F. Gaffiot, Dictionnaire Latin-Français. Hachette, p.828

. Agence-de-la-biomédecine, , 2018.

, Bilan démographique 2015Insee Première1581

, Activité régionale d'AMP-Agence de la biomédecine, 2018.

L. Garceau, J. Henderson, L. J. Davis, S. Petrou, L. R. Henderson et al., Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.17, pp.3090-109, 2002.

Z. Philips, M. Barraza-llorens, and J. Posnett, Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.15, pp.95-106, 2000.

. Eshre-capri-workshop and . Group, Intrauterine insemination, Hum Reprod Update, vol.15, pp.265-77, 2009.

P. Merviel, M. H. Heraud, N. Grenier, E. Lourdel, P. Sanguinet et al., Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature, Fertil Steril, vol.93, pp.79-88, 2010.

J. Macleod and R. Z. Gold, The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage, J Urol, vol.66, pp.436-485, 1951.

R. Eliasson, Standards for investigation of human semen, Andrologia, vol.3, pp.49-64, 1971.

J. Auger, F. Eustache, and G. David, Standardisation de la classification morphologique des spermatozoïdes humains selon la méthode de David modifiée, Andrologie, vol.10, pp.358-73, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/bf03034491

URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF03034491.pdf

M. Gauci, M. Kruger, T. F. Coetzee, K. Smith, K. Van-der-merwe et al., Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme, Andrologia, vol.33, pp.135-176, 2001.

A. Badawy, A. Elnashar, and M. Eltotongy, Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.91, pp.777-81, 2009.

M. Erdem, A. Erdem, M. F. Mutlu, S. Ozisik, S. Yildiz et al., The impact of sperm morphology on the outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles with gonadotropins in unexplained and male subfertility, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.197, pp.120-124, 2016.

Y. Sun, B. Li, L. Q. Fan, W. B. Zhu, X. J. Chen et al., Does sperm morphology affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination in patients with normal sperm concentration and motility?, Andrologia, vol.44, pp.299-304, 2012.

B. Demir, B. Dilbaz, O. Cinar, B. Karadag, Y. Tasci et al., Factors affecting pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with favourable female characteristics, J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol, vol.31, pp.420-423, 2011.

C. Spiessens, D. Vanderschueren, C. Meuleman, D. 'hooghe, and T. , Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.80, pp.1185-1194, 2003.

O. Grigoriou, K. Pantos, E. Makrakis, D. Hassiakos, S. Konidaris et al., Impact of isolated teratozoospermia on the outcome of intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.83, pp.773-778, 2005.

M. J. Butcher, J. Janoo, M. Broce, D. J. Seybold, P. Gantt et al., Use of Sperm Parameters to Predict Clinical Pregnancy with Intrauterine Insemination, J Reprod Med, vol.61, pp.263-272, 2016.

R. Hauser, L. Yogev, A. Botchan, J. B. Lessing, G. Paz et al., Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria, Andrologia, vol.33, pp.13-20, 2001.

R. Lee, J. Hou, H. Ho, Y. Hwu, M. Lin et al., Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination, Int J Androl, vol.25, pp.277-80, 2002.

N. E. Deveneau, O. Sinno, M. Krause, D. Eastwood, J. I. Sandlow et al., Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.102, pp.1584-1590, 2014.

G. M. Lockwood, N. E. Deveneau, A. N. Shridharani, E. Y. Strawn, and J. I. Sandlow, Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination, Andrology, vol.3, pp.1088-93, 2015.

L. Lemmens, S. Kos, C. Beijer, J. W. Brinkman, F. Van-der-horst et al., Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.105, pp.1462-1470, 2016.

M. L. Check, A. Bollendorf, J. H. Check, and D. Katsoff, Reevaluation of the clinical importance of evaluating sperm morphology using strict criteria, Arch Androl, vol.48, pp.1-3, 2002.

W. Ombelet, R. Menkveld, T. F. Kruger, and O. Steeno, Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertility, Hum Reprod Update, vol.1, pp.543-57, 1995.

T. F. Kruger, R. Menkveld, F. S. Stander, C. J. Lombard, J. P. Van-der-merwe et al., Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization, Fertil Steril, vol.46, pp.1118-1141, 1986.

D. Y. Liu and H. W. Baker, Acrosome status and morphology of human spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida and oolemma determined using oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.9, pp.673-682, 1994.

R. A. Bronson, S. K. Bronson, and L. D. Oula, Ability of abnormally-shaped human spermatozoa to adhere to and penetrate zona-free hamster eggs: correlation with sperm morphology and postincubation motility, J Androl, vol.28, pp.698-705, 2007.

F. Ghaffari, S. J. Sadatmahalleh, M. R. Akhoond, E. Yazdi, P. Zolfaghari et al., Evaluating the effective factors in pregnancy after intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study, Int J Fertil Steril, vol.9, pp.300-308, 2015.

W. Liu, W. Li, R. Zhang, J. Gao, L. Wang et al., Factors influencing the clinical pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination, J Androl, vol.21, pp.992-998, 2015.

B. E. Speyer, B. Abramov, W. Saab, A. Doshi, U. Sarna et al., Factors influencing the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI): age, clinical variables and significant thresholds, J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.33, pp.697-700, 2013.

L. Dinelli, B. Courbière, V. Achard, E. Jouve, C. Deveze et al., Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles, Fertil Steril, vol.101, pp.994-1000, 2014.

A. Campana, D. Sakkas, A. Stalberg, P. G. Bianchi, I. Comte et al., Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.11, pp.732-738, 1996.

M. Ashrafi, M. Rashidi, A. Ghasemi, A. Arabipoor, S. Daghighi et al., The role of infertility etiology in success rate of intrauterine insemination cycles: an evaluation of predictive factors for pregnancy rate, Int J Fertil Steril, vol.7, pp.100-107, 2013.

T. Cochet, N. Gatimel, J. Moreau, C. Cohade, C. Fajau et al., Effect of unilateral tubal abnormalities on the results of intrauterine inseminations, Reprod Biomed Online, vol.35, pp.314-321, 2017.

M. R. Khalil, P. E. Rasmussen, K. Erb, S. B. Laursen, S. Rex et al., Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.80, pp.74-81, 2001.

P. Panel, J. P. Chansigaud, J. B. De-meeus, P. Kamina, and G. Magnin, Intra-uterine artificial insemination. Indications, techniques, results; 83 cases, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.24, pp.496-504, 1995.

R. Cabry-goubet, F. Scheffler, N. Belhadri-mansouri, S. Belloc, E. Lourdel et al., Effect of gonadotropin types and indications on homologous intrauterine insemination success: a study from 1251 cycles and a review of the litterature, BioMed Res Int, p.3512784, 2017.

R. P. Dickey, T. T. Olar, S. N. Taylor, D. N. Curole, and P. H. Rye, Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovulation induction: comparison to clomiphene citrate alone and human menopausal gonadotrophin alone, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.8, pp.56-65, 1993.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137874

P. D. Manganiello, J. E. Stern, T. A. Stukel, H. Crow, T. Brinck-johnsen et al., A comparison of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin for use in conjunction with intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.68, pp.405-417, 1997.

M. Erdem, S. Abay, A. Erdem, F. Mutlu, M. Nas et al., Recombinant FSH increases live birth rates as compared to clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with subfertility: a prospective randomized study, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.189, pp.33-40, 2015.

L. Haller, F. Severac, C. Rongieres, J. Ohl, K. Bettahar et al., Intra-uterine insemination at either 24 or 48hours after ovulation induction: Pregnancy and birth rates

, Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, vol.45, pp.210-214, 2017.

M. Hajder, E. Hajder, and A. Husic, The effects of total motile sperm count on spontaneous pregnancy rate and pregnancy after IUI treatment in couples with male factor and unexplained infertility, Med Arch Sarajevo Bosnia Herzeg, vol.70, pp.39-43, 2016.

R. Nikbakht and N. Saharkhiz, The influence of sperm morphology, total motile sperm count of semen and the number of motile sperm inseminated in sperm samples on the success of intrauterine insemination, Int J Fertil Steril, vol.5, pp.168-73, 2011.

R. W. Burr, R. Siegberg, S. P. Flaherty, X. J. Wang, and C. D. Matthews, The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation, Fertil Steril, vol.65, pp.127-159, 1996.

S. R. Lindheim, D. H. Barad, M. Zinger, B. Witt, H. Amin et al., Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.13, pp.569-72, 1996.

J. P. Toner, H. Mossad, D. R. Grow, M. Morshedi, R. J. Swanson et al., Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination, Andrologia, vol.27, pp.143-151, 1995.

J. Van-waart, T. F. Kruger, C. J. Lombard, and W. Ombelet, Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured litterature review, Hum Reprod Update, vol.7, pp.495-500, 2001.

D. S. Karabinus and T. J. Gelety, The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success, Fertil Steril, vol.67, pp.536-577, 1997.

B. R. Keegan, S. Barton, X. Sanchez, A. S. Berkeley, L. C. Krey et al., Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Fertil Steril, vol.88, pp.1583-1591, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.057

W. Ombelet, K. Deblaere, E. Bosmans, A. Cox, P. Jacobs et al., Semen quality and intrauterine insemination, Reprod Biomed Online, vol.7, pp.485-92, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61894-9

URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61894-9

R. Wainer, M. Albert, A. Dorion, M. Bailly, M. Bergère et al., Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.19, pp.2060-2065, 2004.

U. Dorjpurev, A. Kuwahara, Y. Yano, T. Taniguchi, Y. Yamamoto et al., Effect of semen characteristics on pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination, J Med Investig JMI, vol.58, pp.127-160, 2011.
DOI : 10.2152/jmi.58.127

URL : https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jmi/58/1%2C2/58_1%2C2_127/_pdf

U. Berg, C. Brucker, and F. D. Berg, Effect of motile sperm count after swim-up on outcome of intrauterine insemination, Fertil Steril, vol.67, pp.747-50, 1997.

K. Coetzee, T. F. Kruge, and C. J. Lombard, Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review, Hum Reprod Update, vol.4, pp.73-82, 1998.

W. Ombelet, F. L. Fourie, H. Vandeput, E. Bosmans, A. Cox et al., Teratozoospermia and in-vitro fertilization: a randomized prospective study, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.9, pp.1479-84, 1994.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138734

P. Terriou, C. Giorgetti, P. Auquier, E. Hans, J. L. Spach et al., Teratozoospermia influences fertilization rate in vitro but not embryo quality, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.12, pp.1069-72, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1069

URL : https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/12/5/1069/9815476/121069.pdf

K. Lundin, The impact of sperm morphology analysis on IVF results, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.36, issue.3, pp.69-73, 2007.

W. Fan, S. W. Li, L. Li, Z. Huang, Q. Ma et al., Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in the case of isolated teratozoospermia, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.29, pp.905-915, 2012.