. Luo, G. A. Kleemann, J. M. Ashraf, W. M. Shaw, and C. T. Murphy, TGF-? and insulin signaling regulate reproductive aging via oocyte and germline quality maintenance, Cell, vol.143, issue.2, pp.299-312, 2010.

S. S. Malchau, A. A. Henningsen, A. Loft, S. Rasmussen, J. Forman et al., The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.32, issue.7, pp.1439-1488, 201701.

L. Marca, A. Grisendi, V. Giulini, S. Sighinolfi, G. Tirelli et al., Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.32, issue.6, pp.931-938, 2015.

A. Roustan, J. Perrin, M. Debals-gonthier, O. Paulmyer-lacroix, A. Agostini et al., Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.30, issue.4, pp.840-847, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01444860

L. Rolland, J. Perrin, V. Villes, V. Pellegrin, L. Boubli et al., IVF oocyte retrieval: prospective evaluation of the type of anesthesia on live birth rate, pain, and patient satisfaction, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.34, issue.11, pp.1523-1531, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01681613

M. Van-der-linden, K. Buckingham, C. Farquhar, J. Kremer, and M. Metwally, Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.9154, 2015.

. Embryology, The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting, 2018.

A. Gougeon, Ovarian follicular growth in humans: ovarian ageing and population of growing follicles, Maturitas, vol.30, issue.2, pp.137-179, 1998.

F. J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D. J. Hendriks, B. W. Mol, and C. B. Lambalk, A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome, Hum Reprod Update, vol.12, issue.6, pp.685-718, 2006.

M. Mcilveen, J. D. Skull, and W. L. Ledger, Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a highrisk IVF population, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.22, issue.3, pp.778-85, 2007.

A. G. Zebitay, O. Cetin, F. F. Verit, S. Keskin, M. N. Sakar et al., The role of ovarian reserve markers in prediction of clinical pregnancy, J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol, vol.37, issue.4, pp.492-499, 2017.

H. M. Kamel, A. Amin, and A. Ar, Basal serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a promising test in prediction of occurrence of pregnancy rate in infertile women undergoing ICSI cycles, Clin Lab, vol.60, issue.10, pp.1717-1740, 2014.

H. Celik, D. B?ld?rc?n, D. Güven, M. B. Cetinkaya, T. Alper et al., Random antiMüllerian hormone predicts ovarian response in women with high baseline folliclestimulating hormone levels : anti-Müllerian hormone in poor responders in assisted reproductive treatment, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.29, issue.8, pp.797-802, 2012.

S. L. Broer, B. Mol, D. Hendriks, and F. Broekmans, The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count, Fertil Steril, vol.91, issue.3, pp.705-719, 2009.

R. Lee, F. Wu, M. Lin, S. Lin, and Y. Hwu, The predictability of serum antiMüllerian level in IVF/ICSI outcomes for patients of advanced reproductive age, Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE, vol.9, p.115, 2011.

A. Al-ghamdi, S. Coskun, S. Al-hassan, A. , R. Awartani et al., The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome, Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE, vol.6, p.37, 2008.

R. Yoeli, J. Ashkenazi, R. Orvieto, M. Shelef, and B. Kaplan, Bar-Hava I. Significance of increased endometrial thickness in assisted reproduction technology treatments, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.21, issue.8, pp.285-294, 2004.

C. Dietterich, J. H. Check, J. K. Choe, A. Nazari, and D. Lurie, Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, Fertil Steril, vol.77, issue.4, pp.781-787, 2002.

A. Kasius, J. G. Smit, H. L. Torrance, M. Eijkemans, B. W. Mol et al., Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod Update, vol.20, pp.530-571, 2014.

P. Kovacs, S. Matyas, K. Boda, and S. G. Kaali, The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.18, issue.11, pp.2337-2378, 2003.

M. Momeni, M. H. Rahbar, and E. Kovanci, A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles, J Hum Reprod Sci, vol.4, issue.3, pp.130-137, 2011.

M. L. Traub, A. Van-arsdale, L. Pal, S. Jindal, and N. Santoro, Endometrial thickness, Caucasian ethnicity, and age predict clinical pregnancy following fresh blastocyst embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort, Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE, vol.7, p.33, 2009.

M. A. Barker, L. M. Boehnlein, P. Kovacs, and S. R. Lindheim, Follicular and luteal phase endometrial thickness and echogenic pattern and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.26, issue.5, pp.243-252, 2009.

B. H. Rashidi, M. Sadeghi, M. Jafarabadi, T. Nejad, and E. S. , Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.120, issue.2, pp.179-84, 2005.

I. González-foruria, J. Peñarrubia, A. Borràs, D. Manau, G. Casals et al., Age, independent from ovarian reserve status, is the main prognostic factor in natural cycle in vitro fertilization, Fertil Steril, vol.106, issue.2, pp.342-349, 2016.

J. Chai, V. Lee, T. Yeung, R. Li, P. Ho et al., Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment, PLoS ONE, vol.10, issue.3, 2015.

N. P. Polyzos, M. Nwoye, R. Corona, C. Blockeel, D. Stoop et al., Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI, Reprod Biomed Online, vol.28, issue.4, pp.469-74, 2014.

N. P. Polyzos, C. Blockeel, W. Verpoest, M. D. Vos, D. Stoop et al., Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria, Hum Reprod, vol.27, issue.12, pp.3481-3487, 2012.

B. Xu, Y. Chen, D. Geerts, J. Yue, Z. Li et al., Cumulative live birth rates in more than 3,000 patients with poor ovarian response: a 15-year survey of final in vitro fertilization outcome, Fertil Steril, vol.109, issue.6, pp.1051-1060, 2018.

P. Roux, J. Perrin, J. Mancini, A. Agostini, L. Boubli et al., Factors associated with a poor prognosis for the IVF-ICSI live birth rate in women with rAFS stage III and IV endometriosis, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.34, issue.7, pp.921-929, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01681628

C. Alviggi, C. Y. Andersen, K. Buehler, A. Conforti, D. Placido et al., A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept, Fertil Steril, vol.105, issue.6, pp.1452-1455, 2016.