A. Agarwal and R. K. Sharma, Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer, Fertil Steril, vol.87, issue.1, pp.156-62, 2007.

T. Akashi, I. Mizuno, A. Okumura, and H. Fuse, Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men, Arch Androl, vol.51, issue.6, pp.437-479, 2005.

C. Álvarez, J. A. Castilla, L. Martinez, J. P. Ramírez, F. Vergara et al., Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects, Hum Reprod, vol.18, issue.10, pp.2082-2090, 2003.

C. Álvarez, J. A. Castilla, J. P. Ramírez, F. Vergara, A. Yoldi et al., External quality control program for semen analysis : Spanish experience, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.22, issue.11, pp.379-87, 2005.

R. P. Amann and D. F. Katz, Reflections on CASA After 25 Years, J Androl, vol.25, issue.3, pp.317-342, 2004.

R. P. Amann and D. Waberski, Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): Capabilities and potential developments, Theriogenology, vol.81, issue.1, pp.1-3, 2014.

J. Auger, F. Eustache, B. Ducot, T. Blandin, M. Daudin et al., Intra-and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories, Hum Reprod, vol.15, issue.11, pp.2360-2368, 2000.

J. Auger, P. Jouannet, and F. Eustache, Another look of human sperm morphology, Hum Reprod, vol.31, issue.1, pp.10-23, 2016.

E. Bailey, N. Fenning, S. Chamberlain, L. Devlin, J. Hopkisson et al., Validation of Sperm Counting Methods Using Limits of Agreement, J Androl, vol.28, issue.3, pp.364-73, 2007.

C. L. Barratt, M. J. Tomlinson, and I. D. Cooke, Prognostic significance of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility, Fertil Steril, vol.60, issue.3, pp.520-525, 1993.

J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, vol.1, pp.307-317, 1986.

D. Bompart, A. García-molina, A. Valverde, C. Caldeira, J. Yániz et al., CASA-Mot technology: how results are affected by the frame rate and counting chamber, Reprod Fertil Dev, vol.30, issue.6, pp.810-819, 2018.

S. Boryshpolets, R. K. Kowalski, G. J. Dietrich, B. Dzyuba, and A. Ciereszko, Different computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) systems highly influence sperm motility parameters, Theriogenology, vol.80, issue.7, pp.758-65, 2013.

G. M. Centola, Comparison of Manual Microscopic and Computer-Assisted Methods for Analysis of Sperm Count and Motility, Arch Androl, vol.36, issue.1, pp.1-7, 1996.

, ESHRE (European Society of, Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques, vol.11, pp.1463-79, 1996.

T. G. Cooper and C. H. Yeung, Computer-aided evaluation of assessment of "grade a" spermatozoa by experienced technicians, Fertil Steril, vol.85, issue.1, pp.220-224, 2006.

M. U. Daloglu and A. Ozcan, Computational imaging of sperm locomotion, Biol Reprod, vol.97, issue.2, pp.182-190, 2017.

R. O. Davis and D. F. Katz, Standardization and Comparability of CASA Instruments, J Androl, vol.13, issue.1, pp.81-87, 1992.

C. G. Dearing, S. Kilburn, and K. S. Lindsay, Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory, Hum Fertil, vol.17, issue.1, pp.37-44, 2014.

E. T. Donnelly, S. E. Lewis, J. A. Mcnally, and W. Thompson, In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome, Fertil Steril, vol.70, issue.2, pp.305-319, 1998.

D. H. Douglas-hamilton, N. G. Smith, C. E. Kuster, J. Vermeiden, and G. C. Althouse, Capillary-Loaded Particle Fluid Dynamics: Effect on Estimation of Sperm Concentration, J Androl, vol.26, issue.1, pp.115-137, 2005.

D. H. Douglas-hamilton, N. G. Smith, C. E. Kuster, J. Vermeiden, and G. C. Althouse, Particle Distribution in Low-Volume Capillary-Loaded Chambers, J Androl, vol.26, issue.1, pp.107-121, 2005.

K. M. Engel, S. Grunewald, J. Schiller, and U. Paasch, Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision® versus the manual approach-A prospective double-blind study, Andrologia, vol.51, issue.1, p.13149, 2019.

E. Filimberti, S. Degl'innocenti, M. Borsotti, M. Quercioli, P. Piomboni et al., High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme, Andrology, vol.1, issue.3, pp.401-408, 2013.

C. Fuhrman and C. Chouaïd, Concordance de deux variables : les approches numériques, Rev Mal Respir, vol.21, issue.1, pp.123-128, 2004.

H. Fuse, T. Akashi, T. Nozaki, R. Nishio, and I. Mizuno, Assessment Of Sperm Quality Analyzer II B: Comparison With Manual Semen Analysis And CASA, Arch Androl, vol.51, issue.1, pp.65-72, 2005.

M. T. Gallagher, D. J. Smith, and J. C. Kirkman-brown, CASA: tracking the past and plotting the future, Reprod Fertil Dev, vol.30, issue.6, pp.867-74, 2018.

C. Garrett, D. Y. Liu, G. N. Clarke, D. D. Rushford, and H. Baker, Automated semen analysis: "zona pellucida preferred" sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples, Hum Reprod, vol.18, issue.8, pp.1643-1652, 2003.

G. Proctor, J. Boone, W. R. , and L. Higdon, Comparison of the Manual, IVOS, and SCA Methods for Semen Analysis Reporting, The Journal of Clinical Embryology, vol.12, issue.4, pp.5-7, 2009.

, Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa, ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod, vol.13, issue.1, pp.142-147, 1998.

Y. Hirano, H. Shibahara, H. Obara, T. Suzuki, S. Takamizawa et al., Relationships Between Sperm Motility Characteristics Assessed by the Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) and Fertilization Rates In Vitro, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.18, issue.4, pp.213-221, 2001.

Y. A. Hu, J. C. Lu, Y. Shao, and Y. F. Huang, Comparison of four methods for sperm counting, National Journal of Andrology), vol.12, issue.3, p.227, 2006.

D. S. Irvine, I. C. Macleod, A. A. Templeton, A. Masterton, and A. Taylor, Andrology: A prospective clinical study of the relationship between the computer-assisted assessment of human semen quality and the achievement of pregnancy in vivo, Hum Reprod, vol.9, issue.12, pp.2324-2358, 1994.

J. E. Johnson, D. W. Blackhurst, and W. R. Boone, Can Westgard quality control rules determine the suitability of frozen sperm pellets as a control material for computer automated semen analyzers?, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.20, issue.1, pp.38-44, 2003.

P. Jouannet and C. Serres, Mouvement normal et pathologique du spermatozoïde humain

, Médecin/sciences, vol.4, issue.11, pp.555-62, 1995.

M. K. Kanakasabapathy, M. Sadasivam, A. Singh, C. Preston, P. Thirumalaraju et al., An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-ofcare semen analysis, Sci Transl Med, vol.9, issue.382, p.7863, 2017.

B. A. Keel, P. Quinn, C. F. Schmidt, N. T. Serafy, N. T. Serafy et al., Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology, Hum Reprod, vol.15, issue.3, pp.680-686, 2000.

M. Kraemer, C. Fillion, B. Martin-pont, and J. Auger, Factors influencing human sperm kinematic measurements by the Celltrak computer-assisted sperm analysis system, Hum Reprod, vol.13, issue.3, pp.611-620, 1998.

W. Krause, Computer-assisted semen analysis systems: comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction, Hum Reprod, vol.10, issue.1, pp.60-66, 1995.

J. Lammers, C. Splingart, P. Barrière, M. Jean, and T. Fréour, Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.31, issue.1, pp.35-43, 2014.

L. Larsen, T. Scheike, T. K. Jensen, J. P. Bonde, E. Ernst et al., Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population, Hum Reprod, vol.15, issue.7, pp.1562-1569, 2000.

L. Lannou, D. Griveau, J. F. , L. Pichon, J. P. Quero et al., Effects of chamber depth on the motion pattern of human spermatozoa in semen or in capacitating medium, Hum Reprod, vol.7, issue.10, pp.1417-1438, 1992.

L. Li, Y. Ning, H. Yin, and Z. Sun, The application of computer assisted sperm analysis on in vitro fertilization, vol.34, pp.112-116, 2003.

D. Y. Liu, G. N. Clarke, and W. G. Baker, Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates In Vitro, J Androl, vol.12, issue.4, pp.231-240, 1991.

J. C. Lu, Y. F. Huang, and N. Q. Lü, Computer-aided sperm analysis: past, present and future, Andrologia, vol.46, issue.4, pp.329-367, 2014.

C. Mallidis, T. G. Cooper, B. Hellenkemper, M. Lablans, F. Ückert et al., Ten years' experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis, Fertil Steril, vol.98, issue.3, pp.611-617, 2012.

C. Manuel-fournisseur-hamilton-thorne-du-casa-hamilton-thorne and . Ii,

D. Mortimer, R. Aitken, S. Mortimer, and A. Pacey, Workshop report: clinical CASA--the quest for consensus, Reprod Fertil Dev, vol.7, issue.4, pp.951-960, 1995.

D. Mortimer and S. T. Mortimer, Influence of system parameter settings on human sperm motility analysis using CellSoft, Hum Reprod, vol.3, issue.5, pp.621-626, 1988.

D. Mortimer, C. Serres, S. T. Mortimer, and P. Jouannet, Influence of image sampling frequency on the perceived movement characteristics of progressively motile human spermatozoa, Gamete Res, vol.20, issue.3, pp.313-340, 1988.

S. T. Mortimer, G. Van-der-horst, and D. Mortimer, The future of computer-aided sperm analysis, Asian J Androl, vol.17, issue.4, pp.545-53, 2015.

S. T. Mortimer, CASA -Practical Aspects, J Androl, vol.21, issue.4, pp.515-539, 2000.

J. Neuwinger, U. A. Knuth, and E. Nieschlag, Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn 2030 motility analyser for routine semen analysis in an infertility clinic, Int J Androl, vol.13, issue.2, pp.100-109, 1990.

S. S. Ren, G. H. Sun, C. H. Ku, and D. C. Chen, Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI, Arch Androl, vol.50, issue.3, pp.139-182, 2004.

E. K. Seaman, E. Goluboff, N. Barchama, and H. Fisch, Accuracy of semen counting chambers as determined by the use of latex beads*. Fertil Steril, vol.66, pp.662-667, 1996.

H. Shibahara, H. Obara, . Ayustawati, Y. Hirano, T. Suzuki et al., Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility, Int J Androl, vol.27, issue.2, pp.63-71, 2004.

J. Spiropoulos, Computerized semen analysis (CASA): effect of semen concentration and chamber depth on measurements, Arch Androl, vol.46, issue.1, pp.37-42, 2001.

T. Suzuki, H. Shibahara, H. Tsunoda, Y. Hirano, A. Taneichi et al., Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates, Int J Androl, vol.25, issue.1, pp.49-54, 2002.

J. Talarczyk-desole, A. Berger, G. Taszarek-hauke, J. Hauke, L. Pawelczyk et al., Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?, Ginekol Pol, vol.88, issue.2, pp.56-60, 2017.

P. Thonneau, S. Marchand, A. Tallec, M. L. Ferial, B. Ducot et al., Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions, Hum Reprod, vol.6, issue.6, pp.811-817, 1988.

M. J. Tomlinson, K. Pooley, T. Simpson, T. Newton, J. Hopkisson et al., Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms, Fertil Steril, vol.93, issue.6, pp.1911-1931, 2010.

D. D. Vernon, J. E. Johnson, A. M. Houwing, I. Higdon, . Hl et al., Accu-Beads as a quality control measure for manual and automated methods of measuring sperm concentration-an observational study, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.31, issue.1, pp.25-33, 2014.

A. Vested, C. H. Ramlau-hansen, J. P. Bonde, A. M. Thulstrup, S. L. Kristensen et al., A comparison of conventional and computer-assisted semen analysis (CRISMAS software) using samples from 166 young Danish men, Asian J Androl, vol.13, issue.3, pp.453-461, 2011.

, World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, p.271, 2010.

M. J. Zinaman, M. L. Uhler, E. Vertuno, S. G. Fisher, and E. D. Clegg, Evaluation of CASA with IDENT Stain to determine sperm concentration, J Androl, vol.17, issue.3, pp.288-92, 1996.

E. Zuvela, S. Junk, N. Moska, and P. Matson, The use of latex beads in external quality assurance and internal quality control for routine semen analysis, Reprod Biol, vol.11, issue.3, pp.264-75, 2011.

, Tableau 31 -Comparaison de méthodes : résultats de concentration et mobilité N° MANUELLE CASA