Avec les informations actuelles, Ng et coll. avancent qu'il peut être prudent de limiter l'utilisation du système Encode ® aux restaurations supra-implantaires unitaires afin de limiter les erreurs ,
utilisation des vis de cicatrisation Encode ® couplée à l'utilisation de l'empreinte optique, éliminant le processus Robocast ® , serait une bonne alternative afin d'utiliser le protocole Encode ® en supprimant toutes les sources potentielles d'erreur vues précédemment. Mais à ce jour, la précision des résultats de l'empreinte optique associée au système Encode ® , avec une CFAO dite semi-directe ,
The Effect of Coded Healing Abutments on Treatment Duration and Clinical Outcome: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Encode and Conventional Impression Protocols, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. sept, vol.32, issue.5, pp.1172-1179 ,
The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs, J Clin Periodontol. août, vol.24, issue.8, pp.568-72, 1997. ,
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations, J Prosthet Dent. août, vol.110, issue.2, p.100, 2013. ,
Intraoral scanners and digital implant impressionning, Dent. Aout, vol.9, issue.8, p.96, 2013. ,
, Align Technology Inc. iTero Element, brochure for general practitionners, 2015.
Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations, Implant Dent. déc, vol.13, issue.4, p.66, 2004. ,
La CFAO appliquée à l'odontologie restauratrice et à la prothèse, Réal Clin, vol.20, issue.4, pp.215-222, 2009. ,
Correction of Malpositioned Implants through Periodontal Surgery and Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using Angled Abutment. Case Rep Dent, 2014. ,
Marginal accuracy of three implantceramic abutment configurations, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. juin, vol.27, issue.3, p.43, 2012. ,
Interactions numériques : une nouvelle façon de communiquer entre praticiens et prothésistes, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.4, p.303, 2015. ,
The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth, Clin Oral Implants Res. juin, vol.2, issue.2, p.90, 1991. ,
Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations, Br Dent J. 10 mai, vol.204, issue.9, pp.505-516, 2008. ,
Un cli c'est sûr et Certain®. La nouvelle génération d'implant à connexion Interne, 2006. ,
Système de restauration BellaTekEncode®. Manuel clinique. 2013b. Biomet3i. BellaTek® Encode® impression system ,
Digital impressions of coded implant abutments, Dent, vol.7, issue.8, p.110 ,
Du prototypage rapide à la fabrication rapide, Technol Dent, vol.34, issue.124, p.5, 2003. ,
, Médecine parodontale, vol.1, 2014.
Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. août, vol.150, issue.2, pp.261-268, 2016. ,
Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature, J Indian Prosthodont Soc. mars, vol.14, issue.1, pp.16-23, 2014. ,
Next generation digital implant restorations, J Implant Reconstr Dent, vol.6, issue.2, p.13, 2015. ,
A simplified impression protocol for fabrication of anatomical, cement-retained CAD/CAM abutments, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, vol.34, issue.3, pp.19-25, 2014. ,
Best in Class : Inclusive custom Abutments. Inclusive Dental Implant Magazine, Disponible sur, vol.3, 2012. ,
La résorption osseuse péri-implantaire après ostéointégration ,
, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.3, pp.206-224, 2015.
, J Parodontol Implantol Orale, vol.17, issue.4, p.30, 1998.
Manuel d'implantologie clinique: concepts, intégration des protocoles et esquisses de nouveaux paradigmes, DL, 2012. ,
Increasing implant dentistry in undergraduate education using new technology: a pilot project, Journal of implant and reconstructive dentistry, vol.40, p.5, 2010. ,
Espace biologique péri-implantaire. Preuves histologiques : revue d'étude animales, J Parodontol Implantol Orale, vol.29, issue.4, pp.245-59, 2010. ,
Comparison of CEREC Bluecam and CEREC Omnicam, 2013. ,
,
The digitalizing of implant dentistry: a clinical evaluation of 15 patients, Compend Contin Educ Dent Jamesburg NJ 1995. mars, vol.34, issue.3, pp.192-198, 2013. ,
, Les bases, les principes et les systèmes. CdP. 2016. (Malakoff)
Guidelines for implant abutment selection for partially edentulous patients, Compend Contin Educ Dent Jamesburg NJ, vol.31, issue.1, pp.26-27, 1995. ,
Implant laboratory procedures: a step-by-step guide, 2010. ,
Implant restorations: a step-by-step guide, 2014. ,
Treatment of an Edentulous Patient with CAD/CAM Technology: A Clinical Report, J Prosthodont. 1 mai, vol.16, issue.3, 2007. ,
Gestion du profil d'émergence en implantologie, Rev Odontostomatol (Paris). Mai, vol.117, issue.40, p.29, 2011. ,
, année CFAO. Réal Clin, vol.20, issue.4, pp.213-217, 2009.
The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. mai, vol.14, issue.1, pp.30-38, 2012. ,
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial, Eur J Oral Implantol, vol.10, issue.1, pp.57-72, 2017. ,
Forme transgingivale du pilier prothétique : incidences sur le comportement gingival autour des restaurations prothétiques antérieures implanto-portées, Implant, issue.23, pp.31-39 ,
Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial, Eur J Oral Implantol, vol.5, issue.1, pp.9-16, 2012. ,
A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration, J Prosthet Dent. mars, vol.95, issue.3, p.61, 2006. ,
La connexion implant-prothèse, AOS. sept, vol.9, p.13, 2013. ,
, Inf Dent, vol.20, pp.22-31, 2014.
Accuracy of the Biomet 3i Encode® RobocastTM Technology Versus Conventional Implant Impression Techniques ,
Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. févr, vol.28, issue.1, p.40, 2013. ,
Régénération des papilles gingivales après la pose d'un implant unitaire, Rev Int Parod Dent Restaur, vol.17, pp.327-360, 1997. ,
Digital implant impressions with the « Individualized Scanbody Technique » for emergence profile support, Clin Oral Implants Res. mars, vol.25, issue.3, pp.395-402, 2014. ,
Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement, Clin Oral Implants Res. juill, vol.25, issue.7, pp.797-802, 2014. ,
The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. juin, vol.28, issue.3, pp.807-821, 2013. ,
Prothèse implantaire fixe scellée et vissée à l'heure du numérique, Spécial Implantologie, vol.1, issue.12, p.6, 2011. ,
L'empreinte optique intra-buccale et ses applications au cabinet dentaire. Sarrebruck, Allemagne: Éditions universitaires européennes, 2011. ,
Conventional Implant Impressions: Efficiency Outcomes, Clin Oral Implants Res, vol.24, issue.1, p.5, 2012. ,
Technique d'empreinte supra-implantaire: le transfert d'empreinte est-il toujours d'actualité dans le traitement de l'édentement unitaire ? Le concept BellaTek® Encode® (Biomet3i®), Strat Prothétique. mars, vol.16, issue.2, pp.89-96, 2016. ,
Le binôme praticien-prothésiste, un couple fragile? Strat Dent, vol.17, p.31, 2017. ,
The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone, J Prosthet Dent. mars, vol.109, issue.3, p.91, 2013. ,
The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study, Clin Oral Implants Res. janv, vol.24, issue.1, pp.71-77, 2013. ,
The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations, Clin Oral Implants Res. déc, vol.22, issue.12, pp.1379-84, 2011. ,
Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study, Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016. ,
Réhabilitation prothétique sur implant: une nouvelle approche : le système Encode, 2010. ,
CAD/CAM implant abutments using coded healing abutments: a detailed description of the restorative process, Compend Contin Educ Dent Jamesburg NJ, vol.34, issue.8, pp.612-617, 1995. ,
Gestion implantaire de l'édentement unitaire dans le secteur esthétique: une approche visant à optimiser les tissus. Partie II: aspects prothétiques, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.1, pp.15-24, 2015. ,
Les implants: chirurgie et prothèse : choix thérapeutique stratégique, 2008. ,
Prothèse implantaire pour l'omnipraticien. Paris etc., France: Quintessence international, 2003. ,
The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial, Clin Oral Implants Res. avr, vol.28, issue.4, pp.443-52, 2017. ,
CFAO ce qui change pour le praticien, Réal Clin, vol.20, issue.4, p.216, 2009. ,
Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations, J Prosthet Dent. avr, vol.109, issue.4, pp.210-215, 2013. ,
Three-dimensional accuracy of a digitally coded healing abutment implant impression system, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. août, vol.29, issue.4, pp.927-963, 2014. ,
A laboratory procedure to facilitate development of an emergence profile with a custom implant abutment, J Prosthet Dent. févr, vol.79, issue.2, p.4, 1998. ,
Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments, J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. sept, vol.63, issue.9, p.32, 2005. ,
Optimal results in the esthetic zone with CAD/CAM implant abutments : a patient example, Dent. avr, vol.2, issue.3, 2006. ,
Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations, J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent Al, vol.24, issue.5, pp.299-308, 2012. ,
La temporisation et les empreintes en implantologie, Quintessence international, 2013. ,
Evidence-based Implant Treatment Planning and Clinical Protocols, 2017. ,
Impact of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color. An in vitro study, Clin Oral Investig, 2016. ,
3MTM True Definition Scanner, l'expertise de soin oral version numérique ,
Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. mai, vol.12, issue.1, pp.63-76, 2010. ,
, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.4, pp.326-333, 2015.
La chaine numérique en CFAO dentaire en prothèse conjointe.Structuration de la chaîne de production, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.4, p.73, 2015. ,
The use of a coded healing abutment as an impression coping to design and mill an individualized anatomic abutment: a clinical report, J Prosthet Dent. mai, vol.105, issue.5, p.5, 2011. ,
Rôle du pilier implantaire sur l'esthétique des tissus mous péri-implantaires, J Parodontol Implantol Orale, vol.31, issue.2, p.9, 2012. ,
Système de prise d'empreinte BellaTek®Encode®. Optimization By Design, 2013. ,
Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature, Int J Prosthodont, vol.12, issue.167, 1999. ,
The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study, J Periodontol. sept, vol.80, issue.9, pp.1388-92, 2009. ,
, , 2005.
Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions, Int J Prosthodont. août, vol.21, issue.4, pp.299-301, 2008. ,
Intraoral scanning systems -a current overview, Int J Comput Dent, vol.18, issue.2, p.29, 2015. ,